Yes. A wife may file a petition for legal separation and pursue a Violence Against Women and Their Children case at the same time in the Philippines. The two proceedings serve different purposes: legal separation addresses the spouses’ marital, property, custody, and inheritance relations, while a VAWC case may provide immediate protection and impose criminal or civil consequences for abuse. Filing one generally does not require the woman to wait for the other to finish.

The important question is not simply whether both cases can be filed, but which remedies are needed, where each filing belongs, what evidence supports each one, and how the cases may affect custody, support, property, and personal safety.

Legal Separation and VAWC Are Different Legal Remedies

Legal separation and a VAWC case can arise from the same abusive conduct, but they are legally distinct.

Issue	Legal separation	VAWC proceeding
Main law	Family Code of the Philippines	Republic Act No. 9262
Primary purpose	Allow spouses to live separately and settle property, custody, support, and succession consequences	Protect women and children from abuse and punish acts defined as VAWC
Nature of proceeding	Civil family case	May involve a protection-order proceeding, a criminal complaint, or both
Where filed	Regional Trial Court acting as a Family Court	Barangay, Family Court, prosecutor’s office, or criminal court, depending on the remedy
Who may initiate it	Only the husband or wife	The offended woman, and in certain protection-order applications, other persons authorized by law
Does it end the marriage?	No	No
Can the parties remarry afterward?	No	No
Typical urgent remedies	Custody, support, property administration, visitation arrangements	Stay-away orders, removal from the home, no-contact orders, support, custody, firearm surrender, and other protective measures

A decree of legal separation does not dissolve the marriage. Under Article 63 of the Family Code, the spouses may live separately, but they remain legally married and cannot marry other people.

A VAWC complaint also does not dissolve or invalidate the marriage. Its purpose is to stop and address violence committed by a husband, former husband, boyfriend, former boyfriend, dating partner, former dating partner, or a person with whom the woman has a common child.

The Legal Basis for Filing Both Cases at the Same Time

Nothing in the Family Code or Republic Act No. 9262, the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004, requires a woman to choose between legal separation and VAWC remedies.

The cases involve different causes of action and different legal consequences. The same incident may therefore be relevant to both proceedings.

For example:

Repeated beatings may constitute a ground for legal separation and physical violence under RA 9262.
Severe verbal abuse and controlling conduct may support a claim of grossly abusive conduct in a legal-separation case and psychological violence in a VAWC case.
Sexual infidelity may be a ground for legal separation and may also form part of psychological violence when the manner in which it is committed causes proven mental or emotional anguish.
Abandonment for more than one year may be a ground for legal separation, while abandonment, withholding support, or using children as leverage may constitute psychological or economic abuse under RA 9262.
Threatening to harm the wife or children may justify a protection order even before a legal-separation petition reaches trial.

The evidence may overlap, but each case must independently satisfy its own legal elements.

Grounds for Legal Separation in the Philippines

Article 55 of the Family Code of the Philippines recognizes the following grounds:

Repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct against the petitioner, a common child, or the petitioner’s child.
Physical violence or moral pressure intended to force a change in religious or political affiliation.
Attempting to corrupt or induce the petitioner or a child to engage in prostitution, or cooperating in such conduct.
A final judgment sentencing the respondent to imprisonment for more than six years, even if later pardoned.
Drug addiction or habitual alcoholism.
Lesbianism or homosexuality of the respondent.
Contracting a subsequent bigamous marriage in the Philippines or abroad.
Sexual infidelity or perversion.
An attempt on the petitioner’s life.
Abandonment without justifiable cause for more than one year.

The petition must be filed within five years from the occurrence of the ground, under Article 57 of the Family Code and the Supreme Court Rule on Legal Separation.

Legal separation requires proof of a statutory ground

General incompatibility, constant arguments, emotional distance, or simply “falling out of love” is not enough by itself. The petitioner must prove at least one ground listed in Article 55.

The court cannot grant legal separation solely because both spouses agree. Article 60 prohibits a decree based only on an agreed statement of facts or a confession of judgment. The public prosecutor participates to prevent collusion and fabricated or suppressed evidence.

Grounds that may cause the petition to be denied

Under Article 56, a legal-separation petition may be denied when:

The innocent spouse condoned or forgave the specific offense in a legally significant way.
The innocent spouse consented to the conduct.
The spouses connived in committing the act.
Both spouses committed acts giving grounds for legal separation.
The spouses colluded to obtain the decree.
The five-year filing period has expired.

Continuing to live in the same house does not automatically prove condonation. Victims may remain because of financial dependence, threats, concern for the children, lack of alternative housing, or fear of escalation. The court examines the circumstances and the parties’ conduct.

What Conduct May Constitute VAWC?

RA 9262 covers violence committed against a woman who is or was the offender’s:

Wife;
Former wife;
Dating partner or former dating partner;
Sexual partner or former sexual partner; or
Co-parent of a common child.

It also protects the woman’s child, whether legitimate or illegitimate, and a child under her care in circumstances covered by the law.

Physical violence

This includes acts that cause bodily or physical harm, such as:

Hitting, slapping, kicking, choking, or pushing;
Throwing objects at the victim;
Confining or restraining her;
Threatening or attempting physical injury;
Using a weapon to intimidate or harm her.

A victim does not need to wait for severe or permanent injuries before seeking protection.

Sexual violence

Sexual violence may include:

Forcing or coercing sexual acts;
Treating the woman or child as a sexual object;
Forcing the victim to watch pornography or indecent acts;
Forcing sexual activity through threats, intimidation, or physical force;
Attacking sexual parts of the body;
Forcing the victim into prostitution.

Marriage is not blanket consent to every sexual act. A spouse may be held liable for conduct that falls within RA 9262 or other criminal laws.

Psychological violence

Psychological violence refers to acts or omissions that cause or are likely to cause mental or emotional suffering. Examples may include:

Repeated verbal and emotional abuse;
Threats of harm;
Public humiliation or ridicule;
Harassment, stalking, and intimidation;
Destroying property to frighten the victim;
Preventing access to the children;
Using custody or visitation to punish the mother;
Repeated infidelity carried out in a manner that causes mental anguish;
Abandonment accompanied by emotional abuse or deliberate withholding of support.

Psychological violence is the abusive conduct; mental or emotional anguish is its harmful effect. The Supreme Court has emphasized that the law does not require proof that the woman developed a medically diagnosed psychological illness. However, the prosecution must still establish the required elements, including the victim’s actual mental or emotional suffering where the charged provision requires it.

In Acharon v. People, G.R. No. 224946, November 9, 2021, the Supreme Court clarified that failure to provide support is not automatically a crime under Section 5(i) of RA 9262. The prosecution must prove that the accused willfully denied support for the purpose of causing mental or emotional anguish, together with the other elements of the offense.

Likewise, marital infidelity is not automatically VAWC in every case. In decisions involving Section 5(i), the Supreme Court has distinguished the unfaithful act itself from psychological violence that causes proven mental or emotional suffering. Evidence must connect the accused’s conduct to the anguish suffered by the woman.

Economic abuse

Economic abuse may involve acts intended to make or keep the woman financially dependent, including:

Withholding money for food, medicine, schooling, housing, or basic needs;
Preventing the woman from working or operating a business;
Taking or controlling her salary;
Destroying household property or work equipment;
Controlling conjugal or community funds to deprive her of resources;
Disposing of property to defeat her lawful financial rights;
Denying access to financial records or common assets as a form of control.

A dispute over money is not automatically economic abuse. The context, intent, pattern of control, legal obligation to provide support, and resulting harm are important.

A Protection Order Is Different From a Criminal VAWC Case

People often use the phrase “VAWC case” to refer to several different remedies.

Barangay Protection Order

A Barangay Protection Order, or BPO, may be issued by the Punong Barangay or, when unavailable, an authorized kagawad.

A BPO generally orders the respondent to stop committing or threatening physical harm. It is designed for immediate intervention and is effective for 15 days. The application should be acted upon on the date it is filed.

A victim is not required to undergo mediation, confrontation, or barangay conciliation with the alleged abuser. RA 9262 prohibits barangay officials and courts from pressuring the victim to compromise or abandon the relief she seeks.

Temporary Protection Order

A Temporary Protection Order, or TPO, may be issued by the court without first hearing the respondent when the verified application and supporting evidence justify immediate protection.

A TPO is effective for 30 days. The court may include relief such as:

Prohibiting threats, harassment, contact, or communication;
Ordering the respondent to stay away from the victim, children, home, school, or workplace;
Removing the respondent from the residence, regardless of ownership, when legally justified;
Granting temporary custody;
Directing the respondent to provide support;
Prohibiting possession or use of firearms and ordering their surrender;
Allowing the victim to retrieve personal belongings;
Granting other relief necessary for safety.

Permanent Protection Order

A Permanent Protection Order, or PPO, is issued after notice and hearing. It remains effective until revoked by the court.

“Permanent” does not necessarily mean that every term can never be modified. Custody, support, visitation, and safety conditions may require later court action when circumstances change.

Criminal complaint under RA 9262

A criminal complaint is ordinarily initiated through the Office of the City or Provincial Prosecutor, although the precise procedure depends on the offense, penalty, and circumstances.

The prosecutor conducts preliminary investigation when required. The respondent may be directed to submit a counter-affidavit and supporting evidence. If the prosecutor finds probable cause, an Information is filed in court.

A protection order can be sought even while the criminal complaint is under investigation or trial. The victim does not have to wait for a criminal conviction before requesting protective relief.

How to File Legal Separation and VAWC Proceedings at the Same Time

1. Address immediate safety first

If violence is occurring or appears imminent:

Call the Philippine National Police or go to the nearest police station or Women and Children Protection Desk.
Seek medical care immediately.
Request police assistance in leaving the residence or retrieving essential belongings.
Apply for a BPO or seek a TPO from the court.
Bring children to a safe location when legally and practically possible.
Avoid informing the respondent of plans to leave when doing so could increase danger.

The filing strategy should not expose the victim to retaliation. Court papers, notices, addresses, and communication arrangements must be handled carefully.

2. Document each incident separately

Prepare a chronological account containing:

Date and approximate time;
Place of incident;
What the respondent said or did;
Injuries or property damage;
Names of witnesses;
Police or barangay response;
Medical treatment received;
Messages sent before or after the incident;
Effect on the woman and children;
Financial support withheld or expenses left unpaid.

Specific facts are more useful than broad statements such as “He always abuses me.” A strong record explains what occurred, when it occurred, how often it occurred, and what evidence confirms it.

3. Preserve evidence lawfully

Useful evidence may include:

Medical certificates and hospital records;
Photographs of injuries or damaged property;
Police blotter entries and incident reports;
Barangay records and protection orders;
Text messages, emails, chat messages, and voice messages;
Screenshots showing the sender, date, time, and surrounding conversation;
Bank records, remittance records, payroll documents, and proof of expenses;
School records showing unpaid tuition or disruption to the children;
Witness affidavits;
Psychological or psychiatric records, when available;
Marriage certificate and children’s birth certificates;
Proof of cohabitation, dating relationship, or common child when the parties are not married.

Keep original files whenever possible. Do not rely only on cropped screenshots. Back up digital evidence in a secure account or device that the respondent cannot access.

Secret recording raises evidentiary and privacy issues under the Anti-Wiretapping Act, Republic Act No. 4200. A recording should not be made or published casually without assessing whether it was lawfully obtained.

4. Apply for the appropriate protection order

The victim may seek a BPO for immediate limited protection or apply directly to the court for a TPO and PPO.

Under RA 9262, an application for a protection order may be filed by authorized persons, including:

The offended woman;
Her parents or guardians;
Ascendants, descendants, or collateral relatives within the fourth civil degree;
Social workers;
Police officers;
The Punong Barangay or kagawad;
A lawyer, counselor, therapist, or healthcare provider;
At least two concerned responsible citizens of the community who have personal knowledge of the abuse.

The application should clearly request every needed form of relief. Omitting custody, support, stay-away distances, workplace protection, school protection, firearm surrender, or retrieval of belongings may result in an order that does not fully address the danger.

5. File the criminal complaint, when supported by the facts

The complaint-affidavit should identify the particular acts alleged to violate RA 9262. It should not merely list legal conclusions.

The filing usually includes:

Complaint-affidavit;
Witness affidavits;
Medical documents;
Police and barangay records;
Digital evidence;
Financial records;
Civil-registry documents;
Existing protection orders;
Other supporting exhibits.

Several incidents may fall under different paragraphs of Section 5 of RA 9262. The proper charge depends on the exact conduct, relationship, injury, threats, purpose, and evidence.

6. Prepare and file the legal-separation petition

The petition is filed with the Regional Trial Court acting as a Family Court in the province or city where either spouse has resided for at least six months before filing. If the respondent is a nonresident, the petition may generally be filed where the respondent may be found in the Philippines, subject to the applicable rule.

The petition must:

State the complete facts constituting the ground for legal separation;
Identify the common children and their ages;
State the spouses’ property regime;
Identify relevant property and known creditors;
Request provisional relief when needed;
Be verified by the petitioner;
Include a certification against forum shopping;
Comply with the requirements of the Rule on Legal Separation.

The petitioner must personally sign the verification and certification against forum shopping. A lawyer or attorney-in-fact cannot sign them in the petitioner’s place.

7. Disclose the related cases

The legal-separation petition, protection-order application, and criminal complaint should accurately disclose related proceedings when required.

Courts need to know about existing orders involving:

Custody;
Child support;
Spousal support;
Visitation;
Stay-away restrictions;
Use or possession of the family home;
Property administration;
Firearms;
Pending criminal charges.

Different courts should not unknowingly issue contradictory orders. Copies of relevant orders should be provided in the related proceedings through the proper filing process.

8. Seek coordinated provisional relief

Pending legal separation, the Family Court may issue provisional orders concerning:

Spousal support;
Custody and support of common children;
Visitation;
Administration of community or conjugal property;
Use of the family residence;
Other urgent family matters.

A VAWC protection order may provide overlapping relief. The requested terms should be consistent and should account for safety concerns.

An ordinary visitation arrangement may be unsafe when there are threats, stalking, child manipulation, or violence. The court may need to consider supervised visitation, neutral exchange locations, restricted communication, or temporary suspension where justified by the child’s best interests and safety.

What Happens to the Legal-Separation Case While the VAWC Case Is Pending?

The legal-separation case does not ordinarily have to stop simply because a VAWC complaint or criminal case is pending.

However, practical coordination may be necessary because:

The same witnesses may testify in both cases.
The same messages, medical records, and police reports may be offered as evidence.
A protection order may affect personal contact, mediation, visitation, and court appearances.
Statements made under oath in one case may be compared with statements made in another.
A criminal conviction may become relevant evidence, although legal separation need not always wait for a final conviction when the ground can be proved independently.
Disclosure of evidence may be governed by different procedural rules.

The woman should maintain one accurate timeline across all pleadings and affidavits. Minor differences caused by trauma or the passage of time do not automatically make a complaint false, but unexplained major inconsistencies can weaken credibility.

Does the Six-Month “Cooling-Off Period” Prevent Immediate Protection?

No.

Article 58 of the Family Code provides that a legal-separation action cannot be tried before six months have passed from filing. This is commonly called the cooling-off period.

It does not mean that the victim must continue living with the abusive spouse or remain without protection. Article 61 allows the spouses to live separately after the legal-separation petition is filed. Courts may also issue provisional orders concerning support, custody, property administration, and related urgent matters.

More importantly, the cooling-off rule does not suspend or delay remedies under RA 9262. A BPO, TPO, criminal complaint, police intervention, or emergency medical treatment may be pursued immediately.

Documents Commonly Needed

Document	Legal separation	Protection order or VAWC complaint
PSA marriage certificate	Usually required	Helpful to prove the relationship
PSA birth certificates of children	Usually required when there are children	Important for custody, support, and proof of a common child
Proof of residence	Important for venue	May be relevant to venue and requested relief
Government-issued identification	Commonly required	Commonly required
Detailed incident chronology	Essential	Essential
Medical certificate or hospital records	Useful when violence is alleged	Highly important in physical-violence cases
Police or barangay records	Useful	Important
Messages, emails, photographs, recordings	Useful	Important if lawfully obtained
Property records	Important for liquidation and administration	Relevant when economic abuse or property destruction is alleged
Income and expense records	Relevant to support and property issues	Relevant to support and economic abuse
Existing court or protection orders	Must be disclosed when relevant	Must be disclosed when relevant
Witness affidavits	Often needed	Often needed

A PSA certificate is generally preferable to an ordinary photocopy of the local civil-registry record.

Filing From Abroad

A Filipino living overseas may still pursue legal separation in the Philippines if jurisdiction and venue requirements are met.

Under the Rule on Legal Separation, the petition cannot be filed solely through an attorney-in-fact. The petitioner must personally sign the verification and certification against forum shopping.

The Rule states that when the petitioner is abroad, these documents must be authenticated by an authorized Philippine diplomatic or consular officer. In practice, counsel should check the current requirements of the court and the relevant Philippine embassy or consulate. Depending on the document and country, consular notarization or apostille procedures may also be relevant, but apostille treatment should not be assumed to replace a specific procedural requirement stated in the Supreme Court rule.

Foreign-issued documents may need:

Apostille or proper authentication;
Certified English translation if written in another language;
Proof of the foreign law when the court must determine its meaning or effect;
Certified copies from the issuing authority;
Compliance with Philippine evidentiary rules.

Remote appearance may be requested in appropriate circumstances, but videoconferencing is subject to the court’s authority, applicable Supreme Court rules, and technical arrangements. It should not be assumed that every hearing can be attended remotely.

Special Considerations for Foreign Spouses

RA 9262 can apply even when the respondent is a foreign national, provided the legal elements and Philippine jurisdictional requirements are satisfied.

A foreign spouse’s immigration status does not excuse violence. Conversely, a VAWC complaint does not automatically cancel a visa, deport the respondent, or dissolve the marriage. Immigration consequences require a separate legal basis and appropriate proceedings before the Bureau of Immigration or other authorities.

A foreign spouse should also understand that:

Legal separation does not permit remarriage.
A divorce obtained abroad may raise a separate issue under Article 26(2) of the Family Code when one spouse is a foreign national.
Judicial recognition of a foreign divorce is a different proceeding from legal separation and VAWC.
The foreign divorce decree and the foreign law allowing the divorce must generally be properly proved in a Philippine court.
Child custody and support may still require Philippine proceedings even when a foreign divorce exists.

Effects of a Decree of Legal Separation

Under Articles 63 and 64 of the Family Code, a final decree generally has the following effects:

The spouses may live separately.
The marriage remains valid and neither spouse may remarry.
The absolute community or conjugal partnership is dissolved and liquidated.
The offending spouse loses the right to share in the net profits of the community or partnership, subject to the Family Code.
Custody of minor children is resolved according to law and the children’s best interests.
The offending spouse is disqualified from inheriting from the innocent spouse through intestate succession.
Testamentary provisions in favor of the offending spouse are revoked by operation of law.
The innocent spouse may seek revocation of certain donations and insurance-beneficiary designations, subject to the legal requirements and periods.

The decree is issued only after the required judgment, registration, and property-liquidation procedures are completed, unless there is no property requiring liquidation.

Timelines and Common Delays

There is no reliable fixed completion time for either proceeding.

Legal separation

A legal-separation case cannot be tried until at least six months after filing. In actual practice, the full case can take considerably longer because of:

Difficulty serving summons;
Publication when the respondent cannot be located;
Congested court calendars;
Prosecutor investigation into possible collusion;
Mandatory pretrial requirements;
Disputes over custody, support, and property;
Numerous witnesses or documentary exhibits;
Property valuation and liquidation;
Motions, postponements, and appeals;
Registration of the judgment and decree.

Protection orders and VAWC complaints

A BPO and an ex parte TPO are intended to provide rapid protection. A PPO requires notice and hearing.

A criminal complaint may take longer because of:

Preliminary investigation;
Difficulty serving subpoenas;
Counter-affidavits and motions;
Prosecutorial review;
Court arraignment and pretrial;
Trial scheduling;
Witness availability;
Digital-evidence authentication;
Appeals.

An urgent protection application should not be delayed merely because the criminal case may take time.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Treating every marital problem as a criminal offense

Infidelity, failure to communicate, or disagreements about money are not automatically VAWC. The complaint must establish the acts, purpose or intent where required, relationship, and resulting harm specified by law.

Waiting for the legal-separation case before seeking protection

Legal separation is not an emergency remedy. A person facing immediate danger should use police assistance and protection-order procedures without waiting for the family case to progress.

Filing vague or inconsistent affidavits

Affidavits should contain concrete events, not copied legal phrases. Dates, locations, exact conduct, witnesses, and consequences should be stated as accurately as possible.

Assuming a police blotter proves the whole case

A blotter entry helps document that a report was made, but it does not by itself prove every allegation. Medical records, testimony, messages, photographs, financial documents, and other evidence may still be necessary.

Deleting messages after taking screenshots

The original device, full message thread, metadata, account details, and backup copies may be needed to authenticate digital evidence.

Posting evidence publicly

Publishing accusations, private conversations, children’s identities, medical information, or intimate material online may create privacy, safety, evidentiary, or separate legal problems. Evidence is generally better preserved for lawful submission to authorities and courts.

Using the children as messengers

When a protection order limits contact, communication should follow the order precisely. Children should not be used to transmit threats, settlement demands, or information about court strategy.

Assuming reconciliation automatically erases criminal liability

Reconciliation may terminate a pending legal-separation proceeding under Article 66 of the Family Code. It does not automatically dismiss a criminal VAWC case, which is prosecuted in the name of the People of the Philippines.

The legal effect of an affidavit of desistance is limited. It may affect the evidence available, but it does not automatically compel prosecutors or courts to dismiss a criminal case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I file legal separation and VAWC against my husband on the same day?

Yes. The filings may be initiated at around the same time if the facts support both. They will usually be filed in different offices or proceedings, and each must comply with its own requirements.

Do I need a barangay hearing before filing a VAWC complaint?

No. VAWC cases are not subject to compulsory confrontation, mediation, or settlement through the Katarungang Pambarangay process. A victim may request a Barangay Protection Order, but she should not be pressured to reconcile or compromise.

Can I obtain a protection order without filing legal separation?

Yes. A woman does not need to be legally separated, physically separated for a particular period, or planning to end the relationship before requesting protection under RA 9262.

Can I file legal separation based on one incident of physical violence?

Article 55 refers to “repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct.” A single incident may still be relevant if it amounts to grossly abusive conduct or supports another statutory ground, but the court will assess the seriousness and complete circumstances. A single act may also independently support a VAWC complaint or protection order.

Is cheating automatically psychological violence under RA 9262?

No. Sexual infidelity is expressly a ground for legal separation, but it is not automatically criminal psychological violence. For a charge under Section 5(i), the prosecution must prove the specific abusive conduct and the mental or emotional anguish required by law.

Can I ask for child support in both proceedings?

Support may be requested in a protection-order case and through provisional orders in the legal-separation case. Existing orders must be disclosed so that courts can avoid duplication or conflict. Amounts are determined based on the children’s needs and the parents’ resources, subject to the Family Code and applicable evidence.

Will filing VAWC automatically give me sole custody?

No. A protection order may grant temporary custody when justified, but long-term custody is determined according to law and the child’s best interests. Evidence of violence, threats, coercive control, neglect, and the child’s safety is highly relevant.

Can my husband force me to attend mediation after I file VAWC?

He cannot use mediation to compel contact prohibited by a protection order. RA 9262 prohibits officials from pressuring the victim to compromise. In the legal-separation case, court processes concerning possible reconciliation or mediation must be handled consistently with safety and existing protective orders.

Can a VAWC conviction automatically grant legal separation?

No. A conviction may be strong evidence, but the Family Court must still determine whether a ground under Article 55 has been properly alleged and proved. Legal separation cannot be granted automatically based on agreement, default, or confession alone.

Can I remarry after winning both cases?

No. Neither legal separation nor a VAWC conviction dissolves the marriage. Remarriage is possible only if the prior marriage is legally terminated or declared void through a legally recognized process that permits remarriage.

Key Takeaways

A woman may pursue legal separation, a protection order, and a criminal VAWC complaint at the same time when the facts support each remedy.
Legal separation regulates the spouses’ marital, property, custody, support, and inheritance relations but does not dissolve the marriage.
RA 9262 provides protection and possible criminal liability for physical, sexual, psychological, and economic abuse.
The same conduct may support both proceedings, but each case has separate elements that must be proved.
The six-month waiting period in a legal-separation case does not prevent immediate police intervention, protection orders, support, custody, or other urgent relief.
Detailed timelines, medical documents, messages, financial records, police reports, and witness accounts can be critical.
Related cases and existing orders should be disclosed to prevent conflicting rulings on custody, support, contact, property, and use of the family home.
A Barangay Protection Order lasts 15 days, a Temporary Protection Order generally lasts 30 days, and a Permanent Protection Order remains effective until revoked by the court.
Reconciliation may end legal-separation proceedings but does not automatically terminate a criminal VAWC prosecution.
Winning legal separation and VAWC cases does not allow either spouse to remarry.