Scope and purpose

Filipino travelers, students, tourists, and workers sometimes discover a Korean immigration stamp or notation bearing “68-1” (often written as “68-1”, “68(1)”, “68-1호”, or a similar shorthand) in a passport—typically placed near an exit/entry stamp or alongside an administrative note. Because Korean border control uses internal legal-article references and administrative codes that are not meant to be self-explanatory to the traveler, the notation is frequently misunderstood.

This article explains what a “68-1” notation commonly indicates in practice, how it can affect reentry to South Korea, and what Filipino nationals should do to assess and address the risk—using a Philippine legal and practical context (documentation, consular steps, travel planning, and common OFW/traveler scenarios).

This is general legal-information writing, not individualized legal advice. The exact legal effect of a “68-1” mark depends on the underlying Korean immigration record, not the stamp alone.

1) What “68-1” usually is: an internal legal/administrative reference

A “68-1” marking in a Korean immigration context is most often not a “visa type” and not a standard tourist entry category. Instead, it is typically a shorthand reference to a specific provision of Korean immigration law or an enforcement/administrative basis used by immigration officers when recording an action (e.g., a measure related to departure/exit, compliance, or an immigration disposition).

Why the stamp alone is not enough

Two people can have the same looking “68-1” notation but for different underlying reasons, including:

an immigration compliance issue that was resolved quickly;
a formal disposition (e.g., departure order, removal, or entry restriction);
a procedural notation connected to an investigation, fine, or administrative guidance; or
a data-entry shorthand tied to the person’s immigration file.

Bottom line: treat “68-1” as a red flag to verify your Korean immigration record, not as a definitive outcome by itself.

2) Common situations where “68-1” appears (practical patterns)

While the precise meaning depends on Korean records, Filipinos most often encounter “68-1”-type annotations after events like:

A) Overstay or unauthorized stay (even short)

Examples:

staying beyond the permitted period on visa-free entry or a short-term visa;
working while on a status that disallows work;
studying or training without the appropriate status.

Even if you departed voluntarily, Korean immigration may record the incident and place an administrative code.

B) Administrative fine or compliance action before departure

Some travelers resolve a matter by paying an overstay fine and departing. A code may be used to link the departure to the resolved case.

C) Denied entry / refused landing at the airport

If a traveler was denied entry (for suspected intent to work, insufficient funds, weak itinerary, past overstay indicators, etc.), immigration may stamp or annotate the passport. A “68-1” could be tied to how the refusal was categorized internally.

D) Departure order, removal, or related measure

If a person was required to leave under an order (as opposed to leaving normally), officers may use an internal legal reference code.

E) Prior deportation/exit order + future reentry management

Codes are often used to implement or track reentry restrictions, watchlists, and compliance.

3) Reentry to Korea: what can happen if your record is flagged

Korean entry is always discretionary at the port of entry, even if you hold a valid visa or have visa-free eligibility. If your immigration file shows a prior issue associated with “68-1,” common outcomes include:

A) Secondary inspection (additional questioning)

Expect questions about:

prior stay history and purpose;
employment and ties to the Philippines;
itinerary, accommodation, funds, and return ticket;
prior violations or prior denials.

B) Refusal of entry even with documents

If immigration concludes you are likely to violate conditions again, you can be refused entry and returned on the next flight.

C) Reentry ban / restriction period

If the underlying action corresponds to a formal immigration measure, your record may include a ban period (duration varies by the nature and severity of the case). Some bans run automatically from the date of departure or order; others require separate lifting procedures.

D) Visa issuance problems

A past record can cause:

stricter scrutiny at the Korean Embassy/Consulate;
requests for additional documents;
denial of the visa application even if you qualify on paper.

4) Philippine context: why this matters for Filipinos (travel + labor realities)

A) Filipino travelers are frequently assessed for “risk of overstaying/working”

Korea is a common destination for tourism, visits, study, and employment pathways. Immigration officers often evaluate:

employment stability and income evidence in the Philippines;
genuine tourism purpose;
past travel compliance (Japan, Schengen, etc.);
family or partner ties in Korea.

A prior “68-1” notation may amplify perceived risk.

B) OFWs, trainees, and students face compounded documentation needs

For Filipinos leaving for work or training, Philippine exit compliance (e.g., employment documentation, POEA/DMW processes where applicable) is distinct from Korean entry requirements. Any mismatch—such as unclear purpose—can be fatal at the Korean border, especially if you have prior flags.

C) Passport annotations can affect transit and third-country travel

Some countries’ officers may ask about unusual stamps. While most do not interpret Korean internal codes, an annotation can trigger questions about travel history.

5) How to determine what your “68-1” actually means (without guessing)

Because the stamp is ambiguous, the key is to obtain the underlying disposition or at least confirm whether there is an active entry restriction.

A) Identify the context of the stamp

Record:

date and place (airport/office) where it was placed;
whether it appears on entry or exit;
any adjacent wording (Korean characters, numbers, “CANCELLED,” “VOID,” “DENIED,” etc.);
whether your travel involved any incident (overstay, questioning, visa cancellation, refusal).

B) Check whether you were ever issued a formal document

Many immigration actions come with paperwork (even if not fully understood at the time), such as:

notice of refusal of entry;
departure order;
fine/payment documentation;
removal/deportation documentation.

If you have any old papers, keep them—those often reveal the true basis more reliably than the passport stamp.

C) Seek confirmation through official channels

The most reliable confirmation comes from:

Korean immigration authority records tied to your identity; and/or
embassy/consulate feedback when processing a visa (if you apply).

6) Practical reentry planning for Filipinos with a “68-1” notation

When reentry risk exists, documentation quality and consistency matter more than usual.

A) Build a “port-of-entry ready” document set (tourist/visitor)

Proof of employment or business in the Philippines (COE, approved leave, business registration, ITR if available).
Proof of funds and financial capacity (bank cert/statements consistent with your profile).
Roundtrip ticket and coherent itinerary (realistic dates, accommodations).
Proof of ties in the Philippines (family, property, ongoing obligations—only what is truthful and provable).
If visiting someone: inviter’s status in Korea, relationship evidence, and a clear visit plan.

B) Avoid “purpose mismatch”

A classic trigger is declaring “tourism” with documents that suggest job-seeking or long-term stay intent. This is especially sensitive if there is a prior violation record.

C) Consider whether a visa application is safer than visa-free travel

If your profile or history suggests you may be flagged, obtaining the most appropriate visa in advance can help—but it is not a guarantee. If the underlying record includes an active ban, a visa may still be refused or entry may still be denied.

D) Be consistent and truthful in interviews

If asked about the “68-1” mark, do not invent an explanation. State facts:

you noticed the annotation,
you are uncertain of its internal meaning,
provide the truthful history of your prior stay and any issue that occurred,
present evidence of compliance and current lawful purpose.

False statements can independently justify refusal.

7) If the “68-1” is tied to an overstay or prior violation: consequences and mitigation themes

While outcomes vary, Korean immigration systems typically treat these factors as aggravating:

length of overstay,
repetition (more than once),
unauthorized work,
non-cooperation, absconding, or failure to pay fines,
use of false documents.

Mitigation themes that help in many systems (including Korea’s) include:

clear proof the prior issue is closed (e.g., fine paid, order complied with),
passage of time with clean travel history since,
stable Philippine ties (employment/business/family),
a narrow, credible purpose and short stay plan,
proper visa/status alignment (no gray-zone plans).

8) Philippine legal angle: what Philippine law does (and does not) do here

A) Philippine authorities do not control Korean admissibility

The Philippines cannot compel Korean immigration to admit a traveler. Admission is governed by Korean law and border discretion.

B) Philippine documentation can still influence outcomes

What the Philippines can affect is your ability to present:

credible identity and travel purpose,
lawful employment and travel history,
proper labor-migration compliance (where applicable).

C) Misrepresentation risks under Philippine law as well

Using falsified documents for travel can create liabilities in the Philippines (e.g., falsification and fraud-related exposure), apart from foreign immigration consequences.

9) Frequent misconceptions about “68-1”

“It’s a visa category.” Usually not. It is more often an internal legal/administrative reference.
“If I paid a fine, I’m automatically cleared.” Payment may close one aspect, but your record can still carry a restriction or risk flag.
“If I get a visa, entry is guaranteed.” Not guaranteed. Port-of-entry discretion can still apply.
“If the stamp is old, it no longer matters.” It might matter less over time, but immigration databases retain history, and old violations can still influence present decisions.

10) Best practices checklist (Philippines-based traveler)

Keep your old passports and any Korean immigration papers.
Prepare a factual timeline of prior Korea travel: dates, status, address, purpose, and any incident.
Ensure your current purpose matches your visa/status and documents.
Strengthen proof of Philippine ties in a truthful, document-backed way.
If you previously overstayed or were refused entry, assume secondary inspection is possible and plan accordingly.

Key takeaway

A “68-1” Korean immigration stamp/notation should be treated as a signal to verify your Korean immigration history. On its own, it does not conclusively tell you whether you are banned, but it often correlates with a recorded compliance or enforcement event. For Filipinos, the practical risk is heightened scrutiny at visa processing and at the port of entry—making documentation coherence, purpose alignment, and truthful disclosure decisive.