Employee Rights on Company Relocation

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations may change over time, and their application can vary based on the specific facts and circumstances involved. For authoritative guidance and advice, consult a licensed attorney in the Philippines.


Overview

In the Philippines, company relocations happen for various reasons—financial viability, expansion, consolidation of business operations, or strategic realignments. When a company relocates, employees’ rights and employers’ prerogatives intersect under Philippine labor laws. While management retains the right to control and direct company operations (including determining where business is conducted), employees are also protected by the Labor Code of the Philippines and related regulations. This article discusses the key legal principles, jurisprudence, and administrative regulations affecting employees’ rights when a company decides to relocate its place of business.


Relevant Legal Foundations

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442)

    • Although the Labor Code does not explicitly define detailed guidelines about “company relocation,” its general provisions on security of tenure, fair labor practices, and employer-employee relationships guide situations involving transfer of location.
    • Notably:
      • Management Prerogative: Employers have the right to transfer employees, reorganize the workplace, or relocate operations, provided such decisions are made in good faith and with due regard to employees’ rights.
      • Security of Tenure: Employees cannot be dismissed without a valid or authorized cause. A mere relocation of the business does not necessarily constitute a valid ground to terminate employment if positions remain available (albeit in a new location).
      • Constructive Dismissal: If the relocation or transfer is implemented in a way that is unreasonable, malicious, or effectively forces an employee to resign, it can be deemed a form of constructive dismissal under Philippine labor law.
  2. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Guidance

    • The DOLE regularly issues department orders and advisories that interpret and supplement the Labor Code. While there may not be a single issuance devoted exclusively to “company relocations,” the following may be relevant:
      • Department Order on Job Contracting/Subcontracting: If a relocation involves outsourcing or contracting out work, certain requirements must be observed to protect employees from precarious working arrangements.
      • Notices and Consultation: DOLE encourages open communication and consultation with employees or their representatives (if unionized) regarding major operational changes, such as relocation, to ensure fair negotiation and understanding of terms.
  3. Supreme Court Jurisprudence

    • Over the years, Supreme Court decisions have shaped the boundaries of management prerogative and employees’ rights:
      • Good Faith and Reasonableness: The employer’s power to transfer or relocate employees is generally respected unless it is exercised in bad faith, or in a manner that is unduly harsh, oppressive, or contrary to morals.
      • Conditions of Employment: If relocation entails a drastic change in the nature of work or terms of employment (e.g., significantly higher transportation costs, significant changes in shift schedules), courts may look into whether these changes are fair or if they amount to constructive dismissal.
      • Burden of Proof: In claims of constructive dismissal or illegal dismissal on account of relocation, employees typically bear the burden of proving that the employer’s action was not justified or was malicious. On the other hand, employers must show that relocation was based on valid business considerations and employees were given fair options.

Key Employee Rights in Company Relocation

  1. Right to Security of Tenure

    • Employees have a right to remain employed if their positions continue to exist in the new location. The employer cannot simply use “company relocation” as a blanket reason to terminate staff unless the business is closing or reducing personnel in compliance with the authorized causes under the Labor Code.
  2. Right Against Unreasonable Transfer or Constructive Dismissal

    • If an employer’s transfer policy or relocation plan essentially forces employees to resign—by making it unreasonably difficult or impossible to continue working—this may be deemed constructive dismissal. For instance:
      • The new work location is extremely far without adequate support or adjustments;
      • The relocation is conducted in bad faith or with discriminatory intent (e.g., singling out certain employees).
  3. Right to Due Process

    • Employers must inform employees of the relocation in a timely manner. Where the change in location fundamentally impacts the terms and conditions of employment, the employer should consult with affected employees or their representatives (union, if applicable).
    • Any termination (if it is a result of partial closure or retrenchment) must follow the notice requirements to both DOLE and the employee (at least 30 days prior).
  4. Right to Receive Relevant Benefits or Compensation

    • If relocation is optional or if commuting is demonstrably more burdensome, employers may voluntarily offer relocation allowances or adjust benefits—though this is not strictly mandated by law unless prescribed by a collective bargaining agreement or existing company policy.
    • If the relocation is part of a retrenchment or closure (authorized cause), employees may have the right to separation pay, subject to the terms specified under the Labor Code.
  5. Right to Collectively Bargain (If Unionized)

    • In unionized workplaces, the labor union can negotiate or question the relocation plan if it significantly affects working conditions. The union may request either a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or a supplemental contract covering relocation allowances, benefits, and other support measures.

Employer Prerogatives and Obligations

  1. Prerogative to Determine Workplace Location

    • Employers have the right to decide the location of operations in pursuit of legitimate business interests (e.g., proximity to suppliers, cost-cutting, strategic expansion).
    • This prerogative is recognized by the Labor Code and supported by jurisprudence, provided it is exercised in good faith.
  2. Obligation of Good Faith in Implementation

    • Relocation or transfer cannot be used as a tool for harassment, discrimination, or forcing employees to resign.
    • An employer must articulate a valid business rationale. If challenged in court, the employer must show that the relocation is a real necessity and not a subterfuge for illegal dismissal.
  3. Duty to Give Prior Notice

    • DOLE regulations require adequate notice and, when appropriate, consultation with affected employees. In cases of partial closure or retrenchment tied to relocation, the employer must follow the 30-day notice rule to both the employees and the DOLE.
  4. Compliance with Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs)

    • If there is a CBA in place, the employer must comply with the provisions related to transfer of location or assignment. Many CBAs contain clauses regulating transfers and relocations, including compensation and employee preferences.

Practical Considerations for Employees

  1. Assess the Terms of the Relocation

    • Employees should carefully evaluate any new arrangements, including:
      • Potential travel or commuting allowances;
      • Changes in shift schedules;
      • Adjustments in pay or other benefits.
  2. Review Company Policies or CBAs

    • Employees should check whether there are existing company policies or negotiated clauses (in CBAs) that specify benefits or protocols for relocation.
  3. Engage in Dialogue or Negotiation

    • If employees believe the relocation arrangement is excessively burdensome, they can raise their concerns with management or through a union representative.
    • A solution may involve alternative working arrangements (e.g., flexible schedules, partial remote work) or additional support.
  4. Seek Legal Advice When Necessary

    • If employees suspect unfair treatment or constructive dismissal, it is advisable to consult with a labor lawyer or the regional DOLE office.

Conclusion

Under Philippine labor law, an employer’s right to relocate its operations coexists with employees’ rights to security of tenure, fair and humane treatment, and due process. While management has broad discretion to operate the business in the location it sees fit, this prerogative is not absolute. It must be exercised in good faith and in compliance with legal procedures. Employees who believe a relocation is used to force them out of employment or significantly undermine their working conditions may pursue legal remedies, including claims of constructive dismissal. Conversely, a transparent relocation plan—implemented with legitimate business goals, fair notice, consultation, and, where appropriate, additional support—can help both parties adapt to the changes and minimize disputes.

For specific inquiries or cases involving company relocation, employees and employers should seek professional legal counsel or consult DOLE for proper guidance and resolution.


Disclaimer: The information provided here is intended only for general understanding and may not be applicable to every individual situation. For personalized legal advice regarding employee rights and company relocation in the Philippines, consult a qualified lawyer or contact the nearest DOLE office.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.