Change Minor’s Surname to Biological Father Philippines

Writing Legal Article

Okay, I'm thinking it's best to write a thorough legal article where I'll explore the context of a child being registered with their mother's surname but the father wants to change it after acknowledging paternity. I'll start with an introduction emphasizing that situation and the legal framework around it, based on Article 176 of the Family Code and RA 9255. The father’s acknowledgment requirements should be clear too, such as via a birth certificate or other legal documents and both parents agreeing to an AUSF.

Clarifying Legal Procedures

For children aged 7 to 17, their written consent is needed, but those 18 and above are independent. If the child is under 7, the mother signs instead. I'll include the necessary documentary requirements like a PSA birth certificate and IDs. For late registration, there are procedures for correction under RA 9048 and RA 9255, focusing on surnames. I’ll also discuss cases around paternal acknowledgment and changes to a child's surname due to legitimation, particularly with foreign fathers. I’ll wrap up with timeframes, fees, and other technicalities.

Thought for 23 seconds


Changing a Minor’s Surname to That of the Biological Father in the Philippines

(A comprehensive guide based entirely on Philippine statutes, regulations, and jurisprudence in force as of 25 May 2025)


1. Why the issue arises

A child born out of wedlock is illegitimate under Article 165 of the Family Code. By default Article 176 (now Art. 175 as renumbered) says the child “shall use the surname of the mother.” Yet children frequently come to be voluntarily acknowledged by the man who is in truth their biological father. He, the mother, or later the child may want the birth record to show the father’s surname—for social identity, inheritance, school and passport purposes, etc. Philippine law supplies several routes, the most common of which is Republic Act (R.A.) 9255.


2. The four legal pathways, at a glance

Pathway Governing law Forum Typical users
A. Affidavit to Use the Surname of the Father (AUSF) R.A. 9255 (2004) & its 2004 IRR + 2016 PSA Manual of Instructions Administrative: Local Civil Registrar (LCR) Majority of cases where the father already voluntarily acknowledges paternity
B. Legitimation by Subsequent Marriage Arts. 177 – 182 Family Code; R.A. 9858 (for void marriages) LCR after the parents marry each other Couples who eventually marry after the child’s birth
C. Judicial Change of Name Rules of Court, Rule 103; Civil Code Art. 376 Regional Trial Court (RTC) Where R.A. 9255 inapplicable (e.g., paternity disputed, father dead/unavailable)
D. Declaration of Filiation Rule 8, A.M. 03-02-05 (Rule on Custody of Minors) & Art. 172, Family Code RTC (family court) Where father refuses to sign, requiring a DNA-based filiation action

3. Pathway A: Using R.A. 9255 (the “AUSF” route)

3.1 Statutory core

  • Section 1: An illegitimate child whose father has acknowledged paternity “may use the surname of the father.”
  • Section 4: Accomplished through an “Affidavit to Use the Surname of the Father” executed jointly by the mother and the father (or by the child if 18 +).
  • Section 5: The change does not affect legitimacy; sole parental authority remains with the mother unless a court orders otherwise.

3.2 Requirements at the LCR

Scenario Who must execute the AUSF Extra documents
Child below 7 Mother (in the AUSF) + Father’s signature of acknowledgement PSA birth certificate (BC), father’s public instrument of acknowledgement*
Child 7 – 17 Mother + Father + child’s written consent (on AUSF Form 2) Same as above
Child 18 + Child alone (AUSF Form 3) BC, father’s acknowledgement

*Examples of a “public instrument” (Art. 172, Family Code): – Father’s signature on the original birth record (Box 13 of the CRS Form 102) – A notarised “Affidavit of Acknowledgment/Admission of Paternity” – A duly-recorded entry in a protocol book or notarised deed.

3.3 Step-by-step

  1. Secure PSA-certified BC of the child (reflecting the mother’s surname).
  2. Prepare and sign AUSF (downloadable LCR form).
  3. Attach IDs of signatories, marriage certificate if the mother is now married to someone else, and father’s public document of acknowledgement if the birth record shows no father.
  4. File with the LCR of the place of birth (or current residence if birth LCR is inaccessible).
  5. Pay fees (₱3-₱4 k typical; varies by city/municipality).
  6. LCR transmits annotated record to the PSA. Processing 2–5 months; rush options available.

When PSA issues the annotated certificate, the surname on all future PSA copies will appear as: Child’s given name Mother-maiden-surname Father’s-surname.


4. Pathway B: Legitimation

  • Who qualifies: (a) Parents could have married at the time of birth but failed to do so (not bigamous, void, or incest cases); or (b) under R.A. 9858, parents’ marriage was void only because of absence of a licence (or other Art. 35(2) grounds) yet they cohabit.
  • Effect: Child becomes legitimate; surname automatically changes to father’s without need for AUSF; both parents share parental authority.
  • Procedure: After the marriage is registered, parents file a “Joint Affidavit of Legitimation” + BC with the LCR. PSA issues a new BC annotated “legitimated by virtue of subsequent marriage.”

5. Pathway C: Judicial Change of Name (Rule 103)

Used when R.A. 9255 cannot operate—e.g., father is dead, insane, or unlocatable; mother refuses to cooperate; paternity is contested; or child also wants to change the given or middle name.

Key points

  1. Verified petition filed in the RTC of the province where petitioner resides.
  2. Publication in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for three consecutive weeks.
  3. Opposition may be filed by the Solicitor General or any interested party.
  4. If granted, the court order is registered with the LCR, which transmits to PSA for annotation.

6. Pathway D: Action to Establish Filiation

When the man denies paternity, the child (through the mother) may sue under Art. 172 & 175 of the Family Code to prove filiation within the child’s lifetime. DNA testing has been repeatedly recognised as “the most accurate” evidence (e.g., Tijing v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 125901, 08 Mar 2001). Once filiation is judicially confirmed, the court may direct the LCR to annotate the father’s surname on the birth record.


7. Common practical questions

Question Answer (Philippine law)
Does taking the father’s surname make the child legitimate? No. R.A. 9255 changes only the surname, not the status. Legitimation (Pathway B) or adoption is still required to change status.
Can the father later “take back” the surname? He cannot unilaterally revoke the acknowledgment; however, a child on reaching 18 may execute a new AUSF to revert to the mother’s surname.
What about the middle name? For illegitimate children, middle name is optional but, in practice, PSA prints the mother’s maiden surname in the middle-name field once the father’s surname is adopted.
Is the mother’s consent always required? Yes when the child is a minor under AUSF. If she is absent or refuses without just cause, the father may petition the court under Rule 103.
Parental authority after AUSF? Still mother alone (Art. 176, last paragraph), unless a court awards custody to the father for compelling reasons.
Child older than 7 but mentally challenged? The LCR will usually require a medical certificate and may ask the father to secure a court order waiving the child’s written consent.

8. Relevant jurisprudence (selection)

Case G.R. No. Holding
Domingo v. Court of Appeals 125739 (27 Jan 1999) Even before R.A. 9255, the Court allowed substitution of the father’s surname through Rule 103 when the mother consented.
Grande v. Antonio 206248 (18 Feb 2015) Clarified that R.A. 9255 is remedial—it should be liberally applied to advance the child’s welfare.
Republic v. Cañete 206248 (07 Feb 2017) Emphasised that a father’s private handwritten instrument must be “unmistakably” in his own hand.
Lee v. Court of Appeals 175345 (26 Apr 2017) DNA is admissible and often decisive in filiation actions.
Office of the Civil Registrar v. Tiu 195545 (04 Feb 2020) Distinguished between R.A. 9255 annotation (no publication) and Rule 103 name change (publication mandatory).

9. Timeline and costs snapshot (Metro Manila example, 2025)

Item LCR fee range Processing time
AUSF filing ₱ 2,500 – 3,500 1 day for filing
Endorsement to PSA incl. above 1–2 weeks
PSA release of annotated BC ₱ 365 per copy 2–5 months (rush: 6-8 weeks)
Judicial petition (Rule 103) ₱ 8,000 filing + ₱ 25,000 AABB DNA kit (optional) + lawyer’s fees 6-12 months

(Figures are averages only; provincial fees may be lower.)


10. Practical tips

  1. Check existing records first. If the father’s name already appears on the BC, you need only the AUSF—not another acknowledgment.
  2. Bring original IDs of both parents; LCRs are strict on personal appearance to deter trafficking and fraud.
  3. Keep several PSA copies of both the “old” and the “new” certificate; some schools and banks still ask for the history of corrections.
  4. Update ancillary documents (PhilSys ID, passport, school records) promptly after receiving the new PSA copy to avoid mismatches.

11. Key take-aways

  • R.A. 9255 is the usual, streamlined route—administrative, no court, no publication.
  • The change of surname does not cure illegitimacy; it is fundamentally about identity, not status.
  • The mother’s role and consent are pivotal for minors; fathers cannot compel the LCR without her (save by going to court).
  • When parents later marry, legitimation is simpler than AUSF because it confers legitimacy and the father’s surname in one step.
  • DNA-based suits remain available when paternity is disputed or the father refuses to sign.

Disclaimer – This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Individual facts vary; always consult a Philippine family-law practitioner or the Local Civil Registrar for current, case-specific guidance.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.