Harassment and Blackmail by Online Lending Companies in the Philippines

Harassment and Blackmail by Online Lending Companies in the Philippines: A Comprehensive Overview

In recent years, online lending platforms have grown in popularity throughout the Philippines. Although many are legitimate and duly registered, some engage in questionable or outright unlawful practices—particularly harassment and blackmail. This article explores the legal context of these abusive collection methods, the responsibilities of lending companies, and the remedies available to borrowers under Philippine law.

1. Introduction

Online lending companies, also commonly referred to as “fintech” or “digital lending” platforms, offer short-term loans with minimal requirements and swift approval processes. While these services may be beneficial for many borrowers—especially those who need urgent cash or who lack ready access to traditional banking—some online lenders have become notorious for:

  1. Excessive or hidden charges and interest rates
  2. Aggressive debt-collection tactics, including repeated calls, threats, and intimidation
  3. Harassment and blackmail, such as public shaming or contacting the borrower’s friends and relatives
  4. Unauthorized use or misuse of personal data in violation of privacy laws

These practices not only burden borrowers with financial and emotional distress but also run afoul of multiple Philippine laws and regulations.

2. Legal Framework Governing Online Lending

2.1. The Revised Penal Code (RPC)

Although the Revised Penal Code (Act No. 3815) does not specifically address online lending, it contains provisions against acts that could constitute harassment or blackmail, such as:

  • Grave Threats or Grave Coercion (Articles 282–286): If a lender threatens physical harm or engages in coercive acts to force the borrower to pay, such may fall under these offenses.
  • Libel or Slander (Articles 353–355, 358): Publicly shaming a borrower via social media or messaging platforms could be interpreted as libelous if it harms the reputation of the borrower and meets other elements of libel.

2.2. The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173)

A recurring complaint against some online lending companies is unauthorized access to, and misuse of, personal data. Often, these applications require broad permissions to access the borrower’s phone contacts or media files. In extreme cases, lenders contact these individuals to pressure or shame the borrower into paying.

  • Consent and Purpose Limitation
    Under the Data Privacy Act, personal data must be collected for a declared, specific, and legitimate purpose. Any additional processing—such as contacting a borrower’s friends or relatives—should have legal basis, such as consent or a legitimate interest under the law.

  • Penalties for Violations
    Non-compliance with the Data Privacy Act could lead to criminal penalties, including imprisonment, and administrative penalties such as fines or suspension of operations by the National Privacy Commission (NPC). Lenders that harass borrowers or disclose personal data without proper legal basis may be subject to complaints before the NPC.

2.3. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulations

The SEC enforces regulations over lending and financing companies to ensure fair practices. Its Memorandum Circulars outline registration requirements and acceptable conduct for both traditional and online lending platforms:

  • Registration and Licensing of Lending Companies
    The SEC requires all lending and financing entities, including online platforms, to register and obtain a Certificate of Authority to Operate. Failure to do so may result in closure or penalties.

  • Prohibition of Unfair Debt Collection Practices
    The SEC has issued several advisories and memoranda warning lending companies against harassment, threats, or the unauthorized use of a borrower’s personal information during debt collection. If a company is found to be violating these rules, the SEC may revoke its license or impose hefty fines.

2.4. Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Regulations

Although many online lending companies are not considered banks, the BSP’s rules on consumer protection can be instructive on fair practices. In particular, BSP Circulars on consumer protection and responsible lending underscore the importance of safeguarding borrowers’ rights and data privacy. Banks and quasi-banks, for example, must adhere to strict guidelines for interest rates, disclosure, and fair debt collection.

3. Common Harassment and Blackmail Tactics

3.1. Threatening Calls or Messages

Some online lenders call borrowers repeatedly at all hours, send threatening text messages, or even resort to using foul language or slurs. These tactics are designed to pressure borrowers into immediate payment.

3.2. Public Shaming on Social Media

Posting about a borrower’s debt on social media groups, sending mass messages to the borrower’s phone contacts, or uploading manipulated images and statements may be considered harassment and potentially libelous under the Revised Penal Code.

3.3. Unauthorized Access to Contacts and Personal Data

One of the most frequent complaints is that lenders, through their mobile apps, gain access to borrowers’ contact lists. They then message friends, relatives, or colleagues, disclosing the borrower’s debt and disparaging them. This practice likely violates the Data Privacy Act if done without a clear and valid legal basis.

3.4. Exorbitant “Penalty” or “Convenience” Fees

Online lenders sometimes impose hidden or unjustifiably high penalties, processing fees, or convenience charges. They then threaten legal action or harassment if borrowers question these amounts. While not strictly blackmail, the manner of collecting such fees may constitute harassment or other illegal acts if done through threats.

4. Legal Consequences for Lending Companies Engaged in Harassment or Blackmail

  1. Criminal Liability

    • Grave Threats, Coercion, Libel, or Other Offenses Under the RPC: If the methods used by the lender clearly violate the provisions on threats, coercion, or libel, criminal charges can be initiated.

  2. Data Privacy Violations

    • Penalties Under the Data Privacy Act: These may include imprisonment or fines if the lender processes personal information illegally. The National Privacy Commission has been proactive in imposing penalties on erring data controllers and processors.

  3. Administrative Penalties by the SEC

    • Revocation of License or Imposition of Fines: The SEC can revoke the Certificate of Authority of lending companies found to have engaged in unfair practices, or impose fines that may run into millions of pesos.

  4. Tortious Liability and Damages in Civil Suits

    • Civil Action for Damages: Borrowers subjected to harassment or blackmail can sue for moral damages, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees if they can prove the damage sustained.

5. Remedies and Steps for Borrowers

  1. Document Everything

    • Keep screenshots or recordings of calls, messages, and posts that show harassment or blackmail. This evidence is crucial if filing a complaint with law enforcement agencies or regulatory bodies.

  2. File a Complaint with the SEC

    • The SEC has an online portal and hotlines for reporting abusive lending practices. Borrowers may submit evidence demonstrating harassment or a violation of SEC rules.

  3. Report to the National Privacy Commission (NPC)

    • If the lender misuses personal information or contacts a borrower’s friends or relatives without valid legal basis, a complaint can be filed with the NPC. The NPC can investigate, issue compliance orders, and impose administrative sanctions.

  4. Seek Assistance from the Philippine National Police (PNP) or National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)

    • In cases of grave threats, public shaming, or cyber-harassment, borrowers may approach the PNP or NBI for help. Specifically, the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group can look into any digital or electronic harassment.

  5. Engage a Lawyer or Legal Aid Organization

    • If resources permit, borrowers should consult a lawyer or reputable legal aid organization. These professionals can guide them through filing the appropriate criminal, civil, or administrative complaints.

  6. Coordinate with Consumer Protection Groups

    • Non-government organizations and consumer advocacy groups may offer advice or even mediation services in disputes with aggressive or abusive lenders.

6. Tips for Avoiding Predatory Lenders

  1. Research the Lending Company

    • Check if the lending company is duly registered with the SEC and has a valid Certificate of Authority.

  2. Read the Terms and Conditions Thoroughly

    • Pay attention to interest rates, fees, and any terms regarding data sharing. Look for an explicit statement on how personal data will be used.

  3. Limit App Permissions

    • Many mobile phones allow users to restrict the permissions granted to apps. If the lending app requests access to more data than necessary, consider this a warning sign.

  4. Consider Alternatives

    • Credit cooperatives, government lending programs, or salary loans from employers might be safer alternatives with clearer terms.

7. Conclusion

The proliferation of online lending platforms in the Philippines has provided a convenient borrowing avenue for many. However, with convenience comes the risk of unscrupulous operators who resort to harassment, blackmail, and other illegal practices. Philippine law provides multiple avenues to protect borrowers’ rights—from the Revised Penal Code’s provisions on threats and libel, to the Data Privacy Act’s strict guidelines on the collection and processing of personal data, and to the SEC’s authority to sanction abusive lenders.

Borrowers facing such harassment should document incidents meticulously and seek recourse through the SEC, the National Privacy Commission, and, where necessary, criminal or civil courts. Greater awareness of these rights and remedies—combined with responsible lending regulations—can help curb the alarming rise in abusive debt-collection practices by online lending companies in the Philippines.

References

  1. Revised Penal Code (Act No. 3815)
  2. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173)
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Memorandum Circulars on Lending and Financing Companies
    • In particular, SEC Memorandum Circular Nos. 18 and 19, Series of 2019 (Registration and Licensing of Online Lending Platforms; Prohibition of Unfair Debt Collection Practices)
  4. BSP Circulars on Consumer Protection (applicable to banks and quasi-banks, but illustrative for fair and ethical lending practices)
  5. National Privacy Commission Issuances and Advisories on data privacy and protection, including the handling of personal data by private entities.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login