How to Report Illegal Online Gambling Sites Philippines

How to Report Illegal Online Gambling Sites in the Philippines

A practical legal guide for consumers, payment processors, and hosting providers


1. Why “illegal online gambling” needs to be reported

  • Consumer protection. Unlicensed sites offer no guarantee of payout and frequently harvest personal data.
  • National revenue. Every peso wagered on an unlicensed platform escapes taxation, shrinking funds that should support schools, universal healthcare, and infrastructure.
  • Anti-money-laundering (AML). Rogue gambling portals are prime conduits for fraud, terrorist financing, and large-scale remittance evasion.
  • Cyber-crime spill-over. Loan-sharking, “sextortion,” and human-trafficking rings often hide behind or fund illegal gaming operations.

2. The legal framework (core statutes & issuances)

Law / issuance Key relevance to illegal online gambling
Presidential Decree (PD) 1602 (1981) Baseline penalties for illegal gambling activities.
Republic Act (RA) 9287 (2004) Increases PD 1602 penalties when the illegal gambling involves large wagers or organized groups.
RA 7922 & PAGCOR Charter (PD 1869, as amended by RA 9487) Vests PAGCOR with exclusive authority to regulate “games of chance,” including e-gaming.
EO 13 (2017) Clarifies that Philippine-based offshore gambling operators (POGOs) need PAGCOR licenses or CEZA/AFAB sub-licenses and may not offer bets to persons located in the Philippines.
RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act) Adds cyber-offenses, such as online fraud and cybersquatting, and allows real-time traffic collection and computer data preservation.
RA 9160 as amended by RA 10927 (Anti-Money Laundering Act) Brings casinos—including online casinos—into the AML reporting net; requires suspicious-transaction and covered-transaction reports (STR/CTR).
BSP Circular No. 1108 (2020) Orders banks and e-wallets (e.g., GCash, Maya) to monitor gambling-related merchant codes and file AML reports.
PAGCOR Regulatory Manual & Gaming Site Audit Regulations Detail technical, geofencing, and “locally situated bettor” checks licensees must implement.
RA 8799 (Securities Regulation Code) & SEC advisories Penalties on unregistered investment schemes masked as “play-to-earn” or “crypto casino.”

3. Which conduct is illegal?

  1. Offering games of chance to persons located in the Philippines without a Philippine government license (PAGCOR, CEZA, AFAB, APECO).
  2. Licensed POGOs or e-sabong operators accepting local bets (breach of EO 13 and PAGCOR circulars).
  3. Skin-betting, loot-box wagering, or prediction markets that amount to games of chance but operate without a license.
  4. Advertising unlicensed gambling using PH-based social-media influencers or SMS blasts (Cybercrime Act & Consumer Act infractions).
  5. Payment facilitation (banks, e-wallets, crypto-exchanges) for the above, if done with knowledge or gross negligence.

4. Who investigates and enforces?

Agency Mandate & useful contact
PAGCOR Enforcement and Licensing Department (ELD) Primary regulator; issues cease-and-desist orders (CDOs) and IP blocks. Email: eld@pagcor.phHotline: (+632) 8521-6468
National Bureau of Investigation – Cybercrime Division (NBI-CCD) For criminal complaints, digital forensics, and cross-border takedowns. Trunkline: (+632) 8525-6098 local 3400
Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP-ACG) 24/7 complaint desk; joint raids with NBI & PAGCOR. Hotline/Viber: +63917-977-8762
Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) Compliance & Investigation Group Freezes assets and files civil forfeiture; accepts confidential tips. Email: secretariat@amlc.gov.ph
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Task Force POGO/EGames Pursues unpaid franchise tax and income tax; joins raids.
DICT Cybercrime Investigation & Coordinating Center (CICC) Coordinates ISP blocking and digital evidence preservation.

5. Step-by-step reporting procedure

Stage What to do Tips / Legal basis
A. Gather evidence • Screenshot the website/app (URL, date/time).
• Save transaction receipts, bank/GCash records, chat threads.
• Note IP address (use ping/whois) if possible.
RA 10175 allows you to preserve computer data for 30 days once you lodge a report.
B. Identify the right venue If the site claims any PAGCOR/CEZA license numbers, verify them on the PAGCOR Licensee Directory. If none, treat it as unlicensed and file with PAGCOR ELD and NBI-CCD. Dual-filing speeds up administrative IP blocking (PAGCOR) and criminal case build-up (NBI).
C. File the complaint 1. Online:
- PAGCOR e-Complaint Form (https://www.pagcor.ph/regulatory/complaint.php).
- NBI Online Complaints (https://www.nbi.gov.ph).
2. Walk-in: Bring two (2) printed copies of your Affidavit of Complaint plus your ID.
3. AMLC Secure File Upload for bulk STR data.
Affidavit must detail how you discovered the site, what you bet/lost, and why you believe it’s illegal. Attach all screenshots as annexes.
D. Cooperate in the investigation Expect follow-up for additional logs or to execute a Certificate of Authenticity (COA) of digital evidence. Under Rule 11, Sec. 2 of the Cybercrime Rules of Court, failure to authenticate screenshots can get them excluded.
E. Monitor and follow up Use the case reference number to check status. PAGCOR posts quarterly lists of domains it has blocked; NBI issues subpoena/ad-testificandum if prosecution is imminent. Government offices have 15 working days to issue an initial action per Republic Act 11032 (Ease of Doing Business Law).
F. Consider civil remedies Request restitution or damages in the criminal case or file an independent civil suit for fraudulent inducement (Civil Code Art. 19–21). Winning a civil suit requires proof the operator or its PH agent is reachable for service of summons and has assets within jurisdiction.

6. Penalties operators (and facilitators) face

Offense Fine / imprisonment
Illegal gambling under PD 1602 & RA 9287 ₱20,000 – ₱6 million fine and 6 months–12 years jail (graduated by role: bettor < financier < protector).
Cyber-offenses (RA 10175) +1 degree higher penalty than the underlying crime (e.g., estafa becomes reclusion temporal).
AML violations (RA 9160/10927) ₱500,000 – ₱1 million/day of violation; forfeiture of assets; possible closure of the financial institution for willful blindness.
Tax evasion (NIRC, RA 11590 for POGOs) 25 %–50 % surcharge, 12 % interest, and criminal prosecution.
Advertising unlicensed gambling (Consumer Act & PAGCOR memos) Up to ₱300,000 per violative ad plus takedown orders against influencers/marketing agencies.

7. Whistle-blower and witness protection

  • Witness Protection, Security and Benefit Act (RA 6981). If you are an employee of the illegal site, you may qualify for immunity and relocation.
  • AML good-faith defense. Bank officers who file STRs “in good faith” are statutorily immune (Sec. 9-B, AMLA).
  • Data privacy. PAGCOR and NBI treat complainant data as confidential law-enforcement data under the Data Privacy Act (RA 10173).

8. Cross-border domain and payment blocking

  1. Domain Name System (DNS) blocking. PAGCOR coordinates with the DICT and NTC to compel Philippine ISPs to null-route or single-point-blacklist offending domains under RA 7925.
  2. Payment interdiction. AMLC and BSP rapidly blacklist merchant category codes (MCC 7995/7800) tied to illicit sites; e-wallets must suspend accounts within 24 hours once notified.
  3. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs). The DOJ Office of Cybercrime liaises with ASEAN, U.S., and E.U. counterparts to freeze offshore bank accounts and seize servers.

9. Practical tips & common pitfalls

Do Don’t
Use a screen-recording tool to capture the wagering process live (adds credibility). Don’t alter screenshots—metadata tampering will be obvious in forensic review.
Report immediately; funds move quickly and logs rotate every 30 days. Don’t expect PAGCOR to refund your losses; it’s a regulator, not an ombudsman.
If large amounts (₱500k+) are involved, loop in a lawyer early for stronger evidence packaging. Don’t “test-bet” again after discovering illegality; you could be charged as a bettor.
For corporate ISPs or payment processors, draft a board resolution authorizing the report—it shows institutional good faith. Don’t rely on “.ph” domain absence; many rogue sites run on “.com” but still target locals.

10. Template: Affidavit of Complaint (core clauses)

  1. Identification – Name, age, citizenship, address.
  2. Jurisdictional statement – That the offense was committed within the Philippines via an internet connection located at _____.
  3. Factual narration – Dates, times, URLs, amount wagered/lost, promises made by the site, chats/emails.
  4. Legal allegations – Violation of PD 1602, RA 9287, RA 10175, EO 13, and other pertinent laws.
  5. Prayer – Request for investigation, issuance of subpoena, CDO, asset freeze, and prosecution.
  6. Verification and notarization.

Key takeaways

  1. Multi-agency approach. File with at least PAGCOR and either NBI-CCD or PNP-ACG; coordinate with AMLC for large sums or obvious laundering.
  2. Time is of the essence. Digital footprints fade; act within the 30-day retention window set by the Cybercrime Act.
  3. Documentation wins cases. Courts are wary of “he-said-she-said” cyber-evidence; your best weapon is a clean chain of custody.
  4. Civil & tax angles amplify pressure. Parallel BIR and AMLC actions often compel rogue operators to settle or abandon the PH market.
  5. Stay within the law yourself. Mere participation in unlicensed gambling is punishable; reporting does not grant retrospective immunity.

Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations change; consult a qualified Philippine lawyer or the relevant agency for specific situations.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.