Legal Limits on Salary Deductions in Philippine Labor Law

I. Overview

Under Philippine labor law, the default rule is simple: wages must be paid in full and on time, and no deductions may be made unless clearly allowed by law or regulations and/or with the worker’s valid consent.

Because wages are considered a matter of social justice and family survival, the law treats salary deductions very strictly. Employers who make unauthorized or excessive deductions risk labor complaints, money claims, and even criminal liability.

This article walks through the key legal limits on salary deductions in the Philippines, the types of deductions that are allowed, those that are prohibited, and the conditions that must be observed.

II. Legal Framework

The main sources of rules on salary deductions are:

  • The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended) – particularly the provisions on wages, deductions, deposits, and unlawful acts regarding wages.

  • The Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Labor Code – especially rules on wage deductions, deposits, and wage protection.

  • Special social legislation:

    • Social Security System (SSS) law
    • PhilHealth laws
    • Pag-IBIG Fund law
    • National Internal Revenue Code (for income tax withholding)

  • Civil Code provisions on wages (e.g., limited execution/attachment of wages).

  • DOLE (Department of Labor and Employment) regulations and advisories and Supreme Court decisions interpreting what deductions are valid or invalid.

All of these are read together using the pro-labor principle: in case of doubt, interpretations are generally resolved in favor of the worker.

III. Basic Principles Governing Salary Deductions

1. General Prohibition

As a rule, no deductions from wages are allowed unless:

  1. They are authorized by law; or
  2. They are expressly authorized by the employee in writing, and
  3. They are for the employee’s benefit; and
  4. They comply with the limits and conditions set by DOLE and the Labor Code.

Employers cannot “invent” deduction schemes, even if they seem reasonable, unless they fit within these legally recognized categories.

2. Non-Interference in Disposal of Wages

The Labor Code has a principle of non-interference: employers must not control how workers spend their wages. This is why practices like forcing employees to buy from a company store or to avail of certain services are generally prohibited.

3. Minimum Wage and Take-Home Pay

Deductions cannot be used to defeat minimum wage laws. Generally:

  • Statutory minimum wage must still be observed after mandatory deductions such as tax and government contributions.
  • For voluntary deductions (e.g., loans, insurance, canteen charges), DOLE practice and policy emphasize that take-home pay should not be reduced to an amount that compromises the worker’s and their family’s basic needs. Many DOLE issuances and CBAs therefore set specific caps (for example, not more than a certain percentage of the employee’s wage per payroll period).

IV. What Is Not Considered a Salary Deduction: “No Work, No Pay”

Some items look like deductions but are legally different:

  1. Absences, tardiness, and undertime If an employee is late, absent, or leaves early, the employer is not “deducting” wages; the employee is simply not earning wages for time not worked under the no-work-no-pay principle.

  2. Suspensions For days of valid disciplinary suspension, the employee also does not earn wages. Again, this is not technically a deduction but a consequence of not rendering work.

These are allowed, provided that labor standards and due process for discipline are observed.

V. Mandatory Deductions Required by Law

These are deductions that the employer must make because they are imposed by statute.

1. Withholding Tax on Compensation

  • Employers are required to withhold income tax on employees’ compensation, based on tax brackets and rules issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
  • Failure to withhold can result in employer liability; therefore, this deduction is clearly lawful.

2. SSS Contributions (Employee Share)

  • Private sector employees (below certain age and subject to coverage rules) must be covered by the Social Security System (SSS).
  • The employee’s share of the SSS contribution is deducted from salary, while the employer’s share is shouldered by the employer.
  • Employers must remit both shares to SSS; non-remittance is a serious violation and can even be criminal.

3. PhilHealth Contributions (Employee Share)

  • Employees and employers must contribute to PhilHealth.
  • Again, the employee share is deducted from salary, and the employer share is separate and cannot be passed on to the employee.

4. Pag-IBIG Fund Contributions (Employee Share)

  • Under Pag-IBIG law, employees contribute a portion of their wage, matched by employer contributions at specified rates.
  • The employee contribution is deducted from salary; employer contributions are not.

5. Court-Ordered or Legally Mandated Deductions

Subject to Civil Code and special law limitations, certain deductions may be made pursuant to:

  • Garnishments or attachments ordered by courts or quasi-judicial bodies (e.g., for support obligations), but wages are generally protected from execution except for debts related to basic family needs.
  • Statutory liens such as those for unpaid government obligations, if expressly allowed by law.

Even in these cases, there are limits to how much of the wage may be subjected to execution or garnishment, especially where family support is concerned.

VI. Deductions Allowed with Employee’s Consent (But Subject to Strict Conditions)

Beyond mandatory deductions, the law allows certain voluntary deductions, but only under specific conditions.

1. Insurance Premiums

An employer may deduct from the employee’s salary amounts for insurance premiums if:

  • The employee is insured with their consent, and
  • The deduction is authorized in writing.

Without that clear consent, insurance-related deductions are not allowed.

2. Union Dues and Other Union-Related Deductions (Check-Off)

Where there is a legitimate labor union, deductions may be made for:

  • Union dues
  • Other agreed fees (agency fees, special assessments, etc.)

But only if:

  • There is a valid collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and/or
  • The individual worker’s written authorization (check-off authorization) exists, and
  • Legal formalities for special assessments (secret ballot, majority approval, etc.) are followed.

Unauthorized union-related deductions are illegal and refundable to the employee.

3. Deductions Authorized by DOLE Regulations

The Labor Code allows deductions in cases authorized by the Secretary of Labor and Employment, typically through DOLE rules and advisories. Common examples include:

  • Salary loans (from the employer, a cooperative, or partner financial institutions)
  • Canteen or cafeteria charges
  • Company-provided housing or utilities
  • Company uniforms, tools, or equipment, when the expense is for the employee’s benefit and is consensual

These usually require:

  • Written authorization from the employee
  • Clear statement of the amount and purpose
  • Reasonable limits (e.g., deductions not to exceed a certain percentage of wages per pay period, and not to reduce pay below the minimum wage or reasonable subsistence level)
  • No coercion or undue pressure

VII. Deductions for Loss or Damage: Very Strict Conditions

One of the most litigated areas is the deduction of the cost of loss, breakage, or damage to company property.

Under the Labor Code and its IRR, an employer can deduct for loss or damage to tools, materials, products, or equipment only if ALL of the following are present:

  1. Actual Loss or Damage There must be clear proof that loss or damage actually occurred (e.g., missing items, broken machinery, shortages in cash or inventory).

  2. Fault or Negligence of the Employee It must be shown that the loss or damage is due to the employee’s fault or negligence. If the loss is due to normal wear and tear, inherent risk, or managerial decisions, it cannot be charged to the employee.

  3. Opportunity to Be Heard (Due Process) The employee must be:

    • Informed of the alleged loss or damage and
    • Given a chance to explain (often in writing) before any deduction is made. This is a form of procedural due process.

  4. Reasonable Amount The amount to be deducted must be reasonable and must not exceed the actual loss or damage.

  5. Limit on the Amount Per Pay Period DOLE regulations impose caps on how much may be deducted from wages for loss or damage in a given pay period (commonly framed around a percentage of wages so that the employee can still support themselves and their family). Employers must spread out deductions rather than take the entire amount from a single paycheck if it would unduly impair the worker’s subsistence.

  6. Employee’s Written Authorization (in practice) While the law focuses on the above elements, DOLE’s implementing rules and practice often require written acknowledgement from the employee regarding the loss and the manner of payment, to avoid disputes.

If any of these elements is missing, the deduction can be declared illegal. In many cases, the proper remedy for the employer is to file a civil or criminal case (e.g., theft, estafa), not to self-help through unilateral salary deductions.

VIII. Company Loans, Salary Advances, and Third-Party Loans

Salary deductions are commonly used as a convenient way to repay loans. The legitimacy of these deductions depends on several factors.

1. Company Loans / Salary Advances

For loans given directly by the employer:

  • There must be clear, voluntary consent by the employee.
  • The terms of the loan (principal, interest, repayment schedule) should be in writing.
  • Deductions must not be unconscionable and should be spread out reasonably.
  • As a matter of labor policy, deductions should not pull the employee’s wage below the applicable minimum wage or a reasonable level for subsistence, especially when combined with other compulsory deductions.

2. Loans from Cooperatives or Partner Financial Institutions

When an employee borrows from a cooperative or bank and authorizes “salary deduction” as a mode of payment:

  • The employer becomes, in effect, a collecting agent, but only because the employee has authorized this in writing.

  • Employers should verify the authenticity of the authorization and maintain records.

  • Deductions must respect:

    • Minimum wage laws
    • DOLE limitations on deduction percentages
    • Any applicable caps in CBAs or company policies

If the employee revokes the authorization, the employer may need to stop deductions, subject to the terms of the loan contract and any legal obligations; disputes then become mainly between the employee and the lender, not a justification for unilateral employer action beyond what is legally permitted.

IX. Deductions as Penalties or Fines

Using salary deductions as disciplinary fines or penalties (e.g., P100 fine per late arrival, cash penalties for minor rule violations) is highly problematic.

  • The Labor Code and its policy framework discourage monetary penalties that reduce wages, unless they fall under a clearly authorized category (e.g., loss or damage with full compliance with the conditions).
  • Discipline should be imposed mainly through non-monetary measures, such as reprimands, suspensions, or dismissal in extreme cases, following due process.

DOLE and courts often strike down penalty deductions (e.g., “fines” for wearing the wrong uniform) as unlawful, ordering refunds to employees.

X. Prohibited or Questionable Deduction Practices

Some deductions are generally not allowed or are considered suspect unless they clearly fit an authorized category and all conditions are met:

  1. “Service charges” or administrative fees imposed on salaries simply for payroll processing or money transfer convenience, if not grounded in law or valid agreement.

  2. Charges for recruitment or placement borne by the worker, especially when recruitment is for local employment and should be borne by the employer.

  3. Forced purchase of company products or services, such as:

    • Mandatory meals from the company canteen
    • Required purchases from a company store unless these are clearly voluntary, fairly priced, and comply with DOLE rules.

  4. Passing on employer obligations to the employee, such as:

    • Employer’s share in SSS, PhilHealth, Pag-IBIG
    • Employer’s share in mandatory benefits These may not be deducted from the employee’s wage.

  5. Arbitrary deductions for “training costs” or “bond” when an employee resigns, unless:

    • There is a clear, valid, and lawful agreement, and
    • The amount is reasonable and not contrary to labor law or public policy (for example, restrictions on restraint of trade / right to resign).

XI. Special Note on Domestic Workers (Kasambahay)

For domestic workers, the Kasambahay law sets additional protections. In general:

  • Deductions are heavily regulated and usually limited to:

    • Mandatory contributions
    • Clearly agreed loan repayments
    • Proven loss or damage, subject to strict proof and reasonable limits

  • Employers cannot simply deduct for household expenses or personal consumption without clear legal basis and consent.

Although this is a specialized area, the same guiding themes apply: protection of wages, strict limits on deductions, and necessity of written consent and reasonableness.

XII. Remedies and Enforcement

When salary deductions exceed legal limits or are not authorized:

  1. Internal grievance and HR processes Many companies and CBAs provide internal grievance mechanisms. Employees may raised the issue with HR, the union, or management.

  2. Complaint before DOLE (Regional/Field Office) For labor standards issues like unlawful deductions, employees may file a complaint with DOLE, which can:

    • Conduct an inspection or investigation
    • Order payment of refunds for unlawfully deducted amounts
    • Impose administrative sanctions on the employer

  3. Money Claims before the NLRC or appropriate tribunals Employees may also pursue money claims (for illegally deducted wages, damages, attorney’s fees), often via the National Labor Relations Commission or other authorized bodies.

  4. Criminal and Administrative Liability Certain acts relating to unlawful wage deductions can also be penalized under the Labor Code and other laws—especially if there is:

    • Intentional non-remittance of government contributions
    • Repeated or willful violations of wage regulations.

XIII. Practical Guidelines for Employers and Employees

For Employers

  • Treat wage deductions as an exception, not the norm.

  • Before implementing any deduction, ask:

    1. Is this required by law?
    2. If voluntary, is there clear written consent from the employee?
    3. Is the deduction for the employee’s benefit?
    4. Does it comply with DOLE rules and caps?
    5. Will the deduction leave the employee with sufficient take-home pay, consistent with minimum wage and basic needs?

  • Maintain transparent records, copies of authorizations, and clear payroll documentation.

For Employees

  • Read and keep copies of any salary deduction authorizations you sign (for loans, insurance, cooperative dues, etc.).

  • Monitor your payslips and ask HR to explain any unclear deductions.

  • If you believe a deduction is unauthorized or excessive, you may:

    • Raise the issue internally (HR, union, grievance machinery) and
    • If unresolved, seek assistance from DOLE or a labor lawyer.

XIV. Conclusion

In Philippine labor law, salary deductions are heavily regulated in line with the constitutional policy of full protection to labor and the recognition that wages support not just the worker but their family. The overarching rule is:

Deductions from wages are generally prohibited, except when clearly authorized by law or by valid written consent for the employee’s benefit, and always subject to strict limits on amount and process.

For both employers and employees, understanding these legal limits is essential to ensuring compliance, avoiding disputes, and upholding the dignity and well-being of workers.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login