Filing a Restraining Order Against Harassing Credit Collectors

In the Philippines, while debt is a civil obligation, the methods used to collect it are strictly regulated. Debtors are protected against harassment, intimidation, and unfair collection practices under various laws and circulars issued by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).


1. Legal Basis for Protection

When credit collectors cross the line from professional follow-ups to harassment, several legal frameworks provide a basis for filing for protection or seeking a restraining order:

  • SEC Memorandum Circular No. 18 (Series of 2019): Specifically prohibits "Unfair Debt Collection Practices" by financing and lending companies.
  • BSP Circular No. 454: Sets the standards for banks and their subsidiary credit card companies regarding ethical collection.
  • Republic Act No. 10173 (Data Privacy Act of 2012): Relevant if collectors disclose the debt to third parties or post about it on social media.
  • Revised Penal Code: Provides grounds for criminal charges such as Grave or Light Coercion, Unjust Vexation, and Grave Threats.

2. Defining "Harassing" Conduct

Before seeking a court intervention, the conduct must meet the legal threshold of harassment. Prohibited acts include:

  • Threats of Violence: Using or threatening physical harm against the debtor, their family, or their property.
  • Obscene Language: Using profane or abusive language to insult the debtor.
  • Public Disclosure: Publishing the names of debtors or contacting the debtor's workplace and neighbors to "shame" them.
  • False Representation: Claiming to be a lawyer, police officer, or government official, or sending documents that look like official court summons when they are not.
  • Unreasonable Hours: Calling or visiting between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM, unless the debtor has given prior consent.

3. The Remedy: Petition for Injunction

In the Philippine legal system, what is commonly referred to as a "restraining order" for harassment is technically a Petition for Injunction with a prayer for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and/or a Writ of Preliminary Injunction.

The Process

  1. Preparation of the Petition: The debtor (Petitioner) files a formal complaint in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) alleging that the collector (Respondent) is violating their rights to peace and privacy.
  2. The Prayer for TRO: Because regular court cases take time, the petitioner asks for an immediate 72-hour TRO or a 20-day TRO to stop the harassment while the main case is being heard.
  3. The Hearing: The court will hold a summary hearing to determine if there is an "urgent and paramount necessity" to stop the collector's actions to prevent "grave and irreparable injury" to the debtor.

4. Administrative Remedies (The Alternative)

Often, a court-issued restraining order is the most expensive route. Debtors frequently find relief through administrative complaints:

  • SEC Enforcement and Investor Protection Department: For harassment by lending apps or financing companies. The SEC has the power to revoke the licenses of companies found guilty of unfair collection.
  • BSP Consumer Protection Department: For issues involving banks and credit card issuers.
  • National Privacy Commission (NPC): If the collector used personal data (like contact lists from a phone) without consent to harass third parties.

5. Evidence Gathering

To succeed in filing for a restraining order or a complaint, documentation is critical:

  • Call Logs and Recordings: Timestamps of frequent or late-night calls.
  • Screenshots: Copies of threatening SMS messages, emails, or social media posts.
  • Affidavits: Sworn statements from witnesses (colleagues or neighbors) who were contacted by the collector.
  • Demand Letters: Copies of any written communication sent to the collection agency demanding they cease the harassment.

6. Important Caveat

It is vital to understand that a Restraining Order does not extinguish the debt. Even if a court orders a collector to stop calling or visiting, the underlying civil obligation to pay the money owed remains. The injunction only regulates the manner in which the creditor can pursue the collection. Creditors retain the right to file a proper civil case for "Sum of Money" in court.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.