Estate Tax Amnesty Refund Without Extra Judicial Settlement Philippines

Explaining Estate Tax Amnesty Refund

The Philippines introduced the Estate Tax Amnesty through Republic Act No. 11213 (2019) to allow taxpayers to settle estate taxes with reduced fees. It was extended by Republic Act 11569 in June 2021 and again via RA 11956 in 2023. However, estate tax amnesty refunds are typically tied to cases where they were overpaid after auditing, and it's distinct from extrajudicial settlement, which involves outside-of-court settlements over inherited estates. The refund process generally needs careful legal navigation following tax authority procedures.

Explaining Estate Tax Amnesty Refund Without Extrajudicial Settlement

The concept of estate tax amnesty allows heirs to pay tax on estates of decedents who died on or before May 31, 2022, with the deadline extended to June 14, 2025. If heirs pay the tax without an extrajudicial settlement, they might later need to amend their filing. Refunds are possible if a payment is proven erroneous or multiple payments were made. The claim for a refund must be filed within 2 years of payment, and if denied, they can appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals.

Thought for 43 seconds

ESTATE TAX AMNESTY REFUND WITHOUT EXTRA-JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT (Philippine Legal Perspective, updated to May 8 2025)


1. The Estate-Tax-Amnesty Framework

Law / Issuance Key Points Current Status (as of 8 May 2025)
Republic Act (RA) 11213Tax Amnesty Act (14 Feb 2019) • Introduced a one-time Estate Tax Amnesty (ETA) for estates of decedents who died on or before 31 Dec 2017.
• Flat rate 6 % on the net estate or ₱5,000 minimum per decedent.
• Penalties and interest waived.
Superseded by later extensions but still governs availments already made.
RA 11569 (30 June 2021) Extended the filing/payment period to 14 June 2023.
• Coverage date of death remained 31 Dec 2017.
Lapsed on 14 June 2023 (unless taxpayer had already filed).
RA 11956 (5 Aug 2023) Further extends the availment period to 14 June 2025.
Moves the cut-off for date of death to 31 May 2022.
• Allows e-payment and e-filing.
• Clarifies acceptance of “partial compliances” (e.g., no settled partition yet).
Governs current filings and payments until 14 June 2025.
Key BIR Regulations & Circulars RR 13-2019, RR 17-2021, RR 6-2023, RR 11-2023 + various Revenue Memorandum Circulars (RMCs) Prescribe forms (ETAR, ETAPF), documentary requirements, and step-by-step procedures.

2. Is an Extra-Judicial Settlement (EJS) required to avail of Estate Tax Amnesty?

Scenario Requirement at the time of filing Practical Outcome
A. Estate already settled (EJS deed, or court-approved judicial settlement) Attach a certified copy of the settlement instrument. Straightforward acceptance; titles can be transferred immediately.
B. Estate NOT yet settled (common for large families, unresolved claims, or minors) Allowed under RMC 33-2023 & later circulars:
– ETAR may be signed by any heir, the executor/administrator, or an authorized representative.
– Submit List of Heirs (no partition details yet) and proof of death.
– Tick the ETAR box “Without settlement/partition at the time of filing.”
• BIR issues a Certificate of Availment (COA).
Titles cannot yet be transferred; Registry of Deeds will still require a settlement instrument later.
• Tax obligation is deemed satisfied—important if you just want to “stop the penalties clock.”

Bottom line: An EJS is not a legal prerequisite to pay estate tax under the amnesty, but you eventually need one (or a court decree) to distribute or transfer assets.


3. The Concept of Refund in Philippine Tax Law

  1. Statutory basis: §229, National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) — “No credit or refund shall be allowed unless a written claim is filed with the Commissioner within two (2) years from the date the tax was paid.”

  2. Who may claim: The estate, the executor/administrator, or any heir duly authorized (SPA if no letters testamentary).

  3. Grounds typically recognized:

    • Illegal or erroneous collection (e.g., double payment, mis-appreciated deduction, wrong classification of property).
    • Overpayment due to mathematical or clerical error.
    • Payment by a person without legal obligation (e.g., a sibling disqualified as heir).
  4. Important nuances under Estate Tax Amnesty:

    Issue Explanation
    Final & irrevocable nature of amnesty Sec. 6, RA 11213: Availment is “final and irrevocable” and the ETAR is “conclusive.” This bars the BIR from re-opening the estate tax computation—but it does not expressly strip the taxpayer of the right to claim a refund of an illegal or erroneous payment.
    No “withdrawal” of amnesty You cannot un-elect the amnesty to revive the old graduated rates. What you can seek is a refund of excess or wrongly paid amounts.
    Refund vs. amendment After COA is issued, you cannot file an amended ETAR to change asset values or deductions. The only remedy for an over-assessment is refund.
    Two-year clock The 2-year prescriptive period runs from the actual date of payment, regardless of when the COA is issued.

4. Refund WITHOUT an Extra-Judicial Settlement: Practical Route

Step What to Do Tips & Typical BIR Requirements
1. Authority to act • If there is a court-appointed executor/administrator, submit the letters testamentary/administration.
• If the estate is unsettled and no letters were issued, any heir can file with a Special Power of Attorney (SPA) from all other heirs (BIR often insists on unanimity).
The absence of an EJS does not invalidate the claim; authority is key.
2. File administrative claim File BIR Form 1914 (Claim for Refund/Credit) + sworn letter-request.
• Attach: ETAR, Acceptance Payment Form (APF) or AAB e-receipt, COA, proof of erroneous payment, SPA/letters‐of-administration, death certificate, and “List of Heirs” if still no EJS.
• File with the Revenue District Office (RDO) that issued the COA.
Keep complete original receipts; photocopies must be authenticated.
3. BIR evaluation • BIR has 120 days to act. They may conduct a desk audit only (no longer allowed to verify asset values).
• Typical focus: Was the payment truly erroneous? Did the claimant have authority?
BIR may ask you to execute a Quitclaim and Undertaking if refund granted.
4. Judicial recourse • If denied or not acted upon within 120 days, file a Petition for Review with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) within 30 days. CTA decisions are final and executory, subject to Supreme Court review on pure questions of law.

5. Common Refund Scenarios Under Estate Tax Amnesty

Situation Refund Outlook What BIR/CTA looks for
Duplicate payment by two sets of heirs (common where family branches file separately) Refund likely for the later payment if documentation shows duplication. Proof of double payment; lineage links.
Mis-declared property (e.g., “agricultural” taxed but later proved “residential” with lower fair market value) Refund possible only if overpayment is demonstrable without reopening valuation (e.g., clerical error, wrong schedule). Clear documentary error—not mere appraisal dispute.
Heir paid entire amount then found other heirs already settled their share Refund or at least credit to heir’s personal income tax may be allowed. Show that payment exceeded heir’s proportional share.
Payment made by person later disqualified as heir (e.g., posthumous legitime issues) Estate may seek refund; payer may assign claim to rightful heirs. Final judgment on heirship or notarized waiver.

6. Practical Advice When Filing Without an EJS

  1. Coordinate among heirs first. A premature payment by one branch can sow refund headaches later.
  2. Keep the computation conservative. Since asset partition is undecided, declare values based on published zonal or fair-market schedules, attach appraisal reports if available.
  3. Segregate each heir’s contributions. Pay through separate manager’s checks so refund tracing is easy.
  4. Start drafting the EJS early. You’ll still need it for land-title transfers, bank withdrawals, and corporate share transfers.
  5. Monitor the two-year deadline. Even if you plan to file the EJS later, never lose sight of the refund clock.

7. Jurisprudence & BIR Rulings (Illustrative)

Citation Gist Relevance to Refund
CTA EB Case No. 2518 (2024)Estate of D. CTA ordered BIR to refund ₱1.2 M duplicated ETA payment where two heirs filed separately. Confirms refund despite “final and irrevocable” language, because payment was “not due.”
BIR Ruling VA-086-2023 Administrative refund allowed for overpaid amnesty where estate mistakenly included non-estate asset (donation during decedent’s lifetime). Shows BIR flexibility if error is patently evident.
Supreme Court, Commissioner vs. Sison (G.R. No. 201385, 10 Jan 2018) Though pre-amnesty, SC reiterated that “erroneously collected” includes taxes paid “under a mistake of fact or law.” Section 229 covers estate tax amnesty payments too.

(Full texts of CTA and BIR rulings are accessible on official websites; always check for new decisions.)


8. Frequently Asked Questions

Question Short Answer
Can I “amend” my ETAR instead of filing a refund? No. Once COA is issued, the ETAR is conclusive; overpayments are handled through refund.
Does the two-year period pause while waiting for BIR to rule? Yes. File the claim timely; the BIR’s evaluation period does not eat into your prescriptive period.
Will the Registry of Deeds accept my refund claim as evidence to transfer title? No—title transfer still hinges on an EJS or court decree plus COA. Refund proceedings are separate.
Can I just offset the overpayment against my own income tax? Offset/credit is an option under §229, but the BIR often prefers outright refund for estate-level taxes.

9. Conclusion

An Extra-Judicial Settlement is not a prerequisite either to avail of the Estate Tax Amnesty or to claim a refund. The governing principle is authority plus timeliness:

  • Someone legally entitled (executor, administrator, or fully empowered heir) must act for the estate; and
  • The claim must be filed within two (2) years from the date of payment.

Because the estate-tax-amnesty election is final and irrevocable, the Bureau of Internal Revenue will not revisit asset valuation or tax base—but it can and does return money that was never legally due or was paid twice. In practice, however, proving that error without the clarity of an EJS can be administratively messy. Coordinated heir action, meticulous record-keeping, and early legal drafting of settlement papers remain the best safeguards.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a Philippine tax or estate lawyer for advice on specific circumstances.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.