Filing RA 9262 Cases for Physical Abuse and Child Non-Support

Filing RA 9262 Cases for Physical Abuse and Child Non‑Support

(Philippine Legal Context – July 2025)


Table of Contents

  1. Statutory Framework
  2. Key Definitions
  3. Elements of the Offense
  4. Jurisdiction & Venue
  5. Who May File, and When
  6. Evidence & Documentation
  7. Step‑by‑Step Filing Workflow
  8. Protective Orders (BPO, TPO, PPO)
  9. Support Orders & Enforcement
  10. Penalties & Ancillary Liability
  11. Civil, Administrative & International Remedies
  12. Interaction with Other Philippine Laws
  13. Notable Supreme Court & CA Decisions
  14. Defenses & Common Pitfalls
  15. Practical Tips for Survivors & Counsel
  16. Frequently Asked Questions
  17. Sample Forms & Clauses (Outline Only)
  18. Final Takeaways & Ethical Reminders

1. Statutory Framework

Law Full Title Salient Coverage
Republic Act No. 9262 (2004) “Anti‑Violence Against Women and Their Children Act” Criminalizes physical, sexual, psychological and economic violence committed by a person with whom the woman has or had an intimate or familial relationship. Creates special protective orders and authorizes support awards.
IRR of RA 9262 (2004) Implementing Rules & Regulations Details procedural requirements, forms, and duties of barangays, PNP, prosecutors, courts, DSWD & LGUs.
Supreme Court A.M. No. 04‑10‑11‑SC (Rules on RA 9262, 2004) Special procedural rules: ex parte issuance of TPOs, non‑transfer of venue, evidence guidelines, etc.

2. Key Definitions

Term Statutory Meaning (Sec. 3, RA 9262)
Violence against Women & their Children (VAWC) Any act or series of acts that results in or is likely to result in physical, sexual, psychological harm or economic abuse, including threats, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
Physical Violence Acts that include bodily or life‑threatening harm (e.g., hitting, strangling) or administration of harmful substances.
Economic Abuse Acts that make a woman or child financially dependent, e.g., non‑provision of financial support legally due, or withholding access to the family income or assets.
Children Legitimate, illegitimate, adopted, step‑children or fostered, below 18 yrs old or over 18 but incapacitated. The crime is committed even if the violence is directed only at the child.

3. Elements of the Offense

To secure a conviction for physical abuse or child non‑support under RA 9262, the prosecution must establish:

  1. Relationship

    • Accused has or had a marital, sexual, dating, common‑law, or parental relationship with the woman or child.
  2. Act or Omission

    • Physical abuse – use of force causing bodily harm.
    • Economic abuse / non‑support – willful failure to provide financial support without justifiable cause despite ability to do so.
  3. Resulting Harm or Likelihood

    • Physical injury, trauma or fear, or deprivation of child’s basic needs.
  4. Venue & Jurisdiction

    • Committed in the Philippines or abroad if either party is a Philippine citizen and harm is felt in the Philippines (extraterritorial clause).

4. Jurisdiction & Venue

Court Jurisdiction Typical Filing Site
Regional Trial Court (RTC) – Family Court Exclusive original jurisdiction over RA 9262 cases. Where the crime or any of its elements occurred, where the complainant resides, or where the child resides.
Municipal/Metropolitan Trial Courts (MTC/MeTC) May issue Barangay Protection Orders when judge is acting as ex‑officio BPO issuer in small municipalities absent of an RTC judge.
Barangay Conciliation NOT required; BPO can be issued by Punong Barangay or Kagawad within 24 hours.

5. Who May File, and When

  1. Victim herself (woman or child).
  2. Parents or guardians of the minor child.
  3. Social workers, police officers, LGU officers, or at least two concerned citizens in the same barangay (Sec. 9).
  4. Embassies/Consulates for OFWs abroad (for support & protection orders).

Prescription: Five (5) years from the last act of violence or discovery of economic abuse (Art. 91, RPC by analogy; no specific period in RA 9262 but jurisprudence treats it as offense punishable by ≤6 years). Continuous crime theory applies to continuing non‑support.


6. Evidence & Documentation

Abuse Type Core Evidence Supplementary Evidence
Physical Medico‑legal certificate; photos of injuries; police blotter; eyewitness testimony. Diary entries, chat/SMS threats, prior BPO/TPO, 911 logs, CCTV.
Economic / Non‑Support School billing statements, medical bills, receipts proving expenses; employment or income records showing accused’s capacity; affidavits of arrears. Bank remittances (or lack thereof), social media admissions, SEC/DTI filings showing business income.

Rule on Evidence: Liberal application (Sec. 26, RA 9262). Hearsay may be admitted in protection‑order hearings if sworn and credible.


7. Step‑by‑Step Filing Workflow

  1. Safety First

    • Seek medical attention; request medico‑legal exam.
    • Move to a safe place or DSWD‑accredited shelter.
  2. Barangay Action

    • File for Barangay Protection Order (BPO) – issued ex parte within 24 h, valid for 15 days.
    • No barangay mediation required (Sec. 32, RA 9262; repeals Lupon conciliation).
  3. Police Blotter & WCPD

    • Sworn statement, photography of injuries, refer to prosecutor.
  4. Filing of Criminal Complaint

    • Office of the City/Provincial Prosecutor: Submit Complaint‑Affidavit + annexes.
    • Inquest if arrest was warrantless; otherwise regular preliminary investigation.
  5. Judicial Protection Orders

    • TPO (Temporary) – RTC issues within 24 h, valid 30 days until PPO hearing.
    • PPO (Permanent) – after summary hearing, valid until revoked.
  6. Arraignment & Trial

    • Within 30 days from filing Info (per Speedy Trial Act).
    • Testimony may be via videoconference (A.M. No. 20‑12‑01‑SC).
  7. Judgment & Sentencing

    • Upon conviction, court may simultaneously (a) impose penalties and (b) order payment of support arrears, damages and cost of counseling.

8. Protective Orders in Detail

Order Authority Validity Reliefs Included
BPO Punong Barangay / Kagawad 15 days Stopping contact; stay‑away radius; firearms surrender.
TPO RTC Family Court (ex parte) 30 days BPO reliefs + temporary custody, removal from home, interim support.
PPO Same RTC after hearing Until revoked All TPO reliefs + permanent child custody, possession of vehicle, award of attorney’s fees, psych evaluation orders.

Violation of any protection order is a distinct crime punishable by ≥30 days but ≤6 months &/or fine ₱5,000–₱50,000.


9. Support Orders & Enforcement

  • Sec. 8(d), RA 9262: Court may direct respondent to provide fixed monthly support proportional to means and needs.
  • Rules on Support (A.M. No. 02‑06‑02) apply suppletorily.
  • Income Assignment: Court may garnish salaries, SSS/GSIS benefits, bank deposits.
  • Contempt & Imprisonment: Continued non‑payment despite ability is punishable as indirect contempt + separate RA 9262 count each month support is withheld.

10. Penalties & Ancillary Liability

Act Penalty (imprisonment) Fine Additional
Physical injuries Arresto Mayor to Reclusión Temporal (30 days – 20 yrs) depending on gravity, plus RA 9262 medium penalty added one degree (Sec. 6). ₱100,000 – ₱300,000 Mandatory psychological counseling for offender.
Economic abuse / non‑support Prisión Correccional min (6 mo & 1 day – 2 yrs & 4 mo) to max (4 yrs & 2 mo – 6 yrs). Same Continuous offense; each willful month of non‑support = separate count.
Violation of PO Arresto Mayor (30 days – 6 mo) ₱5,000 – ₱50,000 No probation.

Civil damages (actual, moral, exemplary) may be awarded. Victim is also entitled to restitution for medical & counseling expenses.


11. Civil, Administrative & International Remedies

  • Annulment / Legal Separation on ground of VAWC.
  • Custody Petitions under A.M. No. 03‑04‑04‑SC.
  • POEA & DFA intervention for OFW spouses for support and repatriation.
  • Interpol red notice (through DOJ‑NBI) for absconding respondents.

12. Interaction with Other Philippine Laws

Related Law Overlap / Distinction
RPC Arts. 333‑365 (physical injuries, abandonment) RA 9262 is special law: conviction under RA 9262 bars double jeopardy for same acts.
RA 8533 / RA 10364 (Trafficking) Violence facilitating trafficking may be charged separately.
RA 9710 (Magna Carta of Women) Provides administrative sanctions vs. police/barangay officials who refuse assistance.
RA 7610 (Child Abuse) If victim is child only, prosecutor may charge under both RA 7610 & RA 9262 (People v. Lacsamana, CA 2015).
RA 11596 (Child Marriage Prohibition) Early marriage plus abuse may compound penalties.

13. Notable Supreme Court & CA Decisions

Case G.R. No. Ruling
Garcia v. Drilon (2013) 179267 Upheld constitutionality of RA 9262; equal‑protection objections rejected because women & children suffer disproportionate domestic violence.
People v. Cabalquinto (2016) 218246 Reiterated that actual cohabitation not required; long‑distance relationship falls within “dating relationship.”
AAA v. BBB (2015) 212448 Economic abuse proven by bank statements; each month of non‑support is a distinct offense – no violation of double jeopardy to file multiple Informations.
People v. G.R. (CA 2022) CA‑G.R. CR‑HC 12078 First appellate conviction using video‑link testimony of minor per A.M. 20‑12‑01; affirmed validity.

14. Defenses & Common Pitfalls

  • Good‑Faith Defense – rare; must show complete inability to give support despite diligent effort (e.g., catastrophic illness). Mere job loss is insufficient if assets exist.
  • Retaliatory Complaint Allegation – prosecution must still prove elements; credibility bolstered by contemporaneous records (medical, barangay blotters).
  • Delay in Reporting – courts recognize battered‑woman syndrome; delay does not negate credibility (Sec. 26).
  • Compromise & Desistance – RA 9262 offenses are public crimes; desistance does not extinguish criminal liability (People v. Motus, 2019).

15. Practical Tips for Survivors & Counsel

  1. Document immediately – keep a “violence diary,” screenshots, duplicate cloud backups.
  2. Medical exam within 24 h maximizes evidentiary value.
  3. Coordinate with WCPD – they are trained; insist on police photographer & referral to social worker.
  4. Secure bankable identifiers – TIN, SSS, plate numbers; aids in asset tracing for support.
  5. Consider simultaneous civil action for damages; SC Admin Matter allows consolidation with criminal case for expediency.
  6. For OFW respondents – ask court to issue Hold Departure Order and order DFA to cancel passport under Sec. 15, RA 9262 IRR.

16. Frequently Asked Questions

Question Short Answer
Can men file RA 9262? No. Only women and their children are covered; however, violence against men may be charged under RPC.
Is conciliation mandatory? No. Barangay conciliation is waived; victim may directly file.
What if respondent is abroad? File in RTC where victim resides; DOJ may prosecute in absentia; protection orders still enforceable.
Can settlement stop the case? No. Even marriage between parties does not extinguish criminal liability.
Is probation allowed? Generally yes (penalty ≤6 yrs), except if the offender violated a protection order.

17. Sample Forms & Clauses (Outline)

  1. Complaint‑Affidavit Skeleton:

    • Parties & Relationship
    • Narration of Facts (chronological)
    • Specific Acts of Physical / Economic Abuse (dates, places, injuries, expenses)
    • Prayer for: issuance of TPO, support of ₱ ____ per month, reimbursement ₱ ____, arrest of respondent.
    • Verification & Certification of Non‑Forum Shopping.
  2. Medical Certificate Request Letter – include victim identifiers & timeline.

  3. Motion for TPO – cite Sec. 15, RA 9262 and attach supporting affidavits.

(For actual practice, always use latest Supreme Court‑approved forms and local family court templates.)


18. Final Takeaways & Ethical Reminders

  • Speed is safety – seek immediate protection and document evidence; RA 9262 favors ex‑parte relief.
  • Holistic relief – the law is not only punitive; it provides support, custody, counseling, and rehabilitation.
  • Non‑support is violence – withholding money for a child’s needs is criminal, not merely a civil matter.
  • No compromise on children’s welfare – even reconciliations cannot waive the child’s right to support.
  • Professional Responsibility – lawyers and barangay officials may face administrative sanctions for neglecting RA 9262 duties (Rule 138, Code of Professional Responsibility, RA 9710).

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes as of July 28 2025. Philippine jurisprudence evolves; always verify with the latest Supreme Court decisions, circulars and local court issuances, or consult qualified counsel.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.