General information only. Not a substitute for advice from a Philippine lawyer.

Big picture

Yes—verbal abuse by an ex can be a crime, a civil wrong, and grounds for protection orders in the Philippines. Which path fits best depends on (1) your relationship to the abuser, (2) the kind of words or conduct used, (3) where and how it happened (in person/online/workplace), and (4) the evidence you can show.

What counts as “verbal abuse”?

Courts look beyond a single insult and focus on words or patterns of speech that cause fear, humiliation, mental or emotional suffering, intimidation, or reputational harm. This can include:

Repeated insults, name-calling, threats to harm you or your family, degrading slurs
Public humiliation, shaming, or spreading degrading rumors
Berating messages, incessant calls, or harassment online (PMs, comments, posts)
Coercive or controlling statements (“you can’t talk to anyone,” “I’ll ruin your job”)

The same words may lead to different legal consequences depending on context (private vs. public, workplace vs. street, ex-partner vs. stranger, online vs. offline).

Criminal options (depending on the facts)

1) Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children (VAWC) — RA 9262

When it applies: The victim is a woman (or her child) and the abuser is a current/former husband, live-in partner, boyfriend, dating partner, or co-parent. It covers “psychological violence,” which includes verbal and emotional abuse that causes mental or emotional anguish.
Why it’s powerful: You can pursue criminal charges and also get Protection Orders (BPO/TPO/PPO) that can order the ex to stop harassment, stay away, and even provide support.
Note on coverage: RA 9262 is not gender-neutral; male or LGBTQ+ victims who are not covered need to look at the other laws below.

2) Oral defamation (slander) — Revised Penal Code

When it applies: The ex publicly or privately utters statements imputing something dishonorable to you. Gravity depends on the seriousness and context of the insult.
Typical fact patterns: Publicly calling you an adulterer, thief, or other degrading accusations; a tirade at a family event; a viral video yelling defamatory words.

3) Grave or light threats — Revised Penal Code

When it applies: Statements that threaten you with a wrong, e.g., bodily harm or damaging accusations, with or without conditions (“I’ll kill you,” “I’ll burn your shop,” “I’ll post your nudes if you don’t…”).

4) Grave coercion / unjust vexation — Revised Penal Code

When it applies: Words coupled with coercion or persistent harassment that unduly restricts your freedom or annoys/disturbs you without authority of law (often used when conduct is harassing but not neatly covered elsewhere).

5) Safe Spaces Act (Gender-Based Sexual Harassment) — RA 11313

When it applies: Gender-based harassment in public spaces, online, workplaces, or educational institutions (e.g., catcalling, misogynistic/sexist, homophobic or transphobic remarks, slut-shaming, unwanted sexual remarks sent via chat).
Coverage: Gender-neutral; applies regardless of relationship.

6) Anti-Sexual Harassment Act — RA 7877

When it applies: Workplace or school setting where a person in authority/peer engages in sexual harassment, including verbal forms that create a hostile environment.

7) Child protection laws — RA 7610 and related statutes

When it applies: The victim is a child. Verbal and emotional abuse that harms a child’s psychological well-being can be prosecuted.

8) Cybercrime Prevention Act — RA 10175

When it applies: The abuse occurs online (posts, PMs, emails, comments). It elevates penalties for certain crimes committed through ICT (e.g., online libel, online threats, online gender-based harassment via the Safe Spaces Act).
Practical tip: Screenshots and platform logs become key.

Choosing among these: You’re not limited to one theory. Prosecutors often evaluate multiple possible charges from the same conduct (e.g., VAWC + threats; Safe Spaces + cyber components).

Civil remedies (money damages and injunctions)

Even without a criminal case—or alongside one—you may sue for damages under the Civil Code:

Articles 19, 20, 21 (human relations): Liability for acting contrary to morals, good customs, or public policy, or willfully/negligently causing damage.
Article 26: Liability for meddling with privacy, besmirching reputation, or offending dignity.
Damages recoverable: Actual (out-of-pocket), moral (emotional distress), exemplary (to deter), attorney’s fees in proper cases.
Injunctions: Courts can issue temporary restraining orders (TRO) or injunctions in civil cases to stop ongoing harassment.

Protection Orders (fast, practical protection)

If eligible under RA 9262, you may ask for:

Barangay Protection Order (BPO): From the Punong Barangay; quick relief against acts of violence (including psychological/verbal abuse) without fees.
Temporary Protection Order (TPO): From the court, often ex parte, effective immediately for a short period.
Permanent Protection Order (PPO): After a hearing; longer-term. These can prohibit contact, order the abuser to stay away, remove firearms, grant custody/ support, and more.

Outside RA 9262, courts can still issue TROs/injunctions in civil cases; schools/workplaces can issue administrative protective measures; platforms can act on report/ban requests for online abuse.

Evidence: what works—and what to avoid

Strong, commonly accepted evidence

Electronic communications: Texts, chats, emails, DMs, comment threads, posts, and call logs. Preserve full screenshots with timestamps, usernames/URLs, and message headers when possible. Export chat histories; keep original files.
Rule on Electronic Evidence: Philippine courts recognize electronic documents if authenticity can be shown (who sent, integrity of storage, how obtained).
Witness testimony: Friends/family/co-workers who heard the abuse or saw your distress.
Professional records: Medical or psychological evaluations, therapy notes, prescriptions (to prove mental/emotional harm).
Photos/videos: Of incidents where words were used (e.g., a recorded outburst in a public place), provided recording complied with law (see below).
Administrative/official records: Barangay blotters, incident reports, HR complaints, school memos, platform takedown receipts.
Pattern evidence: A timeline showing frequency, escalation, and impact (missed work, grades, sleep issues).

Be careful with audio recordings (Anti-Wiretapping Law — RA 4200)

The law generally prohibits recording private communications without consent of all parties. Secretly recording a private phone call or a closed-door conversation can itself be illegal and inadmissible.
Safer alternatives: Preserve texts/chats, get witnesses, or record public interactions where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy (but context matters). When in doubt, don’t make secret audio recordings; ask a lawyer how to document safely.

Authenticity & chain of custody

Keep original files/devices where messages were received.
When printing screenshots, note the date/time pulled and who printed. If possible, keep a forensic copy (e.g., full chat export).
Avoid altering images (cropping/redaction can be explained, but don’t edit content).

Where to file and what to expect

Criminal route

Initial report: Barangay (for blotter or BPO under RA 9262), police station (WCPD for VAWC), or NBI/CIDG for cyber components.
Sworn complaint & evidence: Submit to the Prosecutor’s Office for inquest (if arrested) or preliminary investigation (if not).
Resolution & filing: If probable cause is found, the prosecutor files an Information in court.
Trial: The court hears the case; proof beyond reasonable doubt is required for conviction.

Civil route

Complaint in the proper Regional Trial Court or first-level court (venue and court level depend on the claim).
Interim relief: You may apply for TRO/injunction to stop ongoing harassment.
Standard of proof: Preponderance of evidence (more likely than not).

Protection orders (RA 9262)

You can directly apply for BPO/TPO/PPO with the barangay or court. TPOs can be issued ex parte (without the abuser present) on the same day in urgent cases.

Barangay conciliation: Many criminal cases (and VAWC cases) are not subject to mandatory barangay mediation. Filing directly with police/prosecutor is typical for these.

Penalties (high-level overview)

VAWC (psychological violence): Imprisonment (often prisión mayor range for certain acts), fines, and mandatory counseling; plus protective conditions.
Oral defamation: Penalties vary with gravity (grave vs. slight).
Threats/coercion/unjust vexation: Usually arresto-level penalties/fines, depending on seriousness.
Safe Spaces Act: Fines, community service, and stiffer penalties for repeat offenses; additional sanctions for online harassment.
Cybercrime (online version of offenses): Higher penalties than the offline counterparts.

Exact ranges depend on case classification and aggravating/mitigating circumstances; a lawyer can map these to your facts.

If you’re not covered by RA 9262

Men or LGBTQ+ victims of an ex can rely on Safe Spaces Act, threats, oral defamation, coercion/unjust vexation, civil damages, and cybercrime provisions.
If the abuse happened in a workplace/school, consider RA 7877 and internal administrative remedies.

Practical playbook (evidence-first)

Go quiet, start collecting: Stop arguing. Save everything (screenshots with timestamps, URLs, chat exports).
Document impact: Keep a journal of episodes and effects (panic attacks, missed work). See a doctor/psychologist if affected—this creates objective proof.
Consider immediate protection: If eligible, seek a BPO/TPO. Even without RA 9262, explore TRO/injunction or platform takedowns for online abuse.
Report appropriately:
- VAWC: Barangay WCPD/Police WCPD; apply for protection order.
- Online abuse: NBI Cybercrime or police cyber units.
- Work/school: HR/OSHA/discipline offices; file formal complaints.
Consult counsel early: A lawyer can frame charges, avoid wiretapping pitfalls, and choose venue to keep you safe.

Common pitfalls

Secret audio recordings of private talks (risking violation of RA 4200).
Cropping/editing screenshots without keeping originals.
Public retaliation posts that could expose you to counter-charges (defamation).
Letting deadlines lapse (some offenses have short prescriptive periods).
Skipping medical/psychological documentation when you’re already suffering.

FAQs

Can I sue my ex for just one nasty outburst? Possibly, but pattern and impact matter. A single remark may fit oral defamation; repeated harassment better supports psychological violence or Safe Spaces claims.

What if the abuse is only online? You can still proceed—cybercrime provisions and the Safe Spaces Act apply. Preserve full threads, not just isolated messages.

Do I need a lawyer? Not strictly to report or seek a BPO, but having counsel greatly improves strategy, evidence handling, and safety planning—especially if you want both criminal and civil relief.

Will I have to face my ex in court? For TPOs, courts can act ex parte initially. Criminal trials require testimony, but courts can adopt measures to protect victims.

Quick chooser (start here)

You’re a woman; he’s an ex-partner; repeated degrading messages causing anxiety: Start with RA 9262 + TPO; add cybercrime if online.
He posted lies that ruined your reputation: Oral defamation (and online libel if posted), plus civil damages.
He threatens to hurt you or leak private content: Grave/light threats (and cybercrime if online) + TPO/BPO.
Workplace sexual comments from an ex who’s a colleague: RA 7877 + company HR complaint; possibly Safe Spaces and defamation.

Final note

Every case turns on facts and proof. If you’re in immediate danger, prioritize safety and protection orders; then work with counsel to align criminal, civil, and administrative remedies to your situation.