Incorporation and Organization | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

1. The Corporation Code and Related Laws

• Philippine corporations are primarily governed by Republic Act No. 11232 or the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (RCC), which took effect in February 2019. The RCC supersedes the old Batas Pambansa Bilang 68.
• The RCC introduced modernizations such as the One Person Corporation (OPC), relaxed incorporation requirements, enhanced shareholder protections, and provisions for perpetual existence.
• The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the main regulatory body overseeing corporate formation and compliance.

2. Types of Corporations

• Stock Corporation: A corporation with capital stock divided into shares, which are owned by the stockholders.
• Non-Stock Corporation: Does not issue shares and is generally organized for charitable, educational, religious, or similar purposes.
• One Person Corporation (OPC): A unique single-shareholder corporation, available for natural persons, trusts, and estates but not for banks, insurance, or publicly listed companies.
• Close Corporations: Corporations with limitations on stockholder membership and share transfers; family-owned and small businesses often choose this model.

3. Requirements for Incorporation

• Articles of Incorporation (AOI): The founding document of the corporation must include:

  1. Corporate Name: Must be unique, approved by the SEC, and not similar to any existing entity.
  2. Primary and Secondary Purposes: Defines the scope of corporate activities. Purpose clauses limit corporate activities.
  3. Principal Office: Must be located within the Philippines.
  4. Term of Existence: The RCC allows corporations to exist perpetually unless otherwise stated.
  5. Incorporators: Individuals who initially form the corporation. Under the RCC, only two to fifteen incorporators are required, with the exception of an OPC.
  6. Directors and Trustees: Initial directors (for stock corporations) or trustees (for non-stock) must be named, with at least a majority being residents of the Philippines.

• Bylaws: These are rules governing internal management and are usually adopted within one month of incorporation. Bylaws must include:

  1. Time and manner of calling and conducting regular or special meetings.
  2. Number and qualifications of directors or trustees, officers, and the manner of electing or appointing them.
  3. Rules regarding dividends (for stock corporations) and any other needed regulations.

• Minimum Capital Stock Requirement: Most corporations are no longer required to meet a minimum paid-up capital except for specific industries. However, foreign-owned corporations must comply with minimum capital requirements under the Foreign Investments Act and sector-specific laws.

4. Steps in Incorporation

1. Verification of Corporate Name: SEC checks for name availability and uniqueness.
2. Preparation of Incorporation Documents: Drafting and notarization of the AOI and bylaws.
3. Filing with the SEC: The AOI, bylaws, treasurer’s affidavit, and other required forms are submitted to the SEC.
4. Issuance of Certificate of Incorporation: Once the SEC verifies compliance, it issues a Certificate of Incorporation, granting the corporation legal personality.

5. Distinctive Features of Incorporation Under RCC

• Perpetual Corporate Existence: Unless limited by the AOI, a corporation now enjoys perpetual existence.
• One Person Corporation (OPC): Allows single individuals to form a corporation without the usual multi-person board structure.
• Easier Amendment Processes: Corporations can now amend their AOI with simplified SEC approval requirements.

6. Corporate Structure and Governance

• Board of Directors/Trustees: Stock corporations are governed by a Board of Directors; non-stock by Trustees. The board must be composed of 2 to 15 members, with a majority being residents.
• Officers: Mandatory corporate officers include the President, Corporate Secretary, and Treasurer, with other optional officers depending on the corporation’s needs.
• Shareholders’ Rights: Stockholders in corporations have rights to vote, dividends, inspect books, and in some cases, file derivative suits for corporate wrongdoing.
• Meetings: Regular meetings must be held annually, and special meetings may be convened by the board or upon request by a sufficient percentage of shareholders. Electronic participation is permissible under the RCC.

7. Capitalization and Shares

• Authorized, Subscribed, and Paid-Up Capital: These terms relate to the capital stock, with paid-up capital being the amount shareholders have paid upon subscription.
• Classes of Shares: Corporations may issue common or preferred shares with different rights and privileges.
• Par Value: Corporations may issue shares with a par or no-par value.
• Dividends: Stock corporations can declare cash, property, or stock dividends, subject to board approval and company profits.

8. Corporate Reporting and Compliance

• General Information Sheet (GIS): Must be submitted yearly to the SEC, listing the company’s directors, officers, stockholders, and principal address.
• Audited Financial Statements: Required annually, with specific deadlines depending on the corporation’s industry and fiscal year.
• Foreign-Owned Corporations: Subject to additional requirements, including foreign ownership restrictions, tax regulations, and compliance with sector-specific laws.
• Non-Compliance Consequences: Failure to comply with SEC reporting can lead to penalties, revocation of corporate registration, and in severe cases, criminal liability for corporate officers.

9. Tax Obligations and Regulatory Requirements

• Corporate Income Tax: Corporations are subject to a 30% income tax, with varying rates for micro, small, and medium enterprises under the CREATE Act.
• Withholding Taxes and VAT: Corporations must withhold taxes on certain payments and comply with VAT regulations if applicable.
• Local Government Taxes: Corporate operations are subject to local business taxes (LBT) imposed by local government units.
• Special Taxes for Certain Industries: Financial institutions, telecommunications, and specific sectors may have additional taxes or fees regulated by industry-specific laws.

10. Corporate Dissolution and Liquidation

• Voluntary Dissolution: Corporations may dissolve voluntarily by board resolution with shareholder approval, subject to SEC filing.
• Involuntary Dissolution: Grounds include non-compliance with legal requirements or court order due to illegal activities.
• Liquidation Process: Involves settling debts, distributing remaining assets among shareholders, and deregistration with the SEC.

This comprehensive framework of corporate incorporation, organization, governance, compliance, and taxation underscores the rigorous legal structure the Philippines provides to ensure organized corporate growth and protection for stakeholders.

One Person Corporation | Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

One Person Corporation (OPC) under Philippine Law

The concept of the One Person Corporation (OPC) in the Philippines is governed by Republic Act No. 11232, also known as the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines. Enacted in 2019, this law introduced the OPC as a new form of corporation to address the needs of small to medium enterprises and individual entrepreneurs who wish to operate as a corporation without the need for partners or a board of directors. Below is a comprehensive examination of the key aspects, requirements, rights, limitations, and obligations related to OPCs in the Philippines.

---

Definition of a One Person Corporation

A One Person Corporation (OPC) is defined under the Revised Corporation Code as a corporation with a single stockholder who may be either a natural person, trust, or an estate. This single stockholder serves as both the incorporator and the sole director of the corporation, eliminating the need for multiple incorporators and board members as required in traditional corporations.

---

Key Features of the One Person Corporation

1. Single Incorporator:

   • Only one person is needed to establish an OPC. This incorporator must be either:
     • A natural person (i.e., a Filipino or a foreign individual),
     • A trust (subject to specific regulations), or
     • An estate (e.g., an inheritance being managed under a legal estate).
   • The incorporator is responsible for 100% of the corporation's shares and owns complete control over its decision-making processes.

2. No Minimum Capital Requirement:

   • Unlike traditional corporations that may have minimum capital requirements, an OPC has no minimum capital stock requirement unless required by specific industry regulations.
   • However, any subscribed capital must be paid in full at the time of incorporation.

3. Limited Liability:

   • As with traditional corporations, an OPC affords its single shareholder the benefit of limited liability. This means that the personal assets of the incorporator are generally protected from corporate liabilities, unless the incorporator engages in unlawful acts such as fraud, bad faith, or gross negligence that would justify piercing the corporate veil.

4. Corporate Succession:

   • The sole stockholder of an OPC is required to nominate a successor who will take over management in case of the stockholder’s death or incapacity.
   • This ensures the continuity of the OPC, which is particularly beneficial for business continuity planning.

---

Limitations on One Person Corporations

1. Prohibited for Certain Types of Businesses:

   • Banks, quasi-banks, pre-need companies, trust companies, insurance companies, public and publicly listed companies, and non-chartered government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) are prohibited from being registered as OPCs.
   • This limitation aims to ensure that entities engaged in financial intermediation or requiring heightened public accountability cannot operate under the OPC structure.

2. Residency Requirement:

   • If the single stockholder is a foreign national, the OPC must comply with the Foreign Investment Act and other applicable laws regulating foreign ownership. Certain industries also impose restrictions on foreign equity ownership.

---

Mandatory Requirements for the Establishment of an OPC

1. Articles of Incorporation:

   • The Articles of Incorporation must explicitly state that the corporation is an OPC, including the suffix "OPC" in the corporate name to distinguish it from other types of corporations.
   • Additional information required includes:
     • The full name of the incorporator.
     • Nomination of a Designated Nominee and an Alternate Nominee in case of the sole stockholder’s death or incapacity.
     • The initial capital stock, if any, which must be fully paid upon incorporation.

2. Bylaws:

   • Unlike traditional corporations, an OPC is not required to adopt bylaws. This simplifies the administrative process and reduces regulatory burdens.

3. Annual Reports and Financial Statements:

   • OPCs are required to submit an Annual Financial Statement and General Information Sheet (GIS) to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
   • A distinction in financial reporting applies:
     • If the total assets or total liabilities exceed PHP 600,000, the financial statements must be audited by an independent certified public accountant.
     • If the threshold is not met, financial statements may be self-prepared.

---

Management and Operations of an OPC

1. Sole Director and Officer:

   • The single stockholder serves as both the President and sole director. However, he/she may also assume other corporate roles, such as the Treasurer and Corporate Secretary, subject to certain guidelines.
   • For compliance purposes:
     • If the single stockholder acts as the Treasurer, a surety bond must be posted in favor of the SEC to protect the OPC against potential malfeasance.

2. Decision-Making and Documentation:

   • All corporate actions, resolutions, and contracts may be executed solely by the single stockholder.
   • Resolutions and other records of major decisions must be documented for proper corporate governance and legal compliance.

3. Nominee and Succession Plan:

   • The Designated Nominee assumes temporary control and management if the sole stockholder dies or becomes incapacitated, ensuring the OPC’s continuity.
   • Within 15 days after the original stockholder’s incapacity or death, the Nominee must notify the SEC of the succession, with the stockholder's estate determining a more permanent succession plan if necessary.

---

Legal Protections and Liabilities

1. Protection Against Misuse of Corporate Structure:

   • The Revised Corporation Code allows for piercing the corporate veil when the OPC is used to perpetrate fraud, evade obligations, or when personal interests are inseparable from corporate actions.
   • Mismanagement or abuse by the incorporator may thus lead to personal liability.

2. Taxation:

   • OPCs are taxed similarly to other domestic corporations, subject to corporate income tax and other applicable taxes.
   • The OPC structure may result in tax advantages compared to sole proprietorships, as it can qualify for deductions and tax benefits exclusive to corporate entities.

---

Dissolution and Liquidation of an OPC

1. Voluntary Dissolution:

   • An OPC may dissolve voluntarily upon the decision of the sole stockholder. The stockholder must file a Notice of Voluntary Dissolution with the SEC.

2. Liquidation Process:

   • Upon dissolution, all assets of the OPC must be liquidated and applied toward settling liabilities, with any remaining assets transferred to the stockholder.
   • If the sole stockholder passes away without a succession plan, the estate will handle the distribution and liquidation of assets under probate proceedings.

---

Conclusion

The introduction of the One Person Corporation has been a pivotal advancement in Philippine corporate law, streamlining the process for individuals to establish a corporation. It provides greater flexibility, control, and limited liability to sole proprietors or entrepreneurs who wish to formalize their business structure without the complexities of forming a traditional corporation. Through minimal requirements, continuity planning, and the convenience of single-stockholder governance, OPCs cater to the evolving needs of modern entrepreneurs in the Philippines.

Religious Corporation | Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

In Philippine law, religious corporations are distinct entities specifically established for religious purposes, falling under the broader classification of "corporations sole" or "religious societies." These entities operate under the auspices of the Corporation Code of the Philippines (Batas Pambansa Blg. 68) and are designed to address the unique organizational and functional needs of religious groups. Below is an exhaustive exploration of religious corporations under Philippine law.

1. Definition and Nature of Religious Corporations

A religious corporation is primarily established for the administration and governance of church or religious affairs. Unlike commercial or stock corporations focused on profit generation, religious corporations serve to manage the property, assets, and legal matters for religious purposes without aiming for profit.

Religious corporations can take two primary forms under Philippine law:

1. Corporation Sole: This is an entity composed of a single person, typically an ecclesiastical officer like a bishop, priest, or minister, who serves as the trustee of the temporalities of the church. Corporation sole structures are used mainly by hierarchical churches to handle the administration and legal matters of the church property and assets.

2. Religious Societies: These are organizations established by groups of individuals who come together to form an association or society with religious purposes. These corporations are managed by a board of trustees, similar to other non-stock corporations but are tailored for religious worship, advancement of faith, and the community’s spiritual growth.

2. Legal Basis and Governing Law

Religious corporations are governed by Sections 109 to 116 of the Corporation Code of the Philippines. These provisions outline the creation, governance, powers, dissolution, and succession of religious corporations, particularly focusing on corporations sole. Key sections include:

• Section 109: Recognizes and defines a "corporation sole" as a special form of corporation organized to manage the property of religious denominations.
• Section 110: Establishes the procedural requirements for forming a corporation sole, including the filing of Articles of Incorporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
• Section 113: Details the authority of a corporation sole to acquire and hold property, essential for managing church-owned assets.
• Section 115: Specifies the process for succession within a corporation sole, ensuring continuity when a current officeholder (e.g., bishop or priest) vacates their position.

3. Formation of Religious Corporations

Corporation Sole

To establish a corporation sole, an individual occupying a clerical office (bishop, minister, etc.) must file Articles of Incorporation with the SEC. These articles must include the following information:

• The name of the corporation sole and the ecclesiastical office it represents.
• The principal office location.
• The full name of the individual constituting the corporation sole.
• A declaration that the entity will be used solely for managing church property and facilitating its religious mission.

The filing must be accompanied by certified proof of the ecclesiastical office and a notarized affidavit of consent. Once approved, the corporation sole gains legal capacity to act in secular matters regarding property and contractual relationships.

Religious Societies

Religious societies, or religious non-stock corporations, are formed when a group of individuals (at least five) establishes a non-profit religious organization. This formation follows the general rules for non-stock corporations under the Corporation Code but must adhere to religious, not-for-profit goals in its activities and management.

4. Powers and Limitations

Powers

Religious corporations are endowed with specific powers to ensure they can fulfill their religious and administrative functions. These powers include:

• Holding and Managing Property: They can acquire, hold, and dispose of property for religious purposes, as long as it is consistent with the religious mission.
• Contractual Authority: They can enter into contracts, sue, and be sued in court.
• Governance Autonomy: The religious leadership (e.g., bishops or trustees) can make decisions concerning the corporation’s operations, in line with the religious doctrine and mission.

Limitations

Religious corporations are limited in the following respects:

• Non-Profit Nature: They cannot engage in profit-making activities. Any income or assets must directly serve the religious mission.
• Ownership Restrictions: The property is held in trust for the religious mission and not for individual gain.
• Succession Rules: A corporation sole is limited by its requirement for a specific succession process, ensuring that the officeholder’s replacement (e.g., the new bishop) inherits both responsibilities and property.

5. Succession in Corporation Sole

In cases where the position in a corporation sole becomes vacant (e.g., due to death, resignation, or removal of the religious leader), the succession process under Section 115 of the Corporation Code ensures continuity. The successor, upon meeting the qualifications and taking office, assumes the corporation sole’s responsibilities without requiring a new SEC filing, preserving the corporation's legal identity and authority.

6. Dissolution of Religious Corporations

Religious corporations, like other non-stock entities, can be dissolved voluntarily or involuntarily. Voluntary dissolution may occur through the filing of a verified request for dissolution with the SEC, often approved by the relevant religious authority. Involuntary dissolution might arise if the corporation fails to meet legal compliance or faces judicial dissolution for serious misconduct.

7. Taxation of Religious Corporations

Tax-Exempt Status

Religious corporations generally qualify for tax exemptions on income and property under Section 28(3), Article VI of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC). Key points regarding taxation include:

1. Income Tax Exemption: Income generated by religious corporations that are directly tied to religious activities (e.g., donations, offerings) is exempt from income tax. However, income derived from unrelated business activities may be subject to taxation.

2. Property Tax Exemption: Properties used exclusively for religious worship or charitable activities are exempt from property taxes. However, properties not used for religious purposes, such as commercial lease arrangements, may be subject to property tax.

3. Other Exemptions: Religious corporations are exempt from documentary stamp taxes on donations and other activities directly related to religious purposes.

Reporting Requirements

Religious corporations must still comply with some reporting requirements to maintain their tax-exempt status. This includes filing certain forms with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) if they have unrelated income or property not used exclusively for religious purposes.

8. Jurisprudence on Religious Corporations

Philippine case law highlights key principles in managing and interpreting the rights of religious corporations:

• Separate Legal Identity: Religious corporations are separate legal entities, meaning the property of a corporation sole does not belong to the officeholder individually but to the corporation for the benefit of the religious organization.
• Autonomy in Religious Affairs: Courts generally uphold the autonomy of religious corporations in matters of doctrine and religious practice, respecting the constitutional separation of church and state.
• Property Disputes: The Supreme Court has often ruled in favor of the religious corporation’s right to manage its properties as long as they align with the religious mission, recognizing the unique role of these entities in supporting faith-based activities.

Conclusion

Religious corporations in the Philippines provide an essential legal structure for religious organizations to manage their properties and carry out their missions. By recognizing both the corporation sole and religious society models, the Corporation Code accommodates the diversity in religious organizational needs. These corporations enjoy unique privileges, such as tax exemptions and specific succession rules, that support their non-profit, faith-centered objectives. Nonetheless, they must adhere to Philippine corporate and tax laws, especially regarding property use, unrelated income, and compliance requirements, to maintain their special status under Philippine law.

Educational Corporations | Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Educational Corporations under Philippine Law

In the Philippines, educational corporations are a distinct category within the broader classification of private corporations. These are organizations established and regulated under the Revised Corporation Code (RCC) and the Education Act of 1982 (Batas Pambansa Blg. 232), among other related laws. This type of corporation is characterized by its purpose to operate educational institutions and is subject to specific rules regarding formation, governance, and taxation due to its unique social role.

1. Definition and Purpose of Educational Corporations

Educational corporations are private, non-profit, or for-profit corporations created to operate schools, colleges, universities, or similar educational institutions. They must align with the public policy of promoting and enhancing quality education as provided under Section 5(2) of Article XIV of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. The Constitution emphasizes the role of education in fostering civic consciousness, national unity, and development.

2. Formation and Structure

The incorporation and registration of educational corporations are governed by both the Revised Corporation Code (R.A. No. 11232) and additional regulations from the Department of Education (DepEd), Commission on Higher Education (CHED), or Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) depending on the level of education provided.

Key steps and requirements include:

• Articles of Incorporation: Educational corporations are required to include specific purposes in their Articles of Incorporation, detailing their educational objectives.
• Board Composition: Unlike typical corporations, which have flexibility in board membership, educational corporations often have governing boards that include representatives from faculty, administration, and occasionally, student bodies, ensuring that educational policies align with institutional goals.
• Approval from Educational Authorities: After incorporation, these corporations must secure permits and licenses from DepEd, CHED, or TESDA before they can legally operate. These permits ensure that educational standards are met.

3. Types of Educational Corporations

Educational corporations can generally be classified as follows:

• Non-Stock, Non-Profit Educational Corporations: These are the most common type and are set up with a non-profit purpose. They are dedicated solely to educational purposes without intent for profit distribution among members.
• Stock Educational Corporations: Though less common, some educational institutions are organized as stock corporations, meaning they operate with a profit motive. Stock educational corporations are often limited to private entities offering specialized, non-formal education, such as tutorial centers or technical training institutions.

4. Governance and Operation

• Board of Trustees or Directors: Governance of educational corporations follows either a Board of Trustees (non-stock) or Board of Directors (stock). In both cases, board members must act in the institution's best interests, prioritizing educational objectives over personal profit.
• Special Requirements for University Status: For educational corporations desiring to operate as universities, they must meet CHED's stringent requirements regarding academic programs, faculty qualifications, and research facilities.
• Corporate Life and Perpetual Succession: Educational corporations often receive a perpetual life under the RCC, meaning they continue to exist regardless of changes in membership or ownership, provided they comply with regulatory requirements.

5. Taxation of Educational Corporations

• Income Tax Exemption for Non-Profit Educational Corporations: Article XIV, Section 4(3) of the 1987 Constitution provides that non-stock, non-profit educational institutions are exempt from taxes on income used directly, actually, and exclusively for educational purposes. Additionally, they are exempt from property taxes on assets utilized in their educational mission.
• Application for Exemption: To avail of these exemptions, educational corporations must register with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) as non-profit educational entities and submit proof of income application towards educational purposes.
• For-Profit Educational Corporations: Educational corporations that operate as for-profit entities are subject to the standard corporate income tax rates and must comply with other BIR regulations concerning tax liabilities.

6. Accreditation and Quality Control

Educational corporations are subject to rigorous accreditation standards by the Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges, and Universities (PAASCU) and other accrediting bodies. Accreditation, while not mandatory, provides credibility, financial aid eligibility, and often affects licensing and permits from government bodies.

7. Supervision and Regulation

The regulatory framework involves several agencies:

• DepEd oversees primary and secondary educational institutions.
• CHED regulates higher education institutions (colleges and universities).
• TESDA manages technical and vocational education.

Educational corporations must submit annual reports to these regulatory bodies, including updates on faculty, curricula, and facilities, to ensure compliance with standards.

8. Compliance with Labor and Other Laws

Educational corporations must comply with labor laws, including the Labor Code and regulations regarding faculty tenure, wages, and benefits. They must also adhere to safety standards, student welfare laws, and laws regarding intellectual property, especially concerning curricula and research output.

Key Cases and Jurisprudence

Several cases have shaped the jurisprudence surrounding educational corporations:

• Non-Stock Non-Profit Educational Institutions Tax Exemption (Lladoc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue): The Supreme Court upheld that educational institutions exempted from income tax must apply all income toward educational purposes.
• Religious Affiliation and Educational Corporations (DECS v. San Beda College): Institutions with religious affiliation were found to retain their tax exemptions, provided their educational operations remained non-profit and religious doctrine was not the primary function.

Conclusion

Educational corporations in the Philippines play a critical role in the country’s educational landscape, and they are afforded unique benefits and responsibilities under Philippine law. From specific incorporation requirements to strict tax exemptions and regulatory oversight, these entities are structured to prioritize educational objectives over profit.

Close Corporation | Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Close Corporations under Philippine Law

In the Philippines, close corporations are regulated primarily under the Revised Corporation Code (RCC) of the Philippines, or Republic Act No. 11232, which outlines specific provisions for close corporations. A close corporation has distinct characteristics and requirements compared to other types of corporations, specifically tailored to maintain a small, tightly controlled ownership structure.

1. Definition of a Close Corporation

A close corporation is defined under Section 95 of the RCC as a corporation whose articles of incorporation specifically limit the number of stockholders to a maximum of 20 individuals. In a close corporation:

• Shares cannot be offered or sold publicly. This restriction means that shares in a close corporation cannot be traded in the open market or listed on a securities exchange.
• Restrictions on share transfers are put in place, typically by requiring shareholder consent before any transfer of shares. These restrictions are designed to maintain a controlled, limited ownership group.

2. Characteristics of a Close Corporation

The essential characteristics of a close corporation include:

• Limited Shareholders: The maximum number of shareholders allowed is 20, aligning it more with private ownership than a publicly-traded entity.
• Non-public Offering of Shares: The prohibition on public stock offering ensures that the ownership structure remains limited and prevents external shareholders from diluting the control of the existing owners.
• Share Transfer Restrictions: Transfers of shares may require approval from existing shareholders or directors to ensure that control of the corporation remains within a predefined circle of owners.
• Direct Involvement of Shareholders: Shareholders in a close corporation are often directly involved in the management and operation of the corporation, making it similar to a partnership in practical terms.

3. Formation Requirements

To establish a close corporation in the Philippines, the articles of incorporation must explicitly state that the corporation is a close corporation and comply with the following requirements:

• Name Requirements: The articles must specify that the corporation is a close corporation.
• Limitations on Transfer of Shares: Provisions to restrict the transfer of shares must be clearly outlined in the articles of incorporation.
• Maximum Number of Stockholders: The articles must specify that the total number of shareholders will not exceed 20 at any time.

These formation requirements are essential for the SEC to recognize a corporation as a close corporation, providing it with certain benefits under the RCC.

4. Management and Governance Structure

In a close corporation, management structure and governance can diverge from traditional corporate models:

• Flexible Management: Shareholders in a close corporation are often empowered to directly participate in management without the need for a separate board of directors. Section 96 of the RCC allows close corporations to operate without a board, provided that this structure is stated in the articles of incorporation.
• Director-Like Responsibilities for Shareholders: In the absence of a board, all shareholders may assume the role of directors, sharing responsibility for decision-making and corporate governance.
• Fiduciary Duty: Shareholders who directly manage a close corporation have fiduciary duties akin to those of directors in traditional corporations. They are obligated to act in the corporation’s best interest, maintaining loyalty and diligence.

5. Unique Rights and Restrictions in Close Corporations

The RCC grants certain rights and restrictions tailored for close corporations:

• Pre-emptive Rights: Shareholders have pre-emptive rights by default, allowing them to purchase additional shares in proportion to their current holdings before the corporation can offer these shares to outsiders. This helps maintain ownership structure and prevent dilution of control.
• Restriction on Deadlocks: In case of management or shareholder deadlocks, any shareholder may petition the court to resolve the issue, including potentially dissolving the corporation if the deadlock severely impairs its ability to function.
• Stock Transfer Limitations: Restrictions on stock transfers are enforceable, ensuring the corporation maintains a closely-held ownership structure. Section 97 of the RCC specifically allows the inclusion of provisions to restrict share transfers, provided these are documented in the articles of incorporation.

6. Benefits and Limitations

Benefits of a Close Corporation:

• Control and Flexibility: The close structure allows for streamlined decision-making and greater control, as shareholders are typically involved in day-to-day operations.
• Privacy in Operations: With no obligation to disclose information to public shareholders, close corporations maintain higher privacy levels regarding their financials and strategic decisions.
• Reduced Formalities: The RCC allows close corporations to operate with reduced formalities, which lowers operational costs and complexity.

Limitations of a Close Corporation:

• Limited Access to Capital Markets: Due to the prohibition on public offerings, close corporations may find it challenging to raise capital beyond the initial contributions from shareholders.
• Restrictions on Stock Transfers: The limitations on stock transfers can reduce liquidity for shareholders, making it more difficult to exit the corporation or realize the value of their shares.
• Potential for Conflict: With a small ownership base, personal relationships among shareholders can lead to conflicts that could affect corporate operations, particularly in the absence of formal governance structures like a board of directors.

7. Dissolution of Close Corporations

A close corporation can be dissolved in the following scenarios:

• Voluntary Dissolution: Shareholders may opt for voluntary dissolution, which requires a majority vote unless otherwise specified in the articles.
• Involuntary Dissolution due to Deadlock: A severe deadlock among shareholders or the inability to carry out corporate functions may lead to court-ordered dissolution.
• By Order of the SEC: If the corporation violates provisions in its articles, fails to maintain shareholder limits, or breaches regulatory requirements, the SEC may initiate dissolution proceedings.

Summary

Close corporations are structured for small groups of shareholders who wish to maintain a high degree of control and privacy over their business operations. Under Philippine law, they offer a unique blend of partnership-like flexibility with the limited liability of a corporation. However, these corporations also face restrictions, particularly in accessing capital and transferring shares, which reflect the balancing act between control and flexibility.

Non-Stock Corporation | Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Non-Stock Corporations in the Philippines

In the Philippine legal context, a non-stock corporation is defined and regulated under the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 11232). It is distinct from stock corporations, which are organized primarily for profit. Non-stock corporations, on the other hand, operate not for profit but for purposes such as charitable, educational, cultural, social, fraternal, literary, scientific, civic, or similar objectives.

Here's a comprehensive overview of non-stock corporations under Philippine law:

---

1. Definition and Legal Basis

• Section 86 of the Revised Corporation Code defines a non-stock corporation as a corporation that does not issue shares of stock and does not declare dividends.
• All income of a non-stock corporation is used in furthering the purpose(s) for which it was formed, without profit distribution to members.

2. Purposes and Objectives

• The purposes of a non-stock corporation must be aligned with its defined objectives under the Corporation Code. These typically include:
  • Charitable purposes, such as relief of poverty
  • Educational advancement or public awareness campaigns
  • Religious and spiritual missions
  • Cultural preservation and promotion
  • Social and civic initiatives

3. Formation and Membership

• Incorporators and Members: A non-stock corporation must have at least five incorporators, who must be natural persons of legal age. Unlike stock corporations, membership in a non-stock corporation is acquired through methods other than share ownership.
• Membership Classifications and Rights: Membership can be structured in various classifications, as provided by the corporation’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws. Each member has voting rights unless otherwise stated, but they have no proprietary interest in the corporation.

4. Capitalization and Funding

• Sources of Funds: Since non-stock corporations do not issue shares, their funds come from membership fees, donations, grants, and other forms of fundraising activities.
• Tax-Exempt Status and Deductions: Certain non-stock, non-profit corporations may qualify for tax exemptions under the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC), especially those organized for religious, charitable, scientific, athletic, cultural, and educational purposes, provided they meet BIR requirements and do not engage in profit-driven activities.

5. Management Structure and Governance

• Board of Trustees: Non-stock corporations are governed by a Board of Trustees (instead of Directors). Trustees must be members of the corporation, and a minimum of five trustees is required.
• Officers: The board elects officers, including a president, treasurer, and secretary, as provided in the Bylaws.
• Fiduciary Duties: Trustees and officers must act in the corporation’s best interest and are subject to fiduciary duties such as duty of care, loyalty, and obedience to the corporation’s purpose.

6. Dissolution and Distribution of Assets

• Upon dissolution, the assets of a non-stock corporation are not distributed to members but instead are donated to another institution with a similar purpose, as specified in the Articles of Incorporation.
• Liquidation Process: The corporation must comply with all requirements from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and any other relevant authorities.

7. Relevant Taxation Laws

• Non-stock corporations may enjoy tax exemptions on income related to their purpose, provided they satisfy BIR requirements. Certain laws and regulations govern taxation, such as:
  • Revenue Memorandum Circulars (RMC) by the BIR providing specific guidelines
  • Income Tax Exemption, subject to limitations under Section 30 of the NIRC

8. Corporate Reporting and Compliance

• Annual Reports: Non-stock corporations must submit annual financial statements and General Information Sheets (GIS) to the SEC.
• Corporate Governance Reporting: Those with public or quasi-public funds, such as foundations, may have additional reporting requirements.

9. Privileges and Limitations

• Privileges: Non-stock corporations may apply for accreditation with government agencies, enabling them to receive government grants or act as implementing partners for government projects.
• Limitations: They are prohibited from distributing profits to members, making them distinct from cooperatives or mutual benefit organizations which may operate similarly but allow profit distribution within certain constraints.

10. Legal Protections and Liabilities

• Corporate Personality and Liability Protection: Non-stock corporations enjoy a separate legal personality, shielding members from personal liability.
• Derivative Suits: Members may file suits on behalf of the corporation against its trustees or officers if there is any act against the corporation’s best interests.

Conclusion

Non-stock corporations play a crucial role in the Philippine corporate landscape, allowing organizations to operate in a not-for-profit capacity with specific tax and regulatory benefits. They are governed by stringent requirements under the Revised Corporation Code and the National Internal Revenue Code, with obligations to uphold their stated purposes and reinvest all resources into achieving those objectives.

Stock Corporation | Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Under Philippine law, the concept of corporations is fundamentally governed by the Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act No. 11232) and other relevant tax and mercantile legislation. Stock corporations, a critical type of business entity, are specifically designed to enable capital-raising through the issuance of shares to investors. Here is an exhaustive breakdown of the legal intricacies and regulatory guidelines surrounding stock corporations in the Philippines:

1. Definition of a Stock Corporation

A stock corporation, as per Section 3 of the Revised Corporation Code, is defined as a corporation with a capital stock divided into shares and authorized to distribute profits to its shareholders based on their shareholdings. This differentiates it from non-stock corporations, which do not issue shares and primarily focus on non-profit purposes.

2. Capital Structure and Shareholding

A stock corporation is structured around its capital stock, which is divided into shares and represented by share certificates. Key considerations include:

• Authorized Capital Stock: The maximum amount of capital that a corporation is legally permitted to raise by issuing shares. Stock corporations must declare this in their Articles of Incorporation.
• Subscribed Capital Stock: The portion of the authorized capital stock that shareholders commit to subscribe. It is part of the corporation’s equity but is not fully paid until required.
• Paid-Up Capital: The actual funds received by the corporation from shareholders. Under the Revised Corporation Code, the initial paid-up capital must be at least 25% of the subscribed capital stock or 25% of the authorized capital stock, whichever is lower.

3. Formation and Registration Requirements

The process to incorporate a stock corporation in the Philippines is stringent, with requirements outlined in the Revised Corporation Code:

• Articles of Incorporation: This foundational document must include the corporation’s name, purpose, term, principal office, authorized capital stock, names of incorporators, and details on the shares to be issued.
• Bylaws: Stock corporations must adopt bylaws within one month after receiving their Certificate of Incorporation. Bylaws are essential for establishing the internal governance structure, including board meetings, shareholder rights, and director responsibilities.

4. Classification of Shares

Philippine law allows corporations to issue different types of shares, which serve various investor rights and corporate finance functions. These include:

• Common Shares: These shares carry voting rights, enabling shareholders to participate in corporate decision-making, and typically grant entitlement to dividends, subject to board approval.
• Preferred Shares: Holders of preferred shares often do not have voting rights but may receive dividends at a fixed rate and priority over common shareholders in the distribution of assets in liquidation.
• Treasury Shares: Previously issued shares that the corporation buys back from existing shareholders and holds without retiring them. Treasury shares do not have voting rights and do not earn dividends.
• Redeemable Shares: These shares can be repurchased or redeemed by the corporation at a specified date or upon demand of the corporation, subject to provisions in the Articles of Incorporation.

5. Governing Bodies and Corporate Governance

The primary governing bodies of a stock corporation are the Board of Directors and the General Shareholders’ Meeting:

• Board of Directors: The board has oversight and policy-making authority, setting strategic direction, approving budgets, and deciding on major corporate actions. Directors must act in the best interest of the corporation, bound by fiduciary duties of loyalty and diligence.
• Shareholders’ Meetings: Key decisions, including amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, election of directors, and major asset disposals, require shareholder approval. Voting is typically based on the number of shares held, with certain resolutions necessitating a majority or supermajority vote.

6. Dividend Distribution

Stock corporations may distribute profits in the form of dividends, which are classified as:

• Cash Dividends: Distributed in cash to shareholders, subject to sufficient retained earnings and board approval.
• Stock Dividends: Additional shares issued to shareholders from retained earnings, which does not involve cash payout but dilutes share value.
• Property Dividends: Distribution of assets other than cash or stock, often requiring consent from shareholders, especially if the property differs significantly in value from cash equivalents.

7. Corporate Taxation

Stock corporations in the Philippines are subject to corporate income tax and other related taxes, including:

• Corporate Income Tax: Currently set at a standard rate of 25% for most domestic corporations, though smaller enterprises with net taxable income below PHP 5 million and total assets below PHP 100 million are taxed at a lower rate of 20%.
• Minimum Corporate Income Tax (MCIT): Imposed on corporations with insufficient gross income for two consecutive years, calculated at 2% of gross income.
• Dividend Tax: Dividends paid to domestic shareholders are exempt from tax. However, dividends distributed to foreign shareholders may be subject to withholding tax unless reduced or exempted under an applicable tax treaty.
• Final Withholding Tax: A final tax of 10% is imposed on cash and property dividends issued to individual Filipino residents.

8. Reporting and Compliance Obligations

Stock corporations must adhere to ongoing regulatory requirements to maintain their legal standing:

• Annual Financial Statements (AFS): Submitted to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), detailing financial performance and compliance with tax obligations.
• General Information Sheet (GIS): Filed with the SEC annually, the GIS contains information on the corporation's structure, shareholder list, and relevant changes in capital.
• Tax Compliance: Corporations must file various tax returns (e.g., Quarterly and Annual Income Tax Returns, VAT or Percentage Tax Returns, and Withholding Tax Returns) and comply with the required payment schedules set by the BIR.

9. Dissolution and Liquidation

A stock corporation may be dissolved voluntarily by a vote of the board and shareholders or involuntarily through administrative or judicial action if it fails to comply with regulatory requirements or becomes insolvent. Upon dissolution:

• Liquidation Process: The corporation’s assets are distributed to creditors, and any remaining assets are distributed to shareholders based on the priority of shareholding and claims.
• Final Tax Obligations: The corporation must settle final taxes, submit tax clearance certificates, and file final corporate reports with the SEC and BIR.

Conclusion

Stock corporations in the Philippines serve as a robust business vehicle for raising capital and facilitating profit-sharing among shareholders. The Revised Corporation Code provides a detailed framework governing their formation, operations, and dissolution. This legal structure, combined with shareholder rights and corporate governance regulations, underpins the corporate landscape and ensures that stock corporations remain viable, compliant, and attractive for investment in the Philippines.

Kinds of Corporation | Corporations | BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

In the Philippine legal context, corporations are defined and regulated under the Revised Corporation Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 11232), enacted in 2019. The Code categorizes corporations based on various factors such as purpose, membership, capital structure, and whether they are publicly listed or privately held. This classification system ensures that corporations operate within a defined structure, maximizing legal clarity and business efficiency.

Here is a comprehensive discussion on the kinds of corporations under Philippine law:

1. Classification Based on Legal Structure and Purpose

• Stock Corporations
  Stock corporations are organized primarily for profit and have capital divided into shares. Shareholders hold ownership through stocks, entitling them to profits in the form of dividends. The Revised Corporation Code (RCC) specifies that stock corporations are required to distribute any profits to their shareholders, following the proportion of their shares.

• Non-Stock Corporations
  Non-stock corporations are established for purposes other than profit, typically for social, charitable, educational, cultural, or similar objectives. Instead of shares, these corporations have members who contribute to the corporation’s purpose. They do not distribute dividends but use their income to further their mission.

2. Classification Based on Nationality

• Domestic Corporations
  A corporation is classified as domestic if it is incorporated under Philippine law. A domestic corporation is a juridical entity created and existing under the Philippines' jurisdiction and is bound by all the laws applicable within the country.

• Foreign Corporations
  A corporation organized and existing under the laws of a foreign country is classified as a foreign corporation. Foreign corporations seeking to do business in the Philippines are required to obtain a license from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and adhere to Philippine regulatory requirements.

3. Classification Based on Control and Ownership

• Close Corporations
  Close corporations limit the number of shareholders, often capped at 20, and restrict the transferability of shares. These corporations allow shareholders more flexibility in governance as they often have exemptions from certain formalities, like board meetings, provided they conform to the conditions set forth in the RCC. In close corporations, directors and shareholders are often the same individuals.

• Publicly Held Corporations
  Publicly held corporations (or publicly listed corporations) offer shares to the general public and are listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). They are subject to stringent regulatory oversight by the SEC and the PSE, focusing on transparency, disclosure, and governance standards. Publicly held corporations must meet specific requirements, including minimum public ownership thresholds and regular disclosure obligations.

• One-Person Corporation (OPC)
  An OPC is a corporation with a single shareholder, who may be a natural person, trust, or estate. OPCs were introduced in the RCC to facilitate easier business formation, especially for sole proprietors. They provide the benefit of limited liability to the single stockholder, with fewer compliance requirements than other corporate structures.

4. Classification Based on Regulatory Function

• Quasi-Banking Corporations
  Quasi-banking corporations, such as financing and investment companies, are authorized to perform quasi-banking functions like lending, deposit-taking, or similar financial services under the supervision of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). These corporations must meet specific capital adequacy requirements and adhere to BSP regulations to protect public interest and ensure financial stability.

• Government-Owned or Controlled Corporations (GOCCs)
  GOCCs are corporations with the Philippine government as the primary or controlling shareholder. They operate under both the Revised Corporation Code and special laws specific to their mandate, such as the Government Owned or Controlled Corporations Governance Act (R.A. 10149). GOCCs serve national interests and are accountable to government agencies, including the Governance Commission for GOCCs (GCG).

5. Special Types of Corporations under the Revised Corporation Code

• Educational Corporations
  Educational corporations are organized exclusively for educational purposes, following the Revised Corporation Code and the Department of Education (DepEd) or Commission on Higher Education (CHED) regulations. Non-stock, non-profit corporations often register as educational corporations, meeting specific standards related to their educational mission.

• Religious Corporations
  Religious corporations are established for religious purposes and operate within the specific guidelines of the RCC. There are two primary types:

  • Corporation Sole: A single member, typically a bishop or religious leader, serves as the corporation's head and legal entity.
  • Religious Societies: These are more collective organizations with a board of trustees, like other non-stock corporations.

6. Classification Based on Existence and Tenure

• De Jure Corporations
  A de jure corporation is one that fully complies with all legal requirements under the Revised Corporation Code, making it a valid and legally recognized entity. De jure corporations have the benefit of corporate protections against claims questioning their legitimacy.

• De Facto Corporations
  De facto corporations are those that operate as corporations despite certain procedural defects in their formation. Philippine law recognizes de facto corporations if they meet three conditions:

  1. A valid law under which the entity could be incorporated.
  2. An effort to comply with the legal requirements.
  3. Actual use of corporate powers. This status provides temporary protection, but the corporation is vulnerable to challenges in court.

• Corporations by Estoppel
  Corporations by estoppel arise when individuals act as a corporation without legally incorporating. While they are not recognized as legitimate corporations, parties involved in corporations by estoppel may be held personally liable for corporate obligations if their actions mislead third parties.

7. Classification Based on Public Benefit and Impact

• Public Corporations
  Public corporations are entities created for government or municipal functions, such as barangays, municipalities, and provinces. They exist to serve the public and often do not pursue profit, operating under their enabling laws rather than under the Revised Corporation Code.

• Private Corporations
  Private corporations are established for private benefit, such as commercial enterprises, and fall under the provisions of the RCC. These corporations have no governmental purpose and operate independently of public entities, serving the interests of their shareholders.

8. Classification Based on Duration

• Perpetual Corporations
  Under the RCC, all corporations now have perpetual existence unless otherwise specified in their articles of incorporation. This provision marks a significant shift from prior law, which required corporations to renew their corporate life periodically.

• Fixed-Term Corporations
  Corporations may also choose to set a limited duration in their articles of incorporation, particularly if they aim to operate for a defined project or purpose. Upon expiration of their term, they may renew by amending their articles, subject to SEC approval.

9. Classification Based on Investment Type

• Holding Companies
  A holding company is formed to hold and manage equity investments in other corporations. These companies usually do not produce goods or services but exist to control and manage their subsidiary companies.

• Subsidiary Corporations
  A subsidiary corporation is a company controlled by another corporation, known as the parent company, which owns a significant portion (usually more than 50%) of the subsidiary’s stock. They operate as independent entities but align with the parent company’s overall strategy.

Summary

The Revised Corporation Code provides a detailed and structured approach to categorizing corporations to meet various business and regulatory needs in the Philippines. Each type serves a specific function, allowing businesses to select structures that align with their goals and operational needs while ensuring compliance with Philippine law.

Law of the Sea | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Law of the Sea (Under Public International Law)

The Law of the Sea, a crucial component of public international law, governs the rights and responsibilities of states in maritime environments. This legal framework provides comprehensive guidelines regarding the use and protection of the world's oceans and marine resources, including delineation of boundaries, exploitation of resources, and environmental protection. The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is the most significant and widely accepted treaty on this subject.

Key Components of the Law of the Sea:

1. Baselines and Internal Waters

   • Baselines: The baseline is the low-water line along the coast from which the seaward limits of a state's maritime zones are measured. Article 5 of UNCLOS provides that normal baselines are to follow the coastline.
   • Straight Baselines: In areas where the coastline is deeply indented or has fringe islands, states can employ straight baselines connecting appropriate points (Article 7 of UNCLOS).
   • Internal Waters: Waters on the landward side of the baseline are internal waters. A coastal state has full sovereignty over these waters, akin to its land territory.

2. Territorial Sea

   • A state’s sovereignty extends to a belt of sea up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline (Article 3 of UNCLOS). This sovereignty includes airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below the sea.
   • The coastal state has the right to regulate activities such as navigation, fishing, and resource exploitation within the territorial sea.
   • Innocent Passage: Ships of other states have the right to innocent passage through the territorial sea (Article 17). Passage must be continuous and expeditious and should not threaten the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state (Article 19).

3. Contiguous Zone

   • Beyond the territorial sea, a state may claim a contiguous zone extending up to 24 nautical miles from the baseline (Article 33 of UNCLOS).
   • In this zone, the coastal state can exercise control necessary to prevent and punish infringements of its customs, fiscal, immigration, or sanitary laws within its territory or territorial sea.

4. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)

   • The EEZ extends up to 200 nautical miles from the baseline (Articles 55-57 of UNCLOS).
   • Within this zone, the coastal state has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing natural resources (living or non-living) in the waters, seabed, and subsoil.
   • Other states have freedom of navigation and overflight, as well as the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, provided they respect the rights of the coastal state.

5. Continental Shelf

   • The continental shelf is the natural prolongation of a coastal state's land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin, or 200 nautical miles from the baseline if the continental margin does not extend that far (Article 76 of UNCLOS).
   • The coastal state has exclusive rights to explore and exploit the resources of the continental shelf, including mineral and non-living resources of the seabed and subsoil, as well as sedentary species.
   • States can extend their continental shelf claims beyond 200 nautical miles if the natural prolongation of their land territory meets the criteria set forth by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS).

6. High Seas

   • The high seas are the areas of the sea beyond national jurisdiction (beyond the EEZ). These waters are open to all states (Article 87 of UNCLOS). No state may claim sovereignty over the high seas.
   • All states enjoy freedom of navigation, overflight, fishing, scientific research, and the laying of cables and pipelines.
   • UNCLOS obliges states to cooperate in the conservation and management of marine resources in the high seas, particularly concerning migratory and straddling fish stocks.

7. International Seabed Area (The Area)

   • The seabed and ocean floor beyond national jurisdiction, known as "The Area," is considered the common heritage of mankind (Article 136 of UNCLOS). No state may claim sovereignty over any part of The Area or its resources.
   • Activities in The Area, particularly the exploration and exploitation of resources, are administered by the International Seabed Authority (ISA), established under UNCLOS to regulate these activities and ensure that benefits are shared equitably among all nations, particularly developing states.

8. Straits Used for International Navigation

   • Straits used for international navigation are natural waterways connecting one part of the high seas or an EEZ to another part of the high seas or EEZ.
   • Transit Passage: In such straits, ships and aircraft of all states enjoy the right of transit passage (Article 38 of UNCLOS). This right is broader than innocent passage as it allows uninterrupted and expeditious transit without the coastal state being able to suspend passage.
   • The coastal state may adopt laws and regulations for safety, environmental protection, and the prevention of accidents in the strait, but cannot impede transit passage.

9. Archipelagic States

   • An archipelagic state consists of a group of islands forming a coherent geographical, economic, and political unit (Article 46 of UNCLOS). The Philippines, being an archipelagic state, is an example.
   • Such states may draw archipelagic baselines joining the outermost points of the outermost islands, enclosing the islands and waters within as archipelagic waters.
   • Foreign vessels have the right of archipelagic sea lanes passage, which is similar to transit passage, through designated sea lanes or routes used for international navigation.

10. Marine Environmental Protection

    • States are obligated under UNCLOS to protect and preserve the marine environment (Article 192). They must take measures to prevent, reduce, and control pollution of the marine environment from various sources, including land-based activities, vessels, and seabed activities (Articles 194-196).
    • States are required to cooperate globally and regionally to develop and enforce international rules and standards for the protection of the marine environment.

11. Settlement of Disputes

    • UNCLOS provides a comprehensive system for the peaceful settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of its provisions (Part XV).
    • States parties may resort to various mechanisms, including the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), or arbitration under Annex VII of UNCLOS.
    • Disputes related to maritime boundaries, resource rights, and environmental obligations are common issues resolved through these mechanisms.

12. Piracy and Illegal Activities

    • Piracy: Defined as illegal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for private ends on the high seas or in a place beyond the jurisdiction of any state (Article 101 of UNCLOS).
    • States have a duty to cooperate in repressing piracy, and any state may seize a pirate ship, arrest pirates, and prosecute them under its domestic law (Article 105).
    • Illegal Fishing and Trafficking: UNCLOS obligates states to cooperate in preventing illegal fishing and human trafficking, as well as other criminal activities in the sea.

13. Philippines and the Law of the Sea

    • As a signatory to UNCLOS, the Philippines has enacted domestic legislation aligned with its international obligations. Republic Act No. 9522 (Philippine Archipelagic Baselines Law) defines the archipelagic baselines in accordance with UNCLOS.
    • The Philippines has invoked UNCLOS in its arbitration case against China in the South China Sea (West Philippine Sea) dispute, wherein the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) issued a landmark ruling in 2016, favoring the Philippines’ claim that China’s historic rights claims, based on its "nine-dash line," were inconsistent with UNCLOS.

Conclusion

The Law of the Sea establishes a balance between the rights and obligations of coastal and land-locked states, ensuring the fair use and conservation of marine resources. It is vital for regulating maritime activities and resolving disputes, particularly for a nation like the Philippines, which is heavily reliant on its maritime domain for resources, security, and transportation. The Law of the Sea is thus a cornerstone of international cooperation and environmental stewardship.

International Environmental Law | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

International Environmental Law

International Environmental Law is a branch of public international law that governs the protection of the global environment. It involves legal norms, principles, and treaties created to prevent, mitigate, and manage environmental issues that transcend national borders. This body of law seeks to reconcile the right of sovereign states to exploit their natural resources with the need to preserve the global environment for present and future generations.

Key Concepts in International Environmental Law

1. State Sovereignty and Responsibility

   • States have sovereignty over their natural resources, as recognized by customary international law and various treaties, including the United Nations Charter.
   • However, this sovereignty is limited by the principle that activities within a state’s jurisdiction should not cause environmental harm beyond its borders (principle of no-harm rule or transboundary harm). This principle is codified in the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development and is a key tenet of customary international law.

2. Sustainable Development

   • Sustainable development is a central concept in international environmental law. It was notably advanced in the 1987 Brundtland Report and codified in the Rio Declaration of 1992.
   • Sustainable development emphasizes that development should meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
   • It integrates economic development, social development, and environmental protection as interdependent and mutually reinforcing pillars.

3. Precautionary Principle

   • This principle asserts that where there is a threat of serious or irreversible environmental harm, the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.
   • It is enshrined in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration and various multilateral environmental agreements, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992).

4. Polluter Pays Principle

   • The polluter pays principle mandates that those who cause environmental harm should bear the costs of managing or preventing such harm. This principle is widely recognized in both national and international law.
   • Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration formalizes this concept and ensures that the economic burden of pollution does not fall on the general public or future generations.

5. Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR)

   • CBDR is a principle that acknowledges that while all states are responsible for addressing global environmental issues, they do not bear equal responsibility. Developed nations, having historically contributed more to environmental degradation, are expected to take the lead in addressing these issues.
   • The principle is found in Principle 7 of the Rio Declaration and forms a cornerstone of treaties such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement under the UNFCCC.

Key Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs)

International Environmental Law is mainly developed through multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs). These treaties address a wide range of issues, including climate change, biodiversity, marine pollution, and hazardous waste.

1. Stockholm Declaration (1972)

   • The Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment marked the first major international gathering focusing on environmental issues. It led to the establishment of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and laid the groundwork for future environmental treaties.
   • The Stockholm Declaration includes 26 principles, emphasizing the need for a healthy environment and outlining state responsibilities.

2. Rio Declaration (1992)

   • Adopted at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, this declaration contains 27 principles aimed at guiding states in environmental protection and sustainable development.
   • The Agenda 21, a non-binding action plan on sustainable development, was also adopted during this conference.

3. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992)

   • The UNFCCC is the primary international treaty to address climate change. It sets an overarching framework for global action to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations and mitigate the effects of global warming.
   • The convention was supplemented by the legally binding Kyoto Protocol (1997) and later by the Paris Agreement (2015), which aims to limit global temperature rise to below 2°C, ideally to 1.5°C, above pre-industrial levels.

4. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 1992)

   • The CBD aims to conserve biological diversity, promote sustainable use of its components, and ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources.
   • It also gave rise to additional protocols, such as the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.

5. Kyoto Protocol (1997)

   • An international agreement under the UNFCCC, the Kyoto Protocol imposes legally binding emission reduction targets on developed countries. It operates on the principle of CBDR, placing heavier obligations on industrialized nations to combat climate change.
   • The Protocol established mechanisms such as Emissions Trading, Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), and Joint Implementation to help states meet their commitments.

6. Paris Agreement (2015)

   • The Paris Agreement under the UNFCCC replaced the Kyoto Protocol as the main instrument for addressing climate change.
   • It aims to limit global warming to well below 2°C, with an ambition to reduce it to 1.5°C. It establishes a framework for national commitments known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
   • The agreement also focuses on adaptation, climate finance, and loss and damage due to climate change.

7. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES, 1973)

   • CITES regulates international trade in endangered species to ensure that such trade does not threaten their survival.
   • The convention provides various levels of protection to more than 35,000 species of animals and plants through a permit system.

8. Basel Convention (1989)

   • The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal seeks to reduce the generation of hazardous wastes and control their cross-border movement.
   • It promotes the disposal of hazardous wastes close to the source of generation and prohibits shipments of waste to countries lacking the capacity to manage them safely.

9. Montreal Protocol (1987)

   • The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer is one of the most successful environmental treaties. It aims to phase out the production and consumption of ozone-depleting substances (ODS).
   • The protocol has been amended multiple times, most notably by the Kigali Amendment (2016), which targets the phase-down of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potent greenhouse gases.

10. UNCLOS and Marine Protection

    • The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982) governs various aspects of marine law, including the protection of the marine environment. Part XII of UNCLOS obliges states to take measures to prevent, reduce, and control pollution of the marine environment from land-based sources, seabed activities, and vessels.
    • Additional agreements related to marine protection include the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL, 1973) and the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (London Convention, 1972).

Enforcement and Compliance Mechanisms

1. National Implementation

   • Treaties typically require states to adopt implementing legislation or policies at the national level. Compliance is primarily based on good faith and reciprocity.

2. International Dispute Resolution

   • Dispute resolution mechanisms include arbitration, negotiation, and adjudication through bodies such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Permanent Court of Arbitration.

3. Non-Compliance Mechanisms (NCMs)

   • Several treaties establish NCMs to address cases where states fail to meet their treaty obligations. These mechanisms are non-adversarial and aim to facilitate compliance through dialogue and assistance, rather than punitive measures. For example, the Kyoto Protocol and the Montreal Protocol both include NCMs to handle compliance issues.

4. Monitoring and Reporting

   • Many environmental treaties require regular reporting and monitoring of compliance. For example, under the Paris Agreement, states must submit their NDCs and report on progress through a transparent review process.

Emerging Issues in International Environmental Law

1. Climate Change and Loss & Damage

   • Climate change is increasingly recognized as a threat to global security and human rights. The issue of loss and damage—the harm caused by climate impacts that cannot be avoided—is a pressing concern, particularly for vulnerable countries.

2. Biodiversity Loss

   • The rapid loss of biodiversity poses a serious risk to ecosystems and human livelihoods. Efforts to address this issue include the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, which is expected to set new targets for biodiversity conservation.

3. Plastic Pollution

   • The growing threat of plastic pollution, particularly in oceans, has prompted calls for a global treaty to address the lifecycle of plastics, from production to disposal.

Conclusion

International Environmental Law plays a vital role in addressing global environmental challenges. Through principles like sustainable development, the precautionary approach, and common but differentiated responsibilities, the international community seeks to balance economic development with environmental protection. Multilateral environmental agreements and their enforcement mechanisms form the backbone of this legal framework, ensuring that states cooperate in addressing issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. With emerging issues like plastic pollution and loss and damage from climate change, international environmental law continues to evolve to meet the needs of the global community.

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR JUDICIAL INNOVATIONS 2022- 2027

Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027: Political Law and Public International Law

The Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 (SPJI) is a crucial roadmap by the Philippine judiciary designed to revolutionize the justice system. It focuses on enhancing the judiciary's efficiency, transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in delivering justice. This plan is anchored on significant principles of Political Law and Public International Law, aiming to align the domestic legal system with global standards while safeguarding constitutional principles.

I. Overview of the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027

The SPJI was crafted to respond to the evolving needs of the Philippine judicial system, driven by the Supreme Court. Its primary goal is to modernize the judiciary through innovations that respond to issues of efficiency, technology adoption, human rights protection, and international legal compliance. These strategic objectives require the judiciary to adapt both political and international law frameworks.

The key areas of focus are:

1. Access to Justice – Strengthening judicial accessibility for marginalized sectors and enhancing the speed and quality of court services.
2. Judicial Efficiency and Case Management – Introducing technological advancements such as automated case tracking systems, digitization of court records, and promoting alternative dispute resolution.
3. Transparency and Accountability – Creating a more transparent judiciary that can hold its institutions accountable for judicial actions.
4. International Legal Cooperation – Aligning the judiciary with international standards, including treaties and conventions on human rights, criminal justice, and anti-corruption.

II. Political Law Context

Political law, which deals with the structure and function of government, its institutions, and the relationship between the state and its citizens, is central to the SPJI. The judiciary, being a co-equal branch of government, must adhere to political law principles while implementing the SPJI. Below are the main components of political law affected by the plan:

1. Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence

The judiciary's independence is a bedrock principle of political law in the Philippines. The SPJI emphasizes maintaining judicial independence while innovating. The plan envisions reforms that respect the constitutional distribution of powers but aim to improve the judiciary’s functioning. Modernization efforts are focused on ensuring that the judicial branch operates autonomously from the executive and legislative branches, without undermining its check-and-balance role.

2. Judicial Accountability

The SPJI reinforces the importance of accountability within the judiciary. Political law principles mandate that all government institutions, including courts, be subject to scrutiny to avoid abuses of power. The introduction of performance metrics, transparency in judicial decision-making, and real-time public access to court rulings align with constitutional guarantees for accountability.

3. Due Process and Equal Protection

A significant political law principle underpinning the SPJI is due process and equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Philippine Constitution. The SPJI commits to reforms that enhance access to justice for underprivileged citizens, ensuring they receive fair treatment. This includes enhancing the judiciary’s capacity to provide equal justice regardless of socio-economic status, a critical aspect of the right to due process and equal protection.

III. Public International Law Dimension

The SPJI’s ambitions are not confined to domestic improvements. It also seeks to ensure that the Philippine judiciary meets international standards, particularly in the context of Public International Law. These objectives reflect the country’s commitment to its international obligations under various treaties and conventions.

1. Compliance with International Human Rights Standards

The SPJI reinforces the judiciary's role in upholding international human rights obligations. As a signatory to numerous human rights treaties—such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)—the Philippines is required to implement these commitments through its judicial processes.

• The plan calls for continuous training of judges and court staff on international human rights law to ensure that judicial decisions align with global human rights standards.
• There is also a push to enhance judicial sensitivity to human rights cases, particularly in relation to extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and discrimination cases, all of which require specialized legal frameworks.

2. Cross-Border Legal Cooperation and Extradition

The SPJI aims to strengthen international cooperation in areas like extradition, mutual legal assistance, and enforcement of foreign judgments. This is crucial in light of the growing complexities of transnational crimes such as human trafficking, terrorism, and cybercrime.

The plan calls for the modernization of laws governing extradition and mutual legal assistance, as well as the development of court technologies to facilitate quicker responses to international requests for legal assistance.

3. International Criminal Law and the International Criminal Court (ICC)

Though the Philippines withdrew from the Rome Statute in 2019, the SPJI recognizes that the judiciary must still address international criminal law issues. This includes considering the implications of universal jurisdiction and how the Philippines engages with international bodies investigating crimes such as genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.

While the Philippines may no longer be a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the plan ensures that Philippine courts are still prepared to handle serious crimes in line with international legal standards.

IV. Key Innovations in the Judiciary (2022-2027)

Several key judicial innovations have been identified to achieve the goals of the SPJI within the framework of political law and public international law:

1. E-Courts and Digitization of Judicial Processes

The judiciary will shift towards a fully digital system, which includes:

• E-courts with case management systems, enabling swift tracking and resolution of cases.
• Digitized records and electronic filing, enhancing both efficiency and transparency.

2. AI and Legal Analytics

The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for legal research and case analysis is expected to improve judicial decision-making and reduce delays.

3. Enhanced Legal Education and Judicial Training

The SPJI emphasizes continual training of judges and court personnel, focusing on international law and human rights principles. This ensures that the judiciary is well-versed in both domestic and global legal standards.

4. Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

The judiciary will promote ADR mechanisms, particularly arbitration, mediation, and conciliation. These processes help decongest the courts and offer more expedient resolutions in line with international dispute resolution standards.

5. Public Engagement and Transparency

The judiciary will also engage in outreach to enhance public trust and transparency, with an emphasis on making the legal system more comprehensible to the general public. This includes real-time access to decisions, live-streaming of court proceedings, and publication of key rulings in major local languages.

V. Conclusion

The Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 is a comprehensive roadmap for modernizing the Philippine judiciary. It balances adherence to political law principles like separation of powers and due process with a forward-looking approach to meet the challenges of globalization through compliance with public international law. By fostering technological innovation, enhancing accountability, and aligning with international legal standards, the SPJI aims to create a more responsive, transparent, and efficient judiciary capable of upholding the rule of law in a rapidly changing world.

Jurisdiction of States | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Jurisdiction of States in Public International Law

Jurisdiction in the context of Public International Law refers to the legal authority of a state to regulate or exercise power over persons, property, and events. Jurisdiction reflects a state’s sovereign rights and responsibilities and is closely tied to the principles of state sovereignty, non-intervention, and territorial integrity. The scope and limits of state jurisdiction are determined by customary international law, treaties, and general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. State jurisdiction is typically categorized into three main types: legislative, executive, and judicial jurisdiction.

1. Types of State Jurisdiction

a. Legislative Jurisdiction

• Refers to a state's authority to make laws that regulate conduct. Legislative jurisdiction allows a state to prescribe rules that apply within its territory and, in certain circumstances, outside its territory.
• Basis of Legislative Jurisdiction:
  • Territorial Principle: A state may legislate over acts or persons within its territory.
  • Nationality Principle: A state may extend its laws to its nationals, even when they are abroad.
  • Protective Principle: A state may enact laws that protect its essential security interests from external threats.
  • Passive Personality Principle: A state may legislate over crimes committed abroad if its nationals are the victims.
  • Universality Principle: A state can enact laws over certain crimes, like piracy or genocide, which are considered offenses against the entire international community.

b. Executive Jurisdiction

• Refers to a state's authority to enforce its laws. Enforcement jurisdiction typically takes place within a state’s borders, but under certain circumstances, it can extend beyond them, provided it does not violate the sovereignty of other states.
• Limitations on Executive Jurisdiction:
  • International law prohibits a state from exercising enforcement jurisdiction on the territory of another state without the latter's consent.
  • Exceptions include cooperation under treaties (e.g., extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance treaties).

c. Judicial Jurisdiction

• Refers to the power of a state's courts to try cases and render judgments. It is exercised when courts claim the authority to hear and decide disputes.
• Basis of Judicial Jurisdiction:
  • Territorial Principle: A state’s courts may try cases arising within its borders.
  • Nationality: Courts may exercise jurisdiction over their nationals for acts committed abroad.
  • Universal Jurisdiction: For grave international crimes, such as war crimes or crimes against humanity, a state may exercise jurisdiction irrespective of where the crime occurred or the nationality of the perpetrators or victims.

2. Principles Limiting or Expanding Jurisdiction

a. Territorial Jurisdiction

• Territorial Principle: States have exclusive jurisdiction within their borders. This is the most fundamental principle of state sovereignty in international law. However, international law recognizes that a state’s jurisdiction may have extraterritorial applications in certain cases, provided that these applications do not infringe on the sovereignty of another state.

b. Nationality Jurisdiction

• States may assert jurisdiction over their nationals regardless of where they are located. This allows states to regulate the behavior of their citizens even when they are abroad.
• The active nationality principle extends a state’s jurisdiction to acts committed by its citizens abroad.
• The passive personality principle, on the other hand, allows a state to claim jurisdiction based on the nationality of the victim of an offense, even if the offense occurs outside the state's borders.

c. Protective Principle

• This principle allows a state to claim jurisdiction over conduct that threatens its security or vital interests, even when the conduct occurs outside the state’s territory. This principle is typically invoked in cases involving espionage, terrorism, or counterfeiting of the state’s currency.

d. Universality Principle

• The universality principle allows a state to claim jurisdiction over certain heinous crimes, regardless of where they occurred or the nationality of the perpetrator or victim. Crimes like piracy, genocide, torture, slavery, and war crimes fall under universal jurisdiction. The rationale behind this principle is that such crimes are considered to affect the international community as a whole, and all states have an interest in prosecuting them.

e. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction

• A state may extend its jurisdiction beyond its borders in certain cases, but international law requires that such extensions of jurisdiction respect the sovereignty of other states.
• Examples include:
  • Flag State Jurisdiction: A state may exercise jurisdiction over vessels flying its flag on the high seas or over aircraft registered in its territory.
  • Extraterritorial application of laws: Some states apply their laws extraterritorially, such as the U.S. through the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which applies to U.S. nationals and entities, including acts committed outside the U.S.
  • Extradition: States may request the surrender of an individual from another state to face prosecution or serve a sentence.

3. Diplomatic and Consular Immunity

• Diplomatic agents, consular officers, and certain international organization officials are granted immunity from the jurisdiction of the host state by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963).
• Diplomatic immunity provides broad protection, shielding diplomats from criminal, civil, and administrative jurisdiction. This is essential for maintaining diplomatic relations between states.
• Consular immunity is more limited, typically covering only official acts performed in the exercise of consular functions.

4. State Immunity and the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity

• The principle of sovereign immunity protects states from being sued in the courts of another state without their consent. This is based on the notion of equality of states and non-interference in a state’s internal affairs.
• Absolute immunity: Under traditional international law, states enjoyed absolute immunity from foreign jurisdiction. However, this has been modified in recent decades by the adoption of the restrictive theory of state immunity.
• Restrictive immunity: Today, many states adopt a restrictive approach to state immunity, which distinguishes between acts of a sovereign nature (acts jure imperii) and acts of a commercial or private nature (acts jure gestionis). States can claim immunity for sovereign acts but not for private or commercial acts, which may be subject to foreign jurisdiction.
• Exceptions to state immunity: States may not invoke immunity in cases involving commercial transactions, human rights violations, and international crimes like torture and war crimes.

5. Jurisdiction Over the High Seas

• Flag State Jurisdiction: A state has jurisdiction over vessels registered under its flag, even when they are on the high seas. The flag state has the authority to regulate the conduct of its vessels and the individuals on board.
• Universal Jurisdiction on the High Seas: Certain crimes, like piracy, are subject to universal jurisdiction, meaning any state may apprehend and prosecute the offenders.
• Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): While coastal states have certain rights in their EEZ, such as resource exploitation, other states retain freedom of navigation, and the coastal state’s jurisdiction is limited to specific matters like marine pollution or fisheries.

6. Jurisdiction Over International Crimes

• Crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and torture are subject to international prosecution. These crimes can be prosecuted under universal jurisdiction or by international tribunals such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), created under the Rome Statute.

• International Criminal Court (ICC):

  • The ICC has jurisdiction over the most serious international crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. States parties to the Rome Statute have consented to the ICC's jurisdiction, but the ICC may also exercise jurisdiction when a case is referred by the UN Security Council.

Conclusion

In Public International Law, the jurisdiction of states is a manifestation of their sovereignty. However, the exercise of jurisdiction is not unlimited and must be balanced with the principles of territorial sovereignty, non-interference, and international cooperation. States derive their jurisdiction from various principles, including territoriality, nationality, protection, and universality, and while jurisdiction is typically confined within a state’s borders, certain exceptions exist, particularly in relation to international crimes and threats to global security. The balancing of these principles is central to maintaining order and predictability in the international legal system.

Basis of Jurisdiction | Jurisdiction of States | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Basis of Jurisdiction of States in Public International Law

In public international law, the concept of jurisdiction refers to the legal authority of a state to regulate, adjudicate, and enforce its laws. The jurisdiction of a state is inherently tied to its sovereignty and is a critical aspect of how states interact with each other and with individuals or entities within and outside their territories. A state’s jurisdiction is essential for maintaining law and order and enforcing its legal norms, but it is also limited by principles of international law to ensure respect for the sovereignty of other states.

The basis of jurisdiction of states can be categorized into several key principles, each delineating the circumstances under which a state may assert its authority. These principles include:

---

1. Territorial Jurisdiction

This is the most fundamental basis of jurisdiction. A state has the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over all persons, properties, and events within its territorial boundaries.

• Subjective Territoriality: This refers to a state's jurisdiction over acts that begin within its territory, regardless of where they are completed. For example, if a crime is initiated in State A but completed in State B, State A can claim jurisdiction over the crime because it started within its borders.

• Objective Territoriality: This refers to a state's jurisdiction over acts that are completed within its territory, even if they were initiated outside the state's borders. For instance, if a fraudulent act is initiated in State A but affects a person or property in State B, State B can assert jurisdiction over the matter.

2. Nationality or Active Personality Principle

Under this principle, a state has jurisdiction over its nationals, regardless of where they are in the world. This principle extends a state's jurisdiction beyond its territorial limits based on the nationality of the individual involved.

• This applies to both natural persons (citizens) and juridical entities (corporations).

• For example, if a Filipino citizen commits a crime abroad, the Philippines can claim jurisdiction based on the active personality principle.

3. Passive Personality Principle

This principle allows a state to claim jurisdiction over offenses committed against its nationals, even when those offenses occur outside the state's territory.

• Although traditionally limited in scope, this principle has gained increased recognition in cases involving serious crimes such as terrorism, kidnapping, and human trafficking.

• For instance, if a Filipino is murdered in a foreign country, the Philippines may claim jurisdiction over the crime under the passive personality principle.

4. Protective Principle

This principle allows a state to assert jurisdiction over acts committed outside its territory if those acts threaten its national security, public safety, or vital interests.

• Crimes such as espionage, counterfeiting of state currency, and plotting to overthrow the government, even if conducted abroad, may fall under the protective jurisdiction of the state.

• The protective principle is used when the offense directly impacts the sovereignty, integrity, or vital interests of the state.

5. Universal Jurisdiction

This is an exceptional form of jurisdiction that permits a state to claim jurisdiction over certain serious crimes regardless of where they were committed, the nationality of the perpetrator, or the nationality of the victim.

• Universal jurisdiction is often invoked for crimes considered to be of universal concern, such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, piracy, torture, and slavery.

• The rationale behind universal jurisdiction is that these crimes are so egregious that all states have an interest in preventing and punishing them, regardless of where the crime occurred or who was involved.

• Examples include the prosecution of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet by Spanish courts, despite the crimes being committed in Chile.

6. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction

While the territorial jurisdiction principle is foundational, certain instances permit states to assert extraterritorial jurisdiction under international law:

• Effects Doctrine: A state may assert jurisdiction over actions conducted abroad if those actions have substantial effects within the state’s territory. This is a recognized aspect of both civil and criminal jurisdiction.

• Nationality-based Jurisdiction: As discussed earlier, states may exercise extraterritorial jurisdiction over their nationals, regardless of where the conduct occurs (i.e., active personality principle). This is especially relevant in areas like tax law, where nationals are subject to their home country’s tax system even if they reside abroad.

• Agreements and Treaties: Certain international treaties or agreements between states provide for the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction over certain offenses, such as international drug trafficking, money laundering, or cybercrimes.

---

Limitations on Jurisdiction

While a state’s right to exercise jurisdiction is broad, it is not absolute. The exercise of jurisdiction must be consistent with international law, which places certain limitations to avoid conflict between states:

• Sovereignty: A state cannot unilaterally impose its laws on the territory of another state without consent, as doing so would violate the principle of sovereignty.

• Non-intervention Principle: International law prohibits states from intervening in the domestic affairs of another state, which includes the unauthorized assertion of jurisdiction.

• Diplomatic Immunities: Diplomats, consular officials, and other foreign state representatives enjoy immunity from the jurisdiction of the host state, as provided for in treaties such as the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963).

• State Immunity: States, in certain circumstances, are immune from the jurisdiction of foreign courts, especially with regard to sovereign acts (acta jure imperii). However, this immunity is often limited in commercial transactions (acta jure gestionis).

---

Balancing Jurisdictional Conflicts

Jurisdictional conflicts arise when multiple states claim jurisdiction over the same individual or act. To resolve such conflicts, states typically rely on the principles of comity, diplomatic negotiation, and international cooperation through mechanisms such as extradition treaties and mutual legal assistance agreements.

• Comity: A state may choose not to exercise its jurisdiction in deference to another state that has a stronger connection to the matter, either because of the location of the crime, the nationality of the parties, or the impact on that state.

• Double Jeopardy (Ne bis in idem): Some states and international legal frameworks, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, prohibit the prosecution of a person for the same offense if they have already been adjudicated for it in another state.

---

Conclusion

The basis of jurisdiction of states in public international law is a multi-faceted and complex system that balances the rights of states to enforce their laws with the need to respect the sovereignty of other nations. The principles of territoriality, nationality, passive personality, protection, and universality provide the foundations for the exercise of jurisdiction, while limitations grounded in international law ensure that states do not overstep their boundaries, fostering peaceful international relations and cooperation.

Exemptions from Jurisdiction | Jurisdiction of States | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Public International Law: Exemptions from Jurisdiction

In public international law, the principle of state sovereignty generally allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over persons, property, and events within its territory. However, there are notable exemptions from this rule, based on the recognition of sovereign equality, the need for peaceful coexistence, and functional necessities in international relations. These exemptions primarily focus on two categories:

1. State Immunity
2. Diplomatic and Consular Immunities

1. State Immunity (Sovereign Immunity)

a. Concept

State immunity is a doctrine that prevents one state from being subject to the jurisdiction of another state’s courts. It derives from the principle that sovereign states are equal, and one sovereign state should not be subjected to the jurisdiction of another. This concept is encapsulated in the Latin phrase par in parem non habet imperium (equals have no authority over each other).

State immunity is typically divided into two main types:

• Absolute Immunity – Under this doctrine, a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state under any circumstance.
• Restrictive Immunity – This is the more commonly accepted modern approach. It allows for immunity in cases involving sovereign acts (jure imperii) but denies immunity for commercial or private acts (jure gestionis).

b. Acts Covered by State Immunity

• Sovereign Acts (Jure Imperii): These are acts performed by a state as part of its governmental or sovereign functions, such as:
  • Diplomatic acts
  • Military actions
  • Acts of state policy or legislation
  • Collection of taxes
• Commercial or Private Acts (Jure Gestionis): When a state engages in commercial activities that are typically undertaken by private individuals or corporations (e.g., entering into business contracts), it is generally not immune from jurisdiction.

c. Waiver of State Immunity

State immunity can be waived explicitly or implicitly by a state. This may occur through:

• Explicit Waiver: When a state enters into an agreement that includes a clause submitting to the jurisdiction of another state’s courts.
• Implicit Waiver: A state may also be deemed to have waived its immunity by engaging in litigation in the courts of another state or by participating in proceedings.

d. Exceptions to State Immunity

• Commercial Transactions: When a state engages in commercial activities, courts generally apply the restrictive theory of immunity and may assert jurisdiction.
• Expropriation of Property: If a state expropriates property in violation of international law, the injured party may seek redress in the courts of other states.
• Tort Claims: Some jurisdictions allow claims against foreign states for personal injuries or property damage caused by acts committed within the forum state's territory.
• Human Rights Violations: There is a growing trend towards denying immunity for serious violations of human rights, such as torture, genocide, and war crimes, though this is still evolving in international law.

2. Diplomatic and Consular Immunities

a. Diplomatic Immunity

Diplomatic immunity is rooted in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961, which codifies the customary international law principles governing the status of diplomats.

• Scope of Immunity:

  • Personal Immunity: Diplomats enjoy full immunity from criminal, civil, and administrative jurisdiction of the receiving state. This includes acts performed both in an official capacity and in their private life.
  • Inviolability of Diplomatic Premises and Communication: Diplomatic premises (embassies) are inviolable, and diplomatic correspondence is protected from interference by the host state.
  • Immunity from Testimony: Diplomats cannot be compelled to give testimony in the courts of the receiving state.

• Duration: Diplomatic immunity starts from the moment a diplomat enters the receiving state and continues throughout the duration of their mission, and even for a reasonable period afterward.

• Waiver of Diplomatic Immunity: Immunity may be waived by the sending state, but the waiver must be explicit. It is typically only waived in civil and not criminal cases.

• Limitations: While diplomats are immune from prosecution in the host state, they are still subject to the laws of their home state. Additionally, in cases of abuse of diplomatic privileges, the host state can declare the diplomat persona non grata and require their removal.

b. Consular Immunity

The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963 governs consular immunity, which is more limited in scope compared to diplomatic immunity.

• Scope of Immunity: Consular officials are immune from jurisdiction only in relation to acts performed in the exercise of their consular functions (official acts immunity). They do not enjoy personal immunity from criminal prosecution for private acts.

• Inviolability: Consular premises enjoy limited inviolability, meaning they can only be entered with the consent of the consular head. Consular archives and documents, however, are inviolable at all times.

• Exceptions: Unlike diplomats, consular officers may be subject to civil or administrative jurisdiction in the receiving state if the matter relates to private acts (e.g., a consular officer involved in a traffic accident outside the scope of their official duties may face legal proceedings).

3. Immunities for International Organizations and Their Officials

International organizations and their officials also enjoy certain immunities under international law to ensure that they can carry out their functions without undue interference from national courts.

a. Immunities of International Organizations

• Scope: International organizations, such as the United Nations and its specialized agencies, are generally immune from national jurisdiction under their founding treaties or headquarters agreements.
• Waiver: An organization may waive its immunity in specific cases, but this is typically rare.

b. Immunities of Officials of International Organizations

• Scope: Officials of international organizations enjoy immunity in relation to their official functions. This includes immunity from legal process in civil and criminal matters for acts performed in their official capacity.
• Diplomatic-Level Immunity: Senior officials, such as the Secretary-General of the United Nations or heads of specialized agencies, may enjoy diplomatic-level immunity similar to that of ambassadors.

4. Other Exemptions from Jurisdiction

a. Head of State Immunity

• Scope: The sitting head of state enjoys immunity from the jurisdiction of foreign courts for both official and private acts. This extends to immunity from criminal prosecution.
• Limitations: Once a head of state leaves office, they may still enjoy immunity for acts performed in their official capacity but may be subject to jurisdiction for private acts. Additionally, international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity may negate this immunity under certain circumstances.

b. Military Forces Immunity (Status of Forces Agreements – SOFA)

• Scope: Under Status of Forces Agreements (SOFAs), military personnel stationed in foreign countries enjoy certain immunities. Typically, military personnel are subject to the jurisdiction of their sending state rather than the host state, particularly for acts performed in the line of duty.
• Exceptions: Immunity may not extend to acts outside the official functions of the military personnel (e.g., private crimes committed while off-duty).

---

In summary, the principle of state sovereignty in international law is tempered by various exemptions from jurisdiction, rooted in respect for the sovereign equality of states, diplomatic norms, and the practical necessities of international relations. While the traditional approach granted extensive immunities, modern practice increasingly narrows these immunities, especially in cases involving commercial activities, human rights violations, and other exceptional circumstances.

Treatment of Aliens | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Treatment of Aliens under Public International Law

The treatment of aliens under Public International Law is governed by principles aimed at balancing the sovereignty of states with the need to ensure fair and equitable treatment for foreign nationals (aliens). These principles regulate the entry, stay, and rights of aliens within a state's territory while ensuring that states retain the right to control their borders and the conduct of non-citizens within their jurisdiction. Below is a meticulous outline of the key legal doctrines, customary international law principles, and relevant treaties and jurisprudence governing the treatment of aliens.

1. Sovereignty and Control Over Aliens

States possess the inherent right to control their borders and regulate the entry and stay of foreigners. This right includes:

• Admission: States are generally free to determine who may enter their territory, subject to international obligations (e.g., non-refoulement under refugee law).
• Expulsion: States may deport or expel aliens but must adhere to international legal standards.
• Jurisdiction: Aliens are subject to the territorial and personal jurisdiction of the host state.

2. Standard of Treatment

The treatment of aliens is governed by two key standards under international law:

1. National Treatment Standard: Aliens must be treated at least as favorably as nationals in similar circumstances.
2. International Minimum Standard (IMS): Regardless of how a state treats its own citizens, it must treat aliens in accordance with a minimum standard of fairness, decency, and justice recognized by international law.

a. National Treatment Standard

• This principle obligates states to ensure that aliens are not treated less favorably than their own citizens in certain areas, including property rights, access to justice, and commercial activity.
• However, national treatment is not absolute, and states may distinguish between citizens and aliens in areas such as political rights (e.g., voting and holding office) or military service.

b. International Minimum Standard (IMS)

• Customary Law: The IMS is a customary rule that requires states to provide basic protections for aliens, regardless of their domestic laws or policies.
• Core Elements of IMS:
  • Denial of Justice: The IMS prohibits the denial of access to courts or the administration of justice in a manner that violates fundamental principles of due process.
  • Arbitrary Detention: Aliens must not be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned without due process.
  • Protection from Abuse: States must protect aliens from harm, including physical violence, discriminatory treatment, and torture.

3. Protection of Aliens’ Rights

International law recognizes that aliens possess certain fundamental rights which must be respected by the host state. These rights include:

a. Right to Life, Liberty, and Security

• Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR): Aliens, like all individuals, are entitled to life, liberty, and security of person.
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): This treaty ensures that aliens have the right to life and freedom from arbitrary detention, among other rights.

b. Right to Due Process

• Aliens are entitled to due process under both national and international law. This includes the right to be informed of charges, the right to a fair trial, and protection from arbitrary arrest or deportation.
• Non-Refoulement Principle: Under international refugee law (as codified in the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol), a state is prohibited from returning an alien to a country where they may face persecution based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

c. Right to Property

• International law protects the right of aliens to own property in the host state, subject to local laws. States must not expropriate an alien's property without providing prompt, adequate, and effective compensation (as per the customary rule on expropriation and international investment agreements).
• Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs): Many BITs contain provisions that protect foreign investors and their property from arbitrary seizure by the host state.

d. Right to Compensation for Expropriation

• States may expropriate the property of aliens for public purposes, but this must be done in accordance with international law. The key principles are:
  • Public Purpose: Expropriation must be for a legitimate public interest.
  • Non-discrimination: The expropriation must not target aliens on the basis of their nationality.
  • Adequate Compensation: States are obligated to provide full, prompt, and effective compensation, often referred to as the "Hull formula."

4. Customary International Law Protections

The customary international law principles governing the treatment of aliens include:

• Protection of Aliens Abroad: States are responsible for ensuring that their citizens (aliens in another state) are treated fairly, and may invoke diplomatic protection if their rights are violated.
• Diplomatic Protection: A state may intervene on behalf of its nationals when they suffer an injury that constitutes a breach of international law by another state. However, certain conditions apply, such as the exhaustion of local remedies by the alien.
• Right to Access to Justice: Aliens have the right to fair and accessible legal processes, including access to courts and protection against bias or discriminatory judicial procedures.

5. Expulsion and Deportation of Aliens

While states have the sovereign right to expel aliens, certain international obligations limit this power. Expulsion must be carried out in accordance with due process and the protection of basic human rights:

• Non-Arbitrary Expulsion: States must ensure that expulsion is not carried out arbitrarily or in bad faith.
• Right to Appeal: Aliens often have the right to challenge their expulsion through administrative or judicial review.
• Collective Expulsion Prohibition: The practice of collectively expelling a group of aliens without consideration of their individual cases is prohibited under international law (e.g., Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the European Convention on Human Rights).

6. International Treaties Protecting Aliens

Several international treaties directly address the treatment of aliens and their rights within foreign states, including:

a. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

• The UDHR enshrines basic rights and freedoms for all individuals, including aliens, such as the right to life, liberty, security, and protection from discrimination.

b. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

• This treaty protects aliens' rights to due process, freedom from arbitrary arrest, and fair treatment under the law.

c. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951 Refugee Convention)

• The Refugee Convention establishes the principle of non-refoulement and provides protections for individuals who are recognized as refugees, including the right to seek asylum and protection from return to their home country where they may face persecution.

d. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (ICMW)

• This treaty provides comprehensive protection to migrant workers and their families, ensuring their fair treatment and protection of their rights.

e. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963)

• Under this treaty, when an alien is arrested or detained, they have the right to consular notification. The home country’s consulate must be informed and allowed to provide assistance to the national.

7. Case Law and Jurisprudence

Significant international case law has further clarified the obligations of states concerning the treatment of aliens:

• Neer Claim (1926): This early decision by the U.S.-Mexico Claims Commission established the standard that states violate international law when they fail to treat aliens in accordance with the international minimum standard of “outrage, bad faith, willful neglect of duty, or an insufficiency of governmental action.”
• Barcelona Traction Case (1970): The International Court of Justice emphasized the distinction between the rights of a company and the rights of shareholders (who may be aliens) when it comes to diplomatic protection.

8. Philippine Context

In the Philippines, the treatment of aliens is generally governed by domestic laws in conjunction with international obligations. The Constitution of the Philippines provides for the equal protection of the laws to all persons, including aliens, under the Bill of Rights. However, certain rights and privileges, such as land ownership and political rights, are reserved for Filipino citizens.

• Immigration Act of 1940: Governs the admission, stay, and expulsion of aliens in the Philippines.
• Philippine Refugee and Stateless Persons Protection Act: Implements the country’s obligations under the Refugee Convention, particularly the principle of non-refoulement.

Conclusion

The treatment of aliens under Public International Law seeks to strike a balance between the sovereign rights of states and the protection of fundamental rights of foreign nationals. The key obligations imposed on states include ensuring non-arbitrary treatment, access to justice, protection from expropriation without compensation, and adherence to international minimum standards. Additionally, customary international law, treaties, and jurisprudence all play critical roles in shaping the treatment of aliens across different legal systems, including in the Philippines.

Extradition | Treatment of Aliens | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Extradition: A Detailed Analysis under Philippine Law and Public International Law

I. Definition of Extradition

Extradition is a process where one sovereign state surrenders an individual to another sovereign state for the purpose of prosecution or punishment for crimes committed within the jurisdiction of the requesting state. It is a means of international cooperation to combat transnational crimes and prevent fugitives from evading justice by fleeing to other countries.

Extradition is not an inherent right under international law. It is generally governed by treaties, conventions, and domestic law. In the absence of a treaty, states may also extradite individuals based on principles of reciprocity or comity.

---

II. Legal Framework Governing Extradition in the Philippines

1. Constitutional Basis

   The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines provides a broad legal framework for international cooperation. Although it does not specifically mention extradition, it upholds the country’s obligations under international law, as provided under Article II, Section 2, which states:

   "The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy, adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land, and adheres to the policy of peace, equality, justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations."

2. The Philippine Extradition Law (Presidential Decree No. 1069)

   The main piece of legislation governing extradition in the Philippines is Presidential Decree No. 1069, or the "Philippine Extradition Law," promulgated in 1977. It provides a detailed procedure for the extradition of individuals between the Philippines and other states, based on an extradition treaty.

   Key provisions of PD No. 1069 include:

   • Sec. 2: Defines the purpose of the law, which is to "prescribe the procedure for the extradition of persons who have committed crimes in a foreign country."
   • Sec. 3: Limits extradition only to cases where a treaty exists between the Philippines and the requesting state, except when reciprocity can be invoked.
   • Sec. 6: Details the formal requirements for an extradition request, which must include official documents such as warrants of arrest, indictments, or statements of the offense.
   • Sec. 9: Provides for a summary extradition procedure, limiting judicial review primarily to the sufficiency of the documents submitted and the legality of the arrest.

3. Extradition Treaties

   The Philippines has bilateral extradition treaties with several countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Spain, among others. These treaties establish the legal basis for the surrender of fugitives between the signatory states.

4. International Agreements

   In addition to bilateral treaties, the Philippines is also a signatory to multilateral agreements that provide frameworks for extradition or mutual legal assistance, such as:

   • The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC)
   • The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)
   • Various regional conventions within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

---

III. Substantive and Procedural Requirements for Extradition

1. Principle of Double Criminality

   A fundamental requirement for extradition is the principle of double criminality. This means that the act for which extradition is sought must be a crime in both the requesting and requested states. The offense must be punishable under the laws of both states, usually by a significant penalty (often imprisonment for a year or more).

2. Extraditable Offenses

   Not all crimes are extraditable. Treaties often contain a list of extraditable offenses. Extraditable crimes typically include:

   • Serious offenses such as murder, rape, drug trafficking, and terrorism.
   • Economic crimes like fraud, embezzlement, and money laundering.
   • In recent years, certain cybercrimes have also been included in extradition treaties.

3. Non-Extraditable Offenses

   Certain offenses are generally not subject to extradition, including:

   • Political Offenses: Extradition is typically not allowed for purely political crimes, such as sedition, rebellion, or treason. The rationale is that states should not intervene in another country’s internal political disputes.
   • Military Offenses: Offenses under military law that do not constitute crimes under ordinary criminal law are also typically excluded.
   • Religious Offenses: Acts solely based on religious beliefs or practices are generally non-extraditable.

4. The Rule of Specialty

   The Rule of Specialty is an important safeguard for individuals being extradited. It mandates that the individual may only be tried or punished for the offense for which extradition was granted. If the requesting state seeks to prosecute the person for a different crime, it must seek the permission of the extraditing state.

5. Extradition Procedure under PD No. 1069

   The procedure for extradition in the Philippines is primarily executive in nature, with limited judicial involvement. The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) play pivotal roles.

   a. Filing of the Request: The request for extradition is made by the diplomatic or consular representative of the requesting state, through the DFA, to the DOJ.

   b. Evaluation by the DOJ: The DOJ reviews the documents submitted to determine if they comply with the requirements of the extradition treaty or PD No. 1069. If the request is in order, the DOJ files a petition for extradition with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of the place where the person is found.

   c. Judicial Hearing: The RTC conducts a summary extradition hearing, where the court determines the sufficiency of the evidence submitted by the requesting state. The court does not adjudicate on the guilt or innocence of the person sought, only on whether the documents justify extradition.

   d. Issuance of a Warrant of Arrest: If the court finds that the evidence is sufficient, it may issue a warrant of arrest and order the person’s detention pending the final decision on extradition.

   e. Appeals: Decisions of the RTC in extradition cases are appealable to higher courts, although the scope of review is limited to legal issues rather than factual determinations.

---

IV. Grounds for Refusal of Extradition

1. Political Offenses Exception

   The political offense exception is a key ground for denying extradition. If the requested state determines that the offense for which extradition is sought is political in nature, it can refuse to extradite the individual.

   In Philippine jurisprudence, cases like Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region v. Olalia (G.R. No. 153675, April 19, 2007) have examined the application of the political offense exception.

2. Risk of Torture, Inhumane Treatment, or Death Penalty

   The Philippines, as a signatory to various human rights treaties, may refuse extradition if there is a substantial risk that the individual would face torture, inhumane treatment, or the death penalty in the requesting state.

   • Death Penalty: The Philippines abolished the death penalty in 2006, so extradition to a country where the death penalty is a potential punishment may be denied unless there are assurances that it will not be imposed.

3. Human Rights Violations

   A significant concern for the Philippine government is the protection of the individual’s human rights. If the person’s extradition would result in a violation of their basic human rights, extradition may be denied.

---

V. Recent Jurisprudence and Trends in Philippine Extradition

1. Case Law

   • Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region v. Hon. Olalia Jr., et al. (G.R. No. 153675, April 19, 2007): The Supreme Court ruled that in extradition proceedings, the requested state cannot inquire into the political motivations behind the requesting state’s request, except where the political offense exception is invoked.
   • Secretary of Justice v. Lantion (G.R. No. 139465, January 18, 2000): This case highlights the importance of procedural due process in extradition, ruling that the prospective extraditee has a right to notice and to be heard during the evaluation of the extradition request.

2. Extradition and Terrorism

   With the rise of global terrorism, extradition has increasingly been used as a tool to combat international terrorism. The Philippines has been active in this regard, particularly through cooperation with countries in the region via ASEAN treaties and international conventions.

---

VI. Conclusion

Extradition remains a critical legal process in both Philippine law and international law. The balance between respecting sovereignty, ensuring justice, and protecting individual rights is a constant challenge in extradition cases. In the Philippines, extradition is governed by a combination of treaties, domestic laws, and jurisprudence, all aimed at ensuring that the process is fair and just, while also fulfilling the country’s international obligations.

International Human Rights Law | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
XVI. International Human Rights Law

International Human Rights Law (IHRL) consists of a body of international treaties, customary international law, and other instruments designed to protect and promote human rights at the international level. It aims to hold states and non-state actors accountable for respecting and ensuring the human rights of individuals.

This framework is essential in public international law as it sets standards and norms for human dignity and equality, guiding both state behavior and national legal systems in promoting these values.

A. Historical Background

1. Origins

   • The concept of human rights as international obligations emerged post-World War II, following atrocities such as the Holocaust and other war crimes.
   • The creation of the United Nations (UN) in 1945 marked a turning point, embedding human rights in the global agenda.
   • In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the UN General Assembly, laying down fundamental human rights principles.

2. Treaty Development

   • International human rights obligations became formalized through treaties such as:
     • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966)
     • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (1966)

3. Customary International Law

   • Certain human rights have evolved into customary international law, binding even non-signatory states to basic norms, such as prohibitions on genocide, torture, slavery, and racial discrimination.

B. Sources of International Human Rights Law

1. Treaties
   Treaties are the principal sources of IHRL, requiring state parties to adhere to the obligations they undertake. Some of the most significant treaties include:

   • UDHR: Although non-binding, the UDHR is a cornerstone document, guiding human rights standards globally.
   • ICCPR: Focuses on civil and political rights such as the right to life, freedom of expression, and a fair trial.
   • ICESCR: Protects economic, social, and cultural rights like the right to education, health, and work.
   • Convention Against Torture (CAT): Prohibits torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.
   • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): Focuses on women's rights and gender equality.
   • Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC): Protects the rights of children.
   • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD): Prohibits racial discrimination.

2. Customary International Law
   Customary international law arises from general and consistent state practice accepted as law. Key customary norms in human rights include:

   • Prohibition of genocide
   • Prohibition of torture
   • Slavery and the slave trade
   • Racial discrimination

3. General Principles of Law
   General principles recognized by civilized nations also contribute to IHRL, such as fairness, due process, and justice.

4. Subsidiary Sources
   Judicial decisions (e.g., International Court of Justice (ICJ), European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)) and writings of scholars provide interpretation and clarification of human rights norms.

C. Key Principles and Norms in International Human Rights Law

1. Universality

   • Human rights are universal, meaning they apply to all people, regardless of nationality, race, sex, religion, or any other status.
   • This principle is enshrined in the UDHR and reaffirmed by numerous treaties.

2. Indivisibility and Interdependence

   • Civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights are indivisible and interdependent. The violation of one right affects the enjoyment of others.

3. Non-Discrimination

   • A core tenet of IHRL is that all rights are guaranteed without discrimination. This principle is embedded in major instruments like the ICCPR, ICESCR, and ICERD.

4. Equality before the Law

   • Equal protection of the law is fundamental, ensuring no individual or group is above the law or excluded from its protection.

5. State Obligations

   • States have the primary responsibility to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights.
     • Respect: Refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights.
     • Protect: Protect individuals and groups from human rights abuses.
     • Fulfill: Take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.

6. Derogation and Limitation

   • While human rights are universal, certain rights can be limited or derogated under specific circumstances, such as in times of emergency. However, some rights, like the right to life and freedom from torture, are non-derogable.

D. International Enforcement Mechanisms

1. United Nations System
   The UN plays a critical role in monitoring and enforcing international human rights norms. Its system includes:

   • UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC): An intergovernmental body responsible for strengthening human rights and addressing violations.
   • Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR): Leads UN efforts to promote and protect human rights globally.
   • Treaty Monitoring Bodies: Independent expert bodies monitor the implementation of core human rights treaties. Examples include the Human Rights Committee (ICCPR) and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ICERD).

2. Regional Human Rights Systems
   Regional human rights systems operate in Africa, Europe, and the Americas to enforce human rights within specific geographical areas. Notable systems include:

   • European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): Oversees the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights.
   • Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR): Monitors compliance with the American Convention on Human Rights.
   • African Commission and Court on Human and Peoples' Rights: Enforces the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

3. International Criminal Law and Human Rights
   Violations of human rights that constitute serious crimes (e.g., genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes) fall under international criminal law, particularly under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

4. Domestic Implementation
   States are obligated to domesticate international human rights treaties and norms into their legal systems. National courts often apply international human rights law, either directly or through enabling legislation.

E. Philippines and International Human Rights Law

1. Treaty Ratification

   • The Philippines has ratified several key international human rights treaties, including:
     • ICCPR
     • ICESCR
     • CEDAW
     • CAT
     • CRC

2. Domestic Legal Framework

   • 1987 Philippine Constitution: Provides for the incorporation of generally accepted principles of international law into the law of the land (Article II, Section 2).
   • Domestic laws such as the Anti-Torture Act of 2009 (RA 9745) and the Magna Carta of Women (RA 9710) implement treaty obligations.
   • The Philippine Commission on Human Rights (CHR) is mandated to investigate human rights violations and ensure compliance with human rights standards.

3. Challenges and Criticisms

   • Despite ratification, the Philippines faces significant challenges in human rights protection, including issues related to extrajudicial killings, freedom of the press, and the rights of indigenous peoples.
   • The country has been under scrutiny for its human rights record, particularly in relation to the "war on drugs" and alleged human rights abuses by security forces.

F. Emerging Trends and Contemporary Issues

1. Digital Rights

   • The expansion of the digital space raises new challenges, such as privacy concerns, internet access, and the regulation of online hate speech and disinformation.

2. Climate Justice and Human Rights

   • The impact of climate change on human rights is a growing issue, especially in vulnerable states like the Philippines, which face severe climate-related risks.

3. Rights of Refugees and Migrants

   • With increasing global displacement, the rights of refugees and migrants are at the forefront of international human rights concerns. The Philippines, as a sending state for migrant workers, is actively engaged in this issue.

Conclusion

International Human Rights Law is a comprehensive system that seeks to protect individuals from abuses by states and non-state actors. It operates through a complex network of treaties, customary international law, and international and regional institutions. The Philippines, as part of the international community, is bound by its treaty obligations and international legal standards, though it faces ongoing challenges in fully realizing these rights domestically.

International Humanitarian Law | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) - Overview

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), often referred to as the law of war or law of armed conflict, is a branch of public international law aimed at regulating conduct during armed conflicts to protect individuals who are not, or are no longer, participating in hostilities, and to limit the means and methods of warfare.

Sources of International Humanitarian Law

IHL is primarily based on the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols (1977), alongside customary international law and various other treaties and conventions. Some key instruments include:

1. The Four Geneva Conventions of 1949:

   • First Geneva Convention: Protection of wounded and sick soldiers on land.
   • Second Geneva Convention: Protection of wounded, sick, and shipwrecked soldiers at sea.
   • Third Geneva Convention: Treatment of prisoners of war (POWs).
   • Fourth Geneva Convention: Protection of civilians in times of war.

2. Additional Protocols I and II (1977):

   • Protocol I: Applies to international armed conflicts.
   • Protocol II: Applies to non-international armed conflicts.

3. Customary International Humanitarian Law: Many rules of IHL, particularly those not codified in treaties, have become customary international law, binding on all states, regardless of their participation in specific treaties.

4. Other Treaties and Conventions:

   • The Hague Conventions (1899 and 1907) focus on the methods and means of warfare.
   • Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (1980) and its Protocols limit the use of certain types of weapons (e.g., landmines, incendiary weapons).
   • Ottawa Treaty (1997) prohibits anti-personnel mines.
   • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) (1998) incorporates war crimes provisions under IHL.

Core Principles of International Humanitarian Law

IHL is based on key principles that aim to balance military necessity with humanitarian considerations. These include:

1. Distinction:

   • Parties to a conflict must always distinguish between combatants and civilians, and between military objectives and civilian objects. Attacks must only be directed at military targets.

2. Proportionality:

   • The harm caused to civilians and civilian property must not be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage gained from an attack.

3. Precaution:

   • Parties must take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians during military operations.

4. Humanity:

   • Unnecessary suffering and superfluous injury to combatants and civilians must be avoided. This principle limits the use of weapons and tactics that cause excessive harm.

5. Non-discrimination:

   • IHL applies equally to all persons affected by armed conflict, without adverse distinction based on nationality, race, religion, or other criteria.

6. Necessity:

   • Military actions must be necessary for achieving a legitimate military objective and must not go beyond what is required.

Categories of Armed Conflict under IHL

1. International Armed Conflicts (IACs):

   • Conflicts between two or more states. The full set of Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I apply in such conflicts.

2. Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIACs):

   • Conflicts between government forces and non-state armed groups or between such groups within a state. Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II apply in such conflicts. NIACs do not involve conflicts of a purely internal nature (e.g., riots or isolated acts of violence).

Protection of Persons under IHL

1. Civilians:

   • Civilians are protected against attack unless they take a direct part in hostilities. In IACs, civilians enjoy broader protections under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

2. Combatants:

   • Combatants are lawful participants in hostilities and may be attacked, but they must be treated humanely if they are wounded or captured. In IACs, captured combatants are entitled to POW status under the Third Geneva Convention.

3. Prisoners of War (POWs):

   • POWs are protected under the Third Geneva Convention. They must be treated humanely, protected from violence, intimidation, and public curiosity, and provided with adequate food, shelter, and medical care.

4. Wounded and Sick:

   • The First and Second Geneva Conventions provide protection for the wounded and sick in armed forces, both on land and at sea. They must be treated humanely and without adverse distinction.

5. Medical and Religious Personnel:

   • Medical personnel, units, and transports must be respected and protected. They should not be attacked, and they must be allowed to perform their duties. Religious personnel attached to armed forces are also protected.

6. Humanitarian Relief Workers:

   • Humanitarian workers, especially those associated with neutral organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), must be allowed access to provide aid to those in need, subject to security requirements.

Means and Methods of Warfare

IHL places significant restrictions on the means and methods of warfare to limit unnecessary suffering and destruction. These restrictions include:

1. Prohibited Weapons:

   • IHL prohibits the use of certain weapons that cause unnecessary suffering or have indiscriminate effects. These include:
     • Biological and chemical weapons (under the Biological Weapons Convention and Chemical Weapons Convention).
     • Anti-personnel landmines (under the Ottawa Treaty).
     • Blinding laser weapons (under the Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons).

2. Protection of the Natural Environment:

   • Under IHL, the environment is protected against widespread, long-term, and severe damage. Methods and means of warfare that cause such damage are prohibited.

3. Prohibition of Starvation as a Method of Warfare:

   • Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited. IHL requires that humanitarian aid be allowed to reach civilian populations in need, even in conflict zones.

4. Sieges and Blockades:

   • Sieges and blockades are permissible under IHL, but the rules of distinction and proportionality apply. Civilians must be allowed to leave besieged areas, and relief operations must be permitted.

Enforcement and Accountability

The enforcement of IHL is a major concern, and various mechanisms have been established to ensure accountability for violations. These include:

1. Grave Breaches:

   • IHL identifies certain acts as “grave breaches,” which are serious violations of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I. Grave breaches include willful killing, torture, and taking hostages. States are required to investigate and prosecute individuals responsible for grave breaches.

2. War Crimes:

   • War crimes include grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and other serious violations of IHL, such as targeting civilians, using prohibited weapons, and committing sexual violence. War crimes can be prosecuted domestically or at the international level, including by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

3. International Criminal Court (ICC):

   • The ICC, established under the Rome Statute, has jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. The ICC is a court of last resort, acting only when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute offenders.

4. Universal Jurisdiction:

   • Under the principle of universal jurisdiction, states have the obligation or right to prosecute individuals for serious violations of IHL, regardless of where the crime was committed or the nationality of the perpetrator or victim.

5. National Courts:

   • States are required under IHL to enact national laws that implement their obligations under IHL, including provisions for the prosecution of war crimes. Many countries have incorporated IHL into their domestic legal systems to enable the prosecution of war criminals.

IHL in the Philippine Context

The Philippines, as a party to the Geneva Conventions and its Additional Protocols, is bound by the provisions of IHL. The Philippines also has relevant domestic laws that implement IHL, such as:

1. Republic Act No. 9851 (Philippine Act on Crimes Against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes Against Humanity):

   • This law provides for the prosecution of individuals responsible for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity under the principle of complementarity with the ICC. It incorporates into Philippine law key provisions of the Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols, and the Rome Statute of the ICC.

2. Executive Order No. 134 (National IHL Committee):

   • This executive order established the National Committee on International Humanitarian Law, which ensures the Philippines' compliance with IHL and coordinates IHL-related activities with international and domestic organizations.

3. Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Code of Conduct:

   • The AFP adheres to the principles of IHL through its Code of Conduct and various operational guidelines that emphasize the protection of civilians, humanitarian law, and human rights.

---

In conclusion, International Humanitarian Law plays a crucial role in regulating armed conflict, protecting non-combatants, and limiting the methods and means of warfare. Its enforcement through both international mechanisms like the ICC and domestic laws like the Philippines’ RA 9851 ensures accountability for violations. While its challenges persist, IHL remains an essential framework for promoting humanity even in times of war.

Categories of Armed Conflicts | International Humanitarian Law | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Categories of Armed Conflicts in International Humanitarian Law (IHL)

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), also referred to as the law of armed conflict, governs the conduct of hostilities and the protection of persons during times of armed conflict. One of its key functions is to classify armed conflicts because the rights and responsibilities of parties, as well as the protections afforded to combatants and civilians, can vary depending on the type of conflict. The two principal categories of armed conflicts under IHL are International Armed Conflicts (IACs) and Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIACs).

1. International Armed Conflicts (IACs)

International armed conflicts are governed primarily by the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocol I (1977). These apply in any conflict between two or more states, regardless of whether a formal declaration of war has been made.

• Definition: An IAC exists whenever there is a resort to armed force between two or more sovereign states. This is the most straightforward type of armed conflict, and it is presumed to exist whenever there is military engagement between states.

• Scope of Application:

  • The Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I provide comprehensive rules for the protection of wounded and sick soldiers, prisoners of war, and civilians.
  • IACs also include wars of national liberation in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation, or racist regimes in the exercise of their right to self-determination. These conflicts, while not traditional state-versus-state wars, are recognized as IACs under Article 1(4) of Additional Protocol I.

• Key Principles and Rules:

  • Distinction: Parties must always distinguish between combatants and civilians.
  • Proportionality: Attacks must not cause excessive civilian harm in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  • Necessity: Force must only be used to achieve legitimate military objectives.
  • Humanity: Suffering must not be excessive, and unnecessary cruelty is forbidden.

• Combatant Status and Prisoners of War (POWs): Combatants in IACs are afforded combatant immunity for lawful acts of war and are entitled to prisoner-of-war status if captured. POWs are protected under the Third Geneva Convention, which mandates humane treatment and specific conditions for their internment.

• Occupied Territories: The law of occupation, governed by the Fourth Geneva Convention and Additional Protocol I, applies when a territory is placed under the control of a hostile foreign state. It sets out protections for the civilian population in occupied territories and establishes the duties of the occupying power.

2. Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIACs)

Non-international armed conflicts are typically governed by Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II (1977). These types of conflicts occur within the territory of a single state and involve either state forces and non-state armed groups or conflicts between non-state armed groups.

• Definition: NIACs occur when there is protracted armed violence between government forces and organized armed groups, or between such groups within a state. The threshold for NIACs is higher than mere internal disturbances or tensions (e.g., riots or isolated acts of violence). There must be a minimum degree of organization on the part of the armed groups and sustained intensity of fighting.

• Scope of Application: The rules for NIACs are more limited compared to those governing IACs. However, Common Article 3, often referred to as a "mini-convention," provides basic guarantees, such as:

  • Humane treatment of persons not taking active part in hostilities, including fighters who have laid down their arms.
  • Prohibition of murder, torture, cruel treatment, and outrages upon personal dignity.
  • Prohibition of the taking of hostages.
  • Fair trial guarantees for those detained.

• Additional Protocol II: This protocol further elaborates on the protection of persons in NIACs, but its applicability is limited to conflicts that meet certain higher thresholds, including the control of territory by non-state actors that allows them to carry out sustained military operations.

• Internal Disturbances and Tensions: Situations of internal disturbances, such as riots or isolated and sporadic acts of violence, do not qualify as NIACs. These situations are typically governed by domestic law and human rights law, rather than IHL.

3. Other Situations

While the two principal categories of armed conflict under IHL are IACs and NIACs, there are some additional nuances and emerging types of conflicts that are relevant under modern IHL interpretations:

• Mixed Conflicts or "Transnational" Conflicts: Some conflicts involve cross-border elements but do not fit neatly into the traditional IAC/NIAC distinction. For example, conflicts between a state and non-state armed groups that operate across national borders, such as certain terrorism-related conflicts, raise complex classification questions. These conflicts may require a combination of NIAC and IAC rules depending on the context.

• Internationalized Internal Conflicts: An internal conflict (NIAC) may become "internationalized" when one or more foreign states intervene on behalf of either the government or the non-state armed group. When this occurs, parts of the conflict may be governed by the laws of IACs if state forces are directly involved in hostilities against another state's forces.

• Armed Conflicts Involving Terrorist Groups: The rise of terrorist organizations as key players in modern armed conflicts, such as ISIS, has raised questions about the classification of these conflicts. In general, if a terrorist group has sufficient organization and conducts sustained military operations, the conflict may be classified as a NIAC. However, counterterrorism operations conducted by states in foreign territories could trigger the rules of IACs if the territorial state's government is involved.

4. Principles and Protections Common to All Armed Conflicts

Regardless of whether a conflict is classified as an IAC or NIAC, several core principles under IHL apply across the board:

• Protection of Civilians: Civilians must be protected from the effects of hostilities, and all feasible precautions must be taken to avoid harming them.

• Prohibition of Targeting Non-Combatants: Combatants must not direct attacks against civilians, civilian objects, or those who are hors de combat (e.g., wounded soldiers or prisoners of war).

• Prohibition of Torture and Other Cruel Treatment: Both in IACs and NIACs, torture and inhuman treatment are absolutely prohibited, without exception, under Common Article 3 and Customary International Law.

• Treatment of the Wounded and Sick: Combatants who are wounded or sick, regardless of their affiliation, must be cared for, and medical personnel and facilities must be protected from attack.

• Prohibition on the Use of Indiscriminate Weapons: Weapons that cannot distinguish between combatants and civilians, or that cause unnecessary suffering, are prohibited in all armed conflicts.

5. Challenges in Modern Armed Conflict Classifications

In contemporary conflicts, the classification of armed conflicts has become more challenging due to:

• Hybrid Warfare: States and non-state actors may employ a combination of conventional and unconventional tactics, cyber warfare, propaganda, and irregular combat forces, making it difficult to draw clear distinctions.

• Use of Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs): The involvement of private contractors in hostilities can complicate the classification of a conflict, as they may not fall neatly into the traditional categories of state or non-state actors.

• Cyber Warfare: IHL is still adapting to new domains of conflict, such as cyber warfare, which could occur without direct physical violence but still cause significant harm to states or civilians.

6. Conclusion

In summary, the classification of armed conflicts under International Humanitarian Law is essential for determining the applicable legal regime and the protections afforded to individuals. The key distinction is between International Armed Conflicts (IACs), which involve conflicts between states, and Non-International Armed Conflicts (NIACs), which involve armed violence between a state and non-state actors or among non-state actors. Despite the complexity of modern warfare, the core principles of IHL—such as the protection of civilians and the humane treatment of all persons—remain at the heart of the law, guiding the conduct of hostilities and safeguarding human dignity in the midst of armed conflict.

Judicial and Arbitral Settlement | PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Judicial and Arbitral Settlement in Public International Law

Introduction Judicial and arbitral settlement are formal methods for resolving disputes between states under Public International Law. These methods provide impartial, legal means for peaceful dispute resolution, rather than resorting to force or coercion. This section will cover the principles, legal framework, key institutions, and procedures surrounding judicial and arbitral settlement in Public International Law.

1. Judicial Settlement

Judicial settlement refers to the resolution of disputes between states through the adjudication by an international court or tribunal. The most prominent institution for judicial settlement in Public International Law is the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

A. International Court of Justice (ICJ)

The ICJ, established by the United Nations Charter in 1945, serves as the principal judicial organ of the UN. It settles legal disputes submitted to it by states and gives advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by authorized international organs and agencies.

i. Jurisdiction of the ICJ

The ICJ has two types of jurisdiction:

• Contentious Jurisdiction: The ICJ can only hear disputes between states that have consented to its jurisdiction. Consent may be given in the following ways:

  • Through special agreement (compromis) where both parties agree to submit the dispute to the ICJ.
  • Via compromissory clauses in treaties that provide for the ICJ to have jurisdiction over disputes related to that treaty.
  • Through optional clause declarations under Article 36(2) of the ICJ Statute, where states may declare they recognize the ICJ’s jurisdiction as compulsory in legal disputes with other states that have made the same declaration.
  • Forum prorogatum, where a state consents to the ICJ’s jurisdiction after proceedings have been initiated by another state.

• Advisory Jurisdiction: The ICJ provides advisory opinions on legal questions when requested by the UN General Assembly, the UN Security Council, or other UN bodies and specialized agencies. Advisory opinions are non-binding but carry significant legal and moral authority.

ii. Procedure Before the ICJ

The ICJ's procedure is governed by its Statute and Rules of Procedure:

• Written Phase: States submit memorials (written pleadings), detailing their legal arguments and evidence.
• Oral Phase: States present oral arguments before the court, which may include legal representatives, experts, and witnesses.
• Judgment: The ICJ’s decision is binding only on the parties to the dispute and is final, without appeal. States may request interpretation or revision of the judgment in certain circumstances.

iii. Enforcement of ICJ Judgments

ICJ judgments are binding, but enforcement is primarily political, relying on state compliance. The UN Security Council may intervene under Article 94 of the UN Charter to enforce an ICJ judgment if requested by one of the parties, but this requires the Council’s discretionary action and is subject to veto by its permanent members.

B. Other Judicial Tribunals

In addition to the ICJ, other judicial bodies contribute to the settlement of international disputes, such as:

• International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): Established under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to adjudicate disputes related to maritime law.
• World Trade Organization (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body: Handles disputes between WTO members regarding trade agreements.
• Regional Courts: Regional organizations like the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights resolve human rights disputes in their respective regions.
• International Criminal Court (ICC): Although primarily focused on criminal accountability, the ICC deals with state parties in cases involving international crimes (genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression).

2. Arbitral Settlement

Arbitration in Public International Law is a process where disputing parties agree to submit their dispute to a panel of arbitrators whose decision is binding. Arbitration allows for greater flexibility and control over the selection of arbitrators and procedural rules compared to judicial settlement.

A. Key Characteristics of Arbitration

• Voluntary Nature: States must agree to arbitration through a compromis or an agreement to arbitrate, which may be found in treaties or ad hoc arrangements.
• Binding Decision: The arbitral tribunal’s decision is binding on the parties.
• Selection of Arbitrators: Parties generally have the freedom to appoint arbitrators, often experts in the field of dispute.
• Flexibility in Procedure: Arbitration allows parties to define procedural rules, unlike courts where the procedure is set by statute or international conventions.

B. Major Arbitration Bodies

Several key institutions provide arbitral services in international law:

• Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA): Established by the Hague Convention of 1899, the PCA provides services for the arbitration of disputes between states, state entities, intergovernmental organizations, and private parties. The PCA is not a court in the traditional sense but facilitates the establishment of ad hoc arbitral tribunals.

• International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): An institution of the World Bank Group, ICSID is designed to resolve disputes between investors and states. It operates under the ICSID Convention, which allows for arbitration of disputes arising from international investment agreements.

C. Arbitral Procedure

• Compromis (Agreement to Arbitrate): Arbitration begins when states agree to submit their dispute to arbitration, detailing the scope of the dispute, the tribunal's jurisdiction, and the applicable law.

• Appointment of Arbitrators: The parties usually appoint arbitrators of their choice, who must be impartial and independent. Tribunals typically consist of an odd number of arbitrators to avoid deadlocks.

• Proceedings: The arbitral process includes written submissions, oral hearings, and, in some cases, the presentation of evidence and witnesses. The process is less formal and rigid compared to court proceedings.

• Award: The arbitral tribunal issues an award that is binding on the parties. The award can address issues of compensation, restitution, or cessation of wrongful acts.

D. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Enforcement of arbitral awards in international law can be challenging due to the absence of a centralized enforcement mechanism. States are expected to comply voluntarily. However, if the award relates to a treaty-based dispute or an investment dispute under ICSID, specific enforcement mechanisms may apply. In the case of the PCA, enforcement may also rely on diplomatic pressure or recourse to the UN Security Council.

3. Principles and Considerations

Judicial and arbitral settlement in international law operate under several fundamental principles:

• Consent of the Parties: Whether through judicial or arbitral settlement, the fundamental principle is that of state consent. No state can be compelled to submit to dispute resolution without its consent, unless it has previously agreed to compulsory jurisdiction through treaties.

• Sovereign Equality of States: States are considered equal under international law, and the procedures are designed to ensure that no state has undue advantage over another.

• Peaceful Settlement of Disputes: Article 2(3) of the UN Charter mandates the peaceful settlement of disputes to avoid endangering international peace and security.

• Pacta Sunt Servanda: This principle means that agreements must be kept. It underpins the enforceability of arbitral awards and judicial decisions between states.

Conclusion

Judicial and arbitral settlement are vital tools in Public International Law for maintaining international peace and order. They provide legal means for resolving disputes, ensuring that states act in accordance with international law. While the ICJ is the leading institution for judicial settlement, arbitration offers states greater flexibility and control in resolving disputes. Both methods rely on state consent, and enforcement of decisions often depends on the cooperation of states and international mechanisms like the UN Security Council.