Heir by Representation Concept in Philippine Inheritance Law


HEIR BY REPRESENTATION IN PHILIPPINE SUCCESSION LAW

A comprehensive doctrinal and practical guide


1. Statutory Foundation

Source Key Provisions
Civil Code of the Philippines (1950) Arts. 970 – 977 (representation), Art. 960 (causes of succession), Arts. 978 – 1015 (intestate succession framework)
Family Code (1987) Arts. 163 – 172 (legitimation & filiation, relevant to who may represent)
Special Laws & Rules - Child & Youth Welfare Code (Standing of legitimated & adopted children)
- Rules of Court, Rule 73 § 1 (venue/intestate)

Definition (Art. 970): Representation is a right created by fiction of law by which the descendants of a person are called to the succession in the same degree and by the same title as the person represented, if the latter is unable to inherit because of pre-decease, disinheritance, or incapacity.


2. Rationale & Historical Roots

Representation was inherited from the Spanish Código Civil (Arts. 924-933) and preserves the bloodline’s stake in a decedent’s estate. Instead of allowing a branch to be entirely cut off when a compulsory heir is absent, the law “lets the trunk live through its branches.” The concept also prevents unfair enrichment of nearer collaterals and aligns with the Filipino cultural norm that property flows downward to younger generations.


3. Basic Requisites

  1. Existence of a person to be represented – a legitimate/illegitimate child, brother or sister of the decedent.
  2. Legal impediment of that personpre-deceased, disinherited, or incapacitated (Arts. 1032-1039).
  3. Qualified representative – must be a descendant (direct line) or nephew/niece (collateral line) not excluded by incapacity.
  4. Intestate or testamentary gap – representation operates primarily in intestacy, but may also fill voids in a will when there is no effective substitution (Art. 859).

4. Where Representation Operates

Line of Relationship Coverage Notes
Direct Descending Ad infinitum (grandchildren, great-grandchildren…) Always allowed (Art. 971).
Collateral Only in favor of children of brothers or sisters (nephews/nieces) (Art. 975). Never beyond this degree.
Ascending Never (parents cannot represent grandparents). Art. 972.
Illegitimate kin Allowed within their own line after the 2009 Supreme Court ruling in Sagun v. Sagun, GR 179873 (Jan 20 2009). Must contend with Art. 992 “iron curtain” but 2021 case Calderon v. Lentisco relaxed the barrier when both lines are illegitimate.

5. Mechanics of the Fiction

  1. Per Stirpes Calculation – Representatives step into the shoes of the person represented as one branch.
  2. Equal Division Within the Branch – The branch’s share is split equally among representatives per capita.
  3. Legitime Protection – Where the represented was a compulsory heir, the branch receives his legitime (Arts. 888 ff.).
  4. Transmission vs. Representation – Transmission (Art. 774, right passes after the opening of succession) applies when the heir survives the decedent but dies before accepting. Representation applies when the ancestor never became an heir at all.
  5. No Partial Representation – If representation is opened, the entire share of the ascendant is taken; no mix of direct succession and representation in the same person (Art. 973).

6. Civil Code Illustrations

  1. Grandparent → Grandchildren

    • Facts: A dies intestate, survived by B (child) and by C & D (grandchildren of pre-deceased child X).
    • Rule: The estate is divided ½ to B and ½ to branch of X; C & D get ¼ each.
  2. Uncle → Nephews/Nieces

    • Facts: E dies intestate, no ascendants/descendants, but with sisters F (living) and G (pre-deceased, survived by H & I).
    • Rule: Estate split ½ to F, ½ to branch of G; H & I take ¼ each.
  3. Impairment Example

    • Facts: J (legitimate son) is disinherited. J’s two legitimate children K & L inherit.
    • Effect: K & L represent J and together get J’s legitime branch share.

7. Jurisprudential Highlights

Case G.R. / Date Doctrine
Sagun v. Sagun 179873 / 20 Jan 2009 Illegitimate grandchildren may represent their illegitimate parent under Art. 991; clarified that Art. 992 iron curtain bars representation only across legitimate-illegitimate lines.
Heirs of Malate v. Gamboa 170139 / 13 Jun 2012 Confirmed that representation gives branch participation equal to the share of the person represented, even if an unequal number of representatives exist in each branch.
Calderon v. Lentisco 235058 / 15 Feb 2021 Harmonized intestate succession of illegitimates post-Family Code; “iron curtain” in Art. 992 is unconstitutional if both sides are illegitimate.
Manzano v. Perez 138568 / 23 Aug 2001 Distinguished substitution in wills from statutory representation.
Quimiguing v. Icao L-27023 / 29 Nov 1979 Representation does not apply where the represented heir survives but voluntarily renounces; renunciation ≠ incapacity.

8. Interaction with Other Doctrines

Doctrine Interaction
Accretion (Art. 1015) Representation excludes accretion because the branch exists.
Substitution (Arts. 859-865) Testamentary substitution overtakes statutory representation if validly expressed.
Collation & Partition Goods donated to the represented ascendant are deemed brought to collation as if he were alive; affects legitime calculation.
Adoption Legitimate links are created; adopted children may represent and be represented in the adoptive family (§ 32, RA 11642, 2022 Domestic Administrative Adoption Act).

9. Practical Tips for Estate Planners & Litigators

  1. Chart the Family Tree Early – Identify every potential branch; overlooked grand- or great-grandchildren can unravel settlements.
  2. Scrutinize Causes of Incapacity – A judicial declaration of incapacity is essential; voluntary repudiation triggers transmission, not representation.
  3. Watch the Iron Curtain – When legitimate and illegitimate lines intermingle, analyze post-2009 doctrine; be ready to invoke equal-protection objections.
  4. Draft Clear Substitutions – To bypass statutory representation, wills must expressly provide for substitute beneficiaries; ambiguous clauses default to representation.
  5. Use Conditional Renunciations Sparingly – A renouncing heir cannot later “activate” representation; the right is lost for the branch.

10. Sample Computation

Scenario: Estate = ₱12 million. Decedent P leaves: • Legitimate Daughter A (alive) • Legitimate Son B (pre-deceased), survived by legitimate children C, D, E • Legitimate Son - Adopted Child F (alive) • Surviving Spouse W

Step 1 – Identify Compulsory Heirs & Shares (legitime):

  • Spouse W = ¼
  • Legitimate children/branches = ¾, divided per stirpes among A, branch of B, and F.

Step 2 – Compute:

  • Spouse W → ₱3 M
  • Children share → ₱9 M ÷ 3 branches = ₱3 M each
  • Branch of B (representation) → ₱3 M divided per capita = ₱1 M each to C, D, E

11. Frequently Asked Questions

Question Short Answer
Can great-grandchildren represent if grandchildren are alive? Yes. Representation “penetrates ad infinitum,” but only if all intermediate ascendants in that branch are absent or incapacitated.
Does representation require court declaration? No; it is automatic by operation of law, though courts often confirm during settlement.
May an illegitimate grandchild represent a legitimate parent? Traditionally no (Art. 992), but Calderon suggests constitutional challenges may succeed.
What if the represented heir simply waives inheritance? Waiver after the estate opens triggers transmission (branch does not activate).

12. Conclusion

The right of representation is a uniquely equitable device that keeps family property within its natural bloodline while honoring the decedent’s presumed intent. Mastery of its rules—particularly the per stirpes methodology, the strict limits in the collateral line, and the nuanced legitimate/illegitimate interplay—remains indispensable for Philippine estate practitioners. With continuing constitutional scrutiny of Art. 992 and rapid evolution in family structures (e.g., adoption reforms), advisers must stay vigilant; but the core civil-law principle endures: “the branch ascends whenever the trunk has fallen.”


Disclaimer: This article is for academic and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific cases, consult a lawyer admitted to the Philippine Bar.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.