Holiday Pay Deduction for Tardiness Philippines

Holiday Pay Deduction for Tardiness in the Philippines: A Comprehensive Legal Guide


1. Introduction

Holiday pay is one of the core statutory benefits guaranteed to Filipino employees under the Labor Code. Questions often arise when workers report late for duty—may an employer legally deduct the minutes of tardiness from the holiday‐pay benefit, or even withhold it entirely? This article consolidates the law, regulations, policy issuances, and jurisprudence governing that issue and offers practical guidance to HR practitioners, union officers, and employees.


2. Legal Foundations

Source Key Provision
Article 94, Labor Code Grants every covered employee 100 % of the regular daily wage for any regular holiday on which the employee is not required to work.
Book III, Rule IV, §§ 1–8, Implementing Rules Lays down the conditions for entitlement (e.g., present or “on leave with pay” on the workday immediately preceding the holiday).
Article 113, Labor Code Prohibits deductions from wages except those (a) required by law or (b) authorized in writing by the employee or (c) with the imprimatur of the Secretary of Labor.
Article 116, Labor Code Criminalizes “withholding of wages” via devices or subterfuges.
1987 Constitution, Art. XIII, § 3 State policy of full protection to labor, including payment of just wages.

Take-away: Holiday pay is a statutory wage, not a gratuity; any reduction must squarely fit within the exceptions to Articles 113 and 116.


3. Understanding Tardiness vs. Absence

  1. Tardiness – Reporting for work after the prescribed start time but still performing service that day.
  2. Absence – Failure to render work for all scheduled hours that day.

Under DOLE’s long-standing position, “absence” on the work-day immediately before a holiday breaks the chain of entitlement, unless the worker is on “leave with pay.” Tardiness, however, does not bar entitlement because the employee is legally “present.”


4. Can an Employer Deduct Holiday Pay Because of Tardiness?

4.1 Pro Rata Deduction for the Minutes/Hours Late
  • Permissible. The minutes the employee actually did not work on the day he was tardy were not “earned” wages. Art. 113 is not violated because the employer is merely refusing to pay for unworked time, not deducting something already earned.
  • Computation: Daily wage ÷ 8 hours = hourly rate; multiply by minutes/60.
4.2 Total Forfeiture of the Whole Holiday Pay
  • Generally Impermissible. DOLE Opinion No. 11-24-98 and the DOLE Handbook on Workers’ Statutory Monetary Benefits (2024 ed.) both state that an employee who is present, albeit late, on the day preceding a regular holiday retains entitlement to the full 100 % holiday pay.
  • Exception: When a valid collective bargaining agreement (CBA) or a company policy—proved to have been clearly, voluntarily, and knowingly accepted by employees—expressly provides for partial or total forfeiture due to tardiness, courts have occasionally upheld it under the freedom-to-contract principle, provided (i) the policy is reasonable and (ii) it does not diminish benefits already fixed by law (Art. 100, Labor Code).

5. Jurisprudence Snapshot

Case G.R. No. Ratio Decidendi
Colegio de San Juan de Letran-Calamba v. Association of Faculty & Employees 127932, 1 Sept 2010 Employees absent on the day before the holiday without approved leave lost holiday pay. Tardiness was not at issue but dicta affirmed the “presence” test.
Toyota Bicutan Employees Union v. NLRC 110823, 2 July 1999 CBA can refine holiday-pay conditions so long as result is equal or better than statutory benefit.
Cavite Apparel v. Marquez 172044, 15 Aug 2012 Deduction for hours not worked is not an illegal wage deduction under Art. 113.

Trend: The Supreme Court distinguishes between deducting unearned wages (allowed) and penal deductions or forfeiture (presumptively void absent a clear statutory/CBA basis).


6. DOLE Policy Issuances & FAQs

  1. Labor Advisory No. 23-22 (Computation of Wages for Holidays)

    • Reiterates “present or on paid leave” rule.
  2. Policy Instruction No. 40 (Holiday Pay Integration)

    • Clarifies that monthly-paid employees already have holiday pay “rolled into” their salary; deduction for tardiness reduces only the salary segment, not the holiday-pay allocation.
  3. Handbook on Statutory Monetary Benefits (latest edition)

    • Tardiness does not disqualify; only absence does.
  4. Bureau of Working Conditions Advisory Opinions

    • Uniformly state: “Only the actual minutes/hours not worked may be reduced; holiday pay stays intact.”

7. Treatment by Employee Category

Category Holiday Pay Rule Tardiness Impact
Daily-Paid Receives separate 100 % daily wage for regular holidays, provided present day before. Deductible only for minutes late on the workday; holiday pay untouched.
Monthly-Paid Holiday pay deemed included in 12-month salary. Deductions for tardiness affect only the pro-rated daily wage, not the holiday component.
Piece-Rate Entitled to holiday pay equivalent to average daily earnings in last 6 workdays ✧ Minutes late reduce piece earnings if measured by time; holiday pay still due if “present.”
Field/Commission If hours cannot be determined with reasonable certainty, DOLE applies “average earnings” rule. Same “presence” test; deductions difficult unless a time clock or GPS logs exist.

✧ Implementing Rules, Book III, Rule IV, § 7.


8. Special (Non-Working) Days vs. Regular Holidays

  • Special non-working day (“no work, no pay”): Employer may grant pay at 30 % premium if work is performed; otherwise none.
  • Tardiness on the preceding day does not matter because the benefit is voluntary unless company/CBA says otherwise.

9. Statutory & Contractual Limitations on Deduction

  1. Ceiling of Deduction: Only the unearned portion. Imposing administrative penalties through wage withholding is illegal unless (i) amount is to answer for an employer-loss or damage proved under Art. 114 with proper notice and hearing, or (ii) expressly authorized in writing.
  2. Non-Diminution (Art. 100): Once the company has a practice of paying the full holiday pay despite tardiness, it ripens into a benefit and cannot be withdrawn unilaterally.
  3. Due Process: Any deduction scheme must be in the company handbook/CBA, explained to employees, and uniformly enforced to avoid discrimination claims.

10. Best-Practice Checklist for Employers

Action Item
Issue a clear, written policy on tardiness and wage deductions, expressly distinguishing salary vs. holiday pay.
Ensure time-keeping systems (biometrics/logbooks) accurately capture late minutes.
For monthly-paid staff, compute deductions against daily salary equivalent only.
Obtain individual written consent if deductions will go beyond the unearned hours (e.g., disciplinary fines).
Publish reminders before long weekends reiterating the “presence” rule.

11. Practical Examples

  1. Daily-Paid Worker, ₱610 daily rate, 30 minutes late on 30 April; 1 May is Labor Day (regular holiday).

    • Deduction for 30 minutes = ₱610 ÷ 480 × 30 ≈ ₱38.13 from 30 April salary.
    • ₱610 holiday pay for 1 May must still be paid.
  2. Monthly-Paid Worker, ₱20,000/month, 1 hour late on 30 April; company uses 313 divisor.

    • Hourly rate = ₱20,000 ÷ (8 × 313) ≈ ₱7.99. Deduction = ₱7.99 × 60 = ₱479.40 from April wage.
    • No further adjustment needed on 1 May.

12. Frequently Asked Questions

Question Short Answer
Does tardiness on the holiday itself matter? Yes, because work was rendered; employer may deduct minutes late from the 200 % premium owed.
May we offset tardiness with an employee’s unused leave credits instead of deducting pay? Yes, if the leave policy or CBA allows “leave offsetting” and the employee consents.
Is a blanket policy “Three tardies = no holiday pay” valid? Likely invalid unless bargained in a CBA and yielding a benefit package equal or better than law.
How about government employees? Covered by Administrative Code and CSC rules; holiday pay already integrated; deductions for tardiness follow CSC’s 7.5-hour rule, not the Labor Code.

13. Conclusion

The Philippine labor framework draws a bright line between (a) paying for time not worked (which is optional, hence an allowable “deduction”) and (b) forfeiting a statutory benefit like regular‐holiday pay (presumptively illegal). While employers may deduct the exact minutes or hours of tardiness from the ordinary day’s wage, they may not, as a rule, reduce or withhold the mandated holiday pay merely because the employee came in late the day before—or on—the holiday. Any broader forfeiture scheme must rest on a valid CBA or a meticulously crafted company policy that satisfies the standards of reasonableness, voluntariness, and non-diminution of benefits.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific cases, consult a Philippine labor-law practitioner or seek guidance from the DOLE’s Bureau of Working Conditions.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.