How to Report a Scam on Messaging Apps Like Telegram

Online scams increasingly use encrypted or semi-private messaging platforms—channels, groups, and direct messages—to impersonate businesses, recruit “investment” victims, sell fake goods, run job and romance scams, and harvest personal or banking information. In the Philippines, reporting is most effective when done in two tracks at the same time: (1) platform-level reporting to disrupt the account/channel, and (2) law-enforcement/regulatory reporting to pursue identification, fund tracing, and prosecution.

This article explains what to report, who to report to, what evidence to preserve, and how Philippine laws commonly apply.


I. What counts as a “scam” on messaging apps

A “scam” is not a single legal label; it is conduct that may fall under several offenses depending on what happened. Common patterns include:

  • Investment/crypto/forex “guaranteed returns” and “signal group” schemes
  • Fake online selling (payment taken, no delivery; counterfeit or bait-and-switch)
  • Phishing (links/forms to steal logins, OTPs, card details)
  • Impersonation (bank, courier, government office, celebrity, or a known person)
  • Job/task scams (small payouts then “fees,” “top ups,” or account takeovers)
  • Romance/extortion (sextortion, threats, blackmail after private chats)
  • Account takeover (OTP/verification code theft; “vote for me” link)
  • Money mule recruitment (“rent your GCash/bank account”)

The reporting steps are similar across categories; what changes is which agency you notify and which laws are implicated.


II. First priority: protect yourself and stop ongoing loss

Before reporting, do immediate containment:

  1. Stop communicating and stop paying.

  2. Secure accounts: change passwords, enable 2FA, revoke suspicious sessions, and reset recovery email/phone if compromised.

  3. Call your bank/e-wallet immediately if you sent money. Ask for:

    • transaction tracing,
    • recipient account flagging/freezing (where possible), and
    • a written transaction record/certification.
  4. Warn close contacts if your account may be impersonated.

  5. Do not “counter-scam” or retaliate (it can complicate evidence, expose you to risk, or create liability).


III. Preserve evidence the way Philippine cases need it

In cyber cases, outcomes often depend on quality of evidence. Preserve before chats disappear.

A. Capture the full context

  • Screenshots showing:

    • the scammer’s username/handle, display name, phone number (if shown), and profile photo
    • the entire conversation thread including the lure, demands, payment instructions, threats
    • group/channel name, invite link, admin list (if visible), pinned posts
  • Screen recordings scrolling from top to bottom help show continuity.

B. Export and keep originals

  • Export chat (if the app allows) and keep the file intact.
  • Save original files sent (images, PDFs, voice notes), not just screenshots.
  • Save the URL/invite link, bot username, and any external links.

C. Preserve transaction evidence

  • Receipts, reference numbers, blockchain tx hashes, bank transfer slips, e-wallet screenshots
  • Recipient identifiers: account name, number, bank/e-wallet, QR code images

D. Write a short incident timeline

Create a one-page timeline with:

  • date/time (include time zone), platform, what was promised, what you paid, and what happened next

E. Avoid evidence contamination

  • Don’t edit screenshots (cropping is okay, but keep originals).
  • Don’t delete the conversation until after you’ve preserved copies.
  • Keep metadata where possible (original filenames, timestamps).

F. Legal framework for electronic evidence

Philippine courts recognize electronic evidence under the Rules on Electronic Evidence (A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC). Good practice is to be ready to authenticate:

  • that the screenshots/files came from your device/account, and
  • that they accurately reflect what was displayed at the time.

IV. Report inside the messaging app to disrupt the scam

Platform reporting is mainly for takedown and disruption—it may not identify the perpetrator, but it can reduce harm.

Typical in-app reporting actions

  • Report user / report group / report channel for scam/fraud
  • Block the account and leave the group/channel
  • Report specific messages that contain payment instructions, phishing links, threats, or impersonation
  • If there is a bot, report the bot and any associated channel

What to include in the report

  • short description: “investment scam,” “fake seller,” “phishing,” etc.
  • key identifiers: username/handle, channel/group link, phone number (if any)
  • attach the clearest screenshots (profile + payment demand + proof of payment)

Why platform reports sometimes feel slow

Many messaging services are cross-border. They may enforce their own policies and remove content/accounts, but identification often requires legal processes and cooperation that may involve foreign jurisdictions.


V. Where to report in the Philippines

You generally report to (1) cybercrime law enforcement, and (2) regulators relevant to the scam type.

A. Cybercrime law enforcement (primary)

  • Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP ACG) – for cybercrime complaints, case build-up, coordination with local units
  • National Bureau of Investigation Cybercrime Division (NBI CCD) – for cybercrime investigations, digital forensics support, case filing assistance

Either can take your complaint. Choose whichever is more accessible; the key is fast reporting with preserved evidence.

B. If money moved through regulated channels

  • Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) – for complaints involving banks, e-money issuers, and supervised entities (consumer assistance/complaints)
  • Your bank/e-wallet provider – fraud reporting and possible account action

C. If it’s an investment solicitation

  • Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines (SEC) – for unregistered securities, Ponzi-like schemes, “investment” solicitations

D. If it involves personal data misuse

  • National Privacy Commission (NPC) – for unlawful processing/disclosure of personal data, doxxing, identity misuse (depending on facts)

E. If it implicates money laundering indicators

  • Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) – usually engaged through covered institutions and law enforcement; victims typically start with their bank/e-wallet and cybercrime units

F. If the scam includes trafficking/sexual exploitation/child abuse content

Report immediately to cybercrime units; specific statutes and urgent protective measures may apply.


VI. How to file a report that can become a case

Step 1: Prepare a complaint packet

Bring both printed and digital copies:

  • Your incident timeline
  • Screenshots/screen recordings/exported chat
  • Links, usernames, numbers, wallet addresses
  • Proof of payment and bank/e-wallet transaction details
  • Government ID and contact details

Step 2: Execute a complaint-affidavit

Law enforcement typically asks for a Complaint-Affidavit (often notarized) stating:

  • who you are,
  • what happened,
  • how you know it was the same person/account,
  • what you lost (money/data),
  • what evidence you have (attach as annexes)

Step 3: Ask for guidance on preservation and fund tracing

Request that investigators consider:

  • Preservation of electronic evidence (requests to service providers)
  • Tracing recipient accounts (bank/e-wallet coordination)
  • Identifying admins/beneficiaries behind groups/channels
  • Whether urgent action is possible (e.g., stopping further transfers)

Step 4: Obtain reference/receiving copy

Get your receiving copy or reference number for follow-up.


VII. Applicable Philippine laws commonly used in messaging-app scam cases

Your case may be evaluated under multiple laws at once.

A. Revised Penal Code (RPC) – traditional crimes applied to online conduct

  • Estafa (Swindling) – deceit causing damage, common for fake selling and “investment” fraud
  • Grave threats / coercion / unjust vexation – when threats or intimidation are used
  • Slander/libel – sometimes arises in retaliation situations (be cautious when publicly accusing)

B. Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175)

This law can:

  • treat certain crimes as cyber-related when committed through ICT (computers, networks, messaging platforms),
  • provide procedures supporting investigation (subject to legal requirements).

Cyber-related labeling can affect venue, penalties, and investigative tools.

C. E-Commerce Act (RA 8792)

Supports legal recognition of electronic data messages and signatures, and intersects with electronic transactions and fraud contexts.

D. Access Devices Regulation Act (RA 8484)

Often relevant when scams involve credit/debit cards, access device fraud, skimming, or misuse of payment credentials.

E. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (RA 10173)

Relevant when the scam involves:

  • unlawful collection or disclosure of personal information,
  • identity misuse, doxxing, or improper processing. (Exact applicability depends on roles and circumstances; law enforcement and NPC evaluate specifics.)

F. SIM Registration Act (RA 11934)

Can aid investigations by improving traceability of SIMs used in scams, but it is not a guarantee—scammers may use mule-registered SIMs or foreign numbers.

G. Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act (RA 9995)

If the scam includes non-consensual sharing or threats to share intimate images/videos.

H. Special laws for child exploitation content and trafficking-related conduct

Where applicable, reporting should be urgent; cybercrime units can coordinate with specialized teams.


VIII. What authorities can and cannot do in practice

What they can do (case-dependent)

  • Take sworn statements and collect electronic evidence
  • Coordinate with banks/e-wallets on tracing and possible holds (subject to policies and law)
  • Apply for appropriate legal processes for data collection (as required)
  • Build cases for prosecution and coordinate with prosecutors

Practical constraints

  • Messaging platforms may be hosted abroad; identification and content preservation may require cross-border requests or cooperation.
  • Scammers often use layers: mule accounts, fake IDs, disposable numbers, and intermediaries.

This is why early reporting + complete transaction details greatly improves the chance of tracing.


IX. Reporting money movements: best practices that increase recovery chances

  1. Report within hours, not days, if possible.

  2. Give your provider:

    • transaction reference number,
    • exact timestamp,
    • amount,
    • recipient account/wallet details,
    • screenshots of the scam conversation that instructed payment.
  3. Ask for:

    • a transaction history printout/certification,
    • confirmation that the recipient account is being flagged,
    • instructions for coordinating with investigators.

Even when funds can’t be reversed, reports help flag mule accounts and support future enforcement.


X. Avoiding legal pitfalls while warning others

Victims often want to post the scammer’s name/number publicly. This can backfire.

Safer alternatives

  • Report to platforms and authorities first.

  • If you must warn, stick to verifiable facts:

    • “This account asked me to transfer ₱X on [date] for [promise], then stopped responding.”
  • Avoid doxxing unrelated personal data or making accusations you cannot substantiate.

Posting private personal information can raise privacy and defamation risks depending on content and context.


XI. A practical checklist (Philippine context)

Within the first day

  • Preserve chats (screenshots + export + screen recording)
  • Preserve identifiers (usernames, links, numbers, wallet addresses)
  • Preserve payments (receipts, refs, account details)
  • Notify bank/e-wallet and request tracing/flagging
  • Report account/channel in-app and block

Within the next 1–3 days

  • Prepare timeline and complaint-affidavit with annexes
  • File with PNP ACG or NBI CCD
  • File regulator complaints if applicable (SEC for investments; BSP for supervised entities; NPC for data privacy issues)

XII. Template outline for a Complaint-Affidavit (content guide)

  • Caption/Title: “Complaint-Affidavit for Online Scam via Messaging App”
  • Personal details: name, address, contact, ID details
  • Narrative: chronological events with dates/times
  • How you were deceived: representations made; why you relied on them
  • Damage: amount lost, accounts compromised, other harm
  • Identifiers: usernames, links, phone numbers, recipient accounts
  • Evidence list: Annex “A” screenshots; “B” chat export; “C” payment receipts; etc.
  • Prayer: request investigation and filing of appropriate charges
  • Verification and signature; notarization as required

XIII. Key takeaways

  • Reporting is most effective when it combines platform takedown with Philippine law-enforcement reporting and financial-channel escalation.
  • Preserve evidence early and preserve it well—your screenshots and transaction references often become the backbone of the case.
  • Choose the correct parallel regulator when the scam touches investments, banking/e-money, or personal data misuse.
  • Be cautious with public accusations; focus on formal reporting and documented facts.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.