Demand Survey Before Neighbor Fence Construction Philippines

Demand Survey Before Neighbor Fence Construction in the Philippines A comprehensive legal note for practitioners, property owners and developers


Abstract

Before a landowner in the Philippines erects a perimeter fence, the adjoining owner may legitimately demand a relocation or boundary survey—informally called a “demand survey.” This article consolidates the statutory framework, jurisprudence, administrative rules, and best-practice workflow governing that demand, and maps the civil, criminal, and regulatory consequences of ignoring it.


1. The Context: Why a “Demand Survey” Matters

  1. Preventing encroachment. A fence is a physical assertion of dominion; once built, demolishing or relocating it is far costlier than verifying the line beforehand.
  2. Permit compliance. A licensed geodetic engineer’s survey is required for the lot plan in every fence/building-permit application.
  3. Avoiding criminal liability. Article 313, Revised Penal Code (RPC) penalizes alteration of boundaries or landmarks.
  4. Maintaining neighbor relations and avoiding a barangay complaint under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law (Chapter VII, LGC 1991).

2. Legal Foundations

Source Key Sections Relevance to Demand Survey
Civil Code Art. 430-432 (ownership & boundaries) • Art. 486 (right to enclose) • Arts. 619-636 (easements) • Arts. 659-667 (party walls) Gives each owner the right to fence within his boundary and to compel contribution to a common fence; creates presumptions when the dividing fence is exactly on the line.
National Building Code (PD 1096) & 2021 IRR §103, §301, Rule VII §202.8(b)(5) A fence, though classified as a “Minor Structure,” still needs a building permit and therefore a geodetic-engineer-signed lot plan.
Philippine Geodetic Engineering Act (RA 8560) §§6-7, 28-29 Only a licensed geodetic engineer (GE) may perform a relocation/boundary survey. A GE’s Relocation Survey Plan is the legally admissible evidence of boundaries.
Local Government Code (RA 7160) & Local Zoning Ordinances Book II Chap. II; specific city/municipal zoning LGUs issue fence permits and can suspend work upon complaint of encroachment.
Revised Penal Code Art. 313 Criminalizes knowing alteration of boundaries or landmarks.
Rules of Court Rule 58 (Preliminary Injunction) Courts routinely issue temporary restraining orders (TROs) halting fence work that encroaches.

3. The Right to Demand a Relocation Survey

3.1 Who may demand?

Any adjoining registered or bona-fide possessor whose title or tax-declared parcel shares a common line with the would-be fence builder.

3.2 Legal basis

  • Civil Code Art. 430: the owner must confine his acts within the limits of his property; otherwise he infringes the neighbor’s right to exclude.
  • Party wall articles (659-667) create a reciprocal duty: if one owner wishes to construct exactly on the line, he must allow the other to verify or to share in the wall at half cost.

3.3 Procedure

Step Action Remarks
1 Written Demand Letter to the builder, requesting a GE-sealed relocation survey before works begin. Cite Art. 430/659 & PD 1096; request a schedule for joint witness of survey.
2 Hire a GE (either jointly, or each party may engage his own). RA 8560 requires a written Authority to Survey executed by the landowner.
3 Conduct Survey & Monument Ground Corners. Builder bears the burden of proof that fence will remain inside his line.
4 Barangay Mediation if builder refuses. File complaint (Katarungang Pambarangay) within 60 days pre-condition to court suit.
5 Court Action & TRO (optional). For urgent cases, seek Rule 58 TRO to stop concrete pouring while case is pending.

Cost-sharing: If the fence will be a party wall on the exact line, Art. 660 entitles the demanding neighbor to reimburse one-half of construction and survey expenses upon joining the wall later.


4. Consequences of Ignoring a Valid Demand

Sphere Violation Sanction
Civil Accion reivindicatoria or accion publiciana to recover encroached strip; damages; removal of works (Art. 450). Fence demolition at owner’s expense plus damages.
Criminal Art. 313 RPC if fence knowingly built past boundary monuments. Arresto menor to prision correccional + fine.
Administrative PD 1096 §207 stop-work order; §215 revocation of permit. LGU may issue notice of violation, impose administrative fines, or deny occupancy permit.

5. Guiding Jurisprudence

Case G.R. No. & Date Lesson
Joven v. Court of Appeals G.R. 139144, Oct 19 2000 Relocation survey by licensed GE held superior to earlier sketch plan; fence ordered removed.
Spouses Abalos v. PNB G.R. 158989, Sept 5 2007 Court may rely on approved relocation survey to settle boundary even if title descriptions overlap.
People v. Malabanan (Alteration of Boundaries) CA-G.R. CR 23652, Apr 29 2004 Conviction affirmed; placing concrete posts 0.40 m into neighbor’s lot constituted Art. 313 offense.
Garcia v. Serrano G.R. 197194, Mar 16 2016 Barangay settlement required before civil suit for encroachment; non-compliance dismisses case.

6. Practical Workflow for Builders

  1. Secure Lot Documents: TCT/Original Certificate or DENR-approved cadastral sketch, tax map.

  2. Engage a GE: Draft Authority to Survey, pay survey fee, accompany GE to secure reference points from DENR CENRO/PENRO.

  3. Conduct Relocation Survey: GE sets monuments, prepares Relocation Survey Plan & Technical Description.

  4. Apply for Fence Permit at Office of the Building Official (OBO):

    • Requirements:

      • Duly accomplished Building Permit Form.
      • GE-signed Lot Plan & Certified Blue Print (3 sets).
      • Three-page Fence Plans & Details signed by a civil/structural engineer.
      • Photocopy of TCT / Deed of Sale / Tax Declaration.
      • Barangay clearance.
  5. Serve Neighbor with Survey Results; offer co-ownership of a party wall if fence sits exactly on line.

  6. Construct Fence strictly within surveyed line, observing local height limits (typ. 2.0 m front, 2.5 m side/back, check zoning) & setbacks for corner lots.


7. Party Walls & Shared Fences

  • Presumption of co-ownership (Art. 661) exists if the fence is precisely on the boundary and bears common marks (e.g., central coping).
  • Either owner may insert beams but must not weaken the wall (Art. 665).
  • If only one owner built the wall inside his line, the neighbor has no right to use it without paying one-half of the cost plus value of land beneath (Art. 662).

8. Dispute-Resolution Ladder

  1. Dialogue & Joint Survey
  2. Barangay Mediation (LGC §399-422) – mandatory for neighbors in same city/municipality.
  3. Civil Action (e.g., accion reivindicatoria, injunction, or quieting of title).
  4. Criminal Complaint (for Art. 313) – when intentional boundary alteration can be shown.
  5. Administrative Appeal to DPWH/OBO for permit violations.

9. Drafting a Persuasive Demand Letter

  • State ownership basis (TCT No. ____).
  • Identify adjoining lot & intended fence line.
  • Invoke Civil Code Arts. 430, 659-660; PD 1096.
  • Demand: “Conduct a relocation survey by a duly licensed GE with us present on or before (date); otherwise we shall seek barangay mediation and appropriate legal relief.”
  • Offer to share costs if fence will be a party wall.

Attach photocopies of title page, tax map, and a blank Joint Undertaking for Relocation Survey form for goodwill.


10. Compliance Checklist (One-Page Reference)

  • Title or approved cadastral map on hand
  • Signed Authority to Survey (GE)
  • Monuments set & Relocation Plan printed
  • Neighbor furnished with survey copy
  • Fence/Bldg Permit issued (OBO)
  • Barangay clearances secured
  • Work within height limits & setbacks
  • Photograph each stage for evidence

11. Conclusion

Under Philippine law a landowner may not lawfully ignore a neighbor’s demand for a relocation survey prior to fencing. The right flows from the Civil Code, is operationalized by the Building Code, and is enforced administratively, civilly, and even criminally. From a practical standpoint, a ₱15-₱30 k survey and a few weeks of coordination cost far less than the demolition, damages, and ill-will that follow an ill-placed wall. Always measure twice, build once—preferably with the neighbor watching the tape.


This article is informational and not a substitute for specific legal advice. Consult a Philippine lawyer or licensed geodetic engineer for particular cases.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.