NBI Clearance and Theft Records in the Philippines

I. Introduction

In the Philippines, an NBI Clearance is one of the most commonly required documents for employment, business licensing, travel, immigration, professional regulation, and other official transactions. It is issued by the National Bureau of Investigation and is often treated by employers and institutions as a general proof that a person has no derogatory criminal record on file.

One common concern involves theft records. Many applicants worry that a theft complaint, a dismissed case, an old conviction, a pending warrant, or even a similarity of names may appear when applying for NBI Clearance. This issue is especially sensitive because theft is a crime involving dishonesty and moral character, and it may affect employment, licensing, migration, and reputation.

This article explains the Philippine legal context of NBI Clearance, theft-related records, “hits,” pending cases, dismissed cases, convictions, expungement concerns, employer use of clearances, and practical remedies available to affected individuals.

II. What Is an NBI Clearance?

An NBI Clearance is an official document issued by the National Bureau of Investigation stating whether the applicant has a record, pending case, warrant, or other derogatory information in the NBI database.

It is different from a police clearance or barangay clearance. A police clearance is generally based on local police records, while an NBI Clearance checks against a broader national database. Because of this, many employers and government agencies prefer or require NBI Clearance.

An NBI Clearance may be required for:

  1. Local employment;
  2. Overseas employment;
  3. Passport or visa-related purposes;
  4. Government transactions;
  5. Professional licensing;
  6. Business permits;
  7. Immigration or naturalization matters;
  8. Court and legal proceedings;
  9. Adoption, guardianship, or other civil matters;
  10. Other institutional requirements.

The clearance does not necessarily mean that the person has never been accused of a crime. Rather, it reflects whether there is a record, match, or derogatory information appearing in the relevant NBI system at the time of processing.

III. What Is Theft Under Philippine Law?

Theft is punished under the Revised Penal Code, particularly Article 308 and related provisions.

In general terms, theft is committed when a person:

  1. Takes personal property;
  2. The property belongs to another;
  3. The taking is done with intent to gain;
  4. The taking is without the owner’s consent;
  5. The taking is without violence against or intimidation of persons, and without force upon things.

If violence, intimidation, or force upon things is involved, the crime may not be simple theft. It may instead be robbery or another offense, depending on the facts.

Theft may involve money, jewelry, mobile phones, vehicles, office property, store merchandise, household items, documents, or other movable property. The penalty generally depends on the value of the property and the circumstances of the offense.

Theft is significant in clearance and employment contexts because it is often viewed as an offense involving dishonesty, trustworthiness, and moral character.

IV. Theft, Qualified Theft, and Related Offenses

Not all theft cases are the same. Philippine law distinguishes among different forms and circumstances.

1. Simple Theft

Simple theft involves unlawful taking without the aggravating circumstances that would make the offense more serious.

Examples may include:

  • Taking another person’s cellphone;
  • Shoplifting;
  • Taking money from a wallet;
  • Taking property from a workplace without permission.

2. Qualified Theft

Qualified theft is a more serious form of theft. It may arise when the taking is committed under special circumstances, such as abuse of confidence, domestic service, or when the property taken consists of certain types of items recognized by law.

A common employment-related example is when an employee entrusted with company property allegedly takes money, inventory, equipment, or funds. Because trust is involved, employers often treat qualified theft allegations very seriously.

3. Estafa Distinguished from Theft

Some cases involving property or money may be charged as estafa rather than theft. The distinction usually depends on how possession was obtained and whether deceit, abuse of confidence, or misappropriation is involved.

In simplified terms:

  • Theft usually involves taking property without consent.
  • Estafa often involves deceit, fraudulent means, or misappropriation after lawful receipt of property.

The classification matters because the record appearing in criminal databases may identify the specific charge.

V. What Does It Mean to Have a “Theft Record”?

A person may loosely say they have a “theft record,” but legally and practically this can mean different things.

It may refer to:

  1. A police blotter entry;
  2. A barangay complaint;
  3. A complaint filed before the prosecutor;
  4. A pending preliminary investigation;
  5. A criminal information filed in court;
  6. A pending criminal case;
  7. An outstanding warrant of arrest;
  8. A dismissed case;
  9. An acquittal;
  10. A conviction;
  11. A probation record;
  12. A case archived because the accused could not be found;
  13. A record belonging to another person with a similar name;
  14. A mistaken or outdated database entry.

Not all of these should be treated the same. A pending complaint is different from a conviction. A dismissed case is different from an acquittal. A name match is different from an actual criminal record.

VI. What Is an NBI “Hit”?

When an applicant applies for NBI Clearance, the system may generate a “hit.” This means that the applicant’s name, identifying details, or biometrics may have matched a record in the database.

A hit does not automatically mean the applicant is guilty of a crime. It may mean:

  1. The applicant has a pending case;
  2. The applicant has an old criminal record;
  3. The applicant has a warrant;
  4. Someone with the same or similar name has a record;
  5. The database requires manual verification;
  6. The record needs further confirmation.

Many people receive hits because of common names. For example, an applicant named “Juan Dela Cruz” or “Maria Santos” may be matched with another person’s record. In that case, the NBI must verify whether the applicant is the same person as the one in the database.

For theft-related records, a hit may be triggered by a pending theft case, qualified theft case, warrant, conviction, or similar record.

VII. Does a Theft Complaint Automatically Appear in NBI Clearance?

Not always.

A mere accusation, barangay complaint, or police blotter entry does not necessarily mean that it will appear in an NBI Clearance. The record is more likely to matter if the complaint has progressed into formal criminal proceedings, such as:

  1. A complaint filed with the prosecutor;
  2. A criminal case filed in court;
  3. A warrant of arrest issued;
  4. A conviction entered;
  5. A court record transmitted or reflected in the relevant databases.

However, database practices can vary, and records may appear depending on how agencies transmit, encode, or update information.

The key point is this: an accusation alone is not the same as a conviction, but it may still create practical problems if it results in a formal record or database hit.

VIII. Pending Theft Cases and NBI Clearance

If a person has a pending theft case in court, the NBI Clearance may reflect the existence of a derogatory record or may require further verification.

A pending case means the person is accused, but guilt has not yet been finally determined. Under Philippine constitutional principles, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

Even so, a pending case can affect:

  1. Employment applications;
  2. Overseas work processing;
  3. Visa applications;
  4. Government appointments;
  5. Security-sensitive jobs;
  6. Professional licensing;
  7. Positions involving money, inventory, confidential data, or trust.

Employers may ask about pending cases, but they should avoid treating a pending accusation as automatic proof of guilt. The applicant may explain the status of the case and provide court documents showing whether the matter is pending, dismissed, archived, or resolved.

IX. Dismissed Theft Cases and NBI Clearance

A dismissed theft case should not be treated the same as a conviction. If a case was dismissed, the applicant may request correction, updating, or clarification of records.

However, dismissed cases may still cause problems if:

  1. The NBI database has not yet been updated;
  2. The court order of dismissal was not transmitted;
  3. The applicant has a name similarity issue;
  4. The record remains tagged as pending;
  5. There are multiple related cases;
  6. There is an outstanding warrant not yet lifted;
  7. The dismissal was without prejudice and may be refiled.

A person whose theft case was dismissed should keep certified true copies of:

  1. The order of dismissal;
  2. Certificate of finality, if available;
  3. Court clearance;
  4. Prosecutor’s resolution, if dismissal occurred at the preliminary investigation stage;
  5. Affidavit of desistance, if relevant, though this alone does not automatically terminate a criminal case;
  6. Other court or prosecutor documents proving the case status.

These documents may help during NBI quality control or verification.

X. Acquittal and NBI Records

An acquittal means that the court found the accused not guilty. This is stronger than a simple dismissal in many practical contexts, because the criminal charge has been adjudicated in favor of the accused.

Still, an acquitted person may encounter a hit if the database has not been updated. The person may need to present:

  1. The decision of acquittal;
  2. Certificate of finality;
  3. Court clearance;
  4. Other court-issued documents.

The applicant may also request that the relevant record be updated to reflect the acquittal.

XI. Conviction for Theft and NBI Clearance

A conviction for theft is a serious matter. If a person was convicted, the record may appear in the NBI system and affect the issuance or content of the clearance.

The consequences may include:

  1. Difficulty obtaining employment;
  2. Disqualification from certain positions;
  3. Rejection from jobs involving trust, money, inventory, or security;
  4. Issues with professional licenses;
  5. Problems with immigration, visa, or overseas employment applications;
  6. Possible effect on civil service eligibility or government appointment;
  7. Reputational harm.

The legal effect depends on the nature of the conviction, the penalty imposed, whether the conviction is final, whether probation was granted, whether the penalty has been served, and whether any legal relief has been obtained.

XII. Does Serving the Sentence Remove the Theft Record?

Serving a sentence does not automatically erase the criminal record. Even after imprisonment, payment of fine, probation, or completion of penalty, the historical fact of conviction may remain in official records.

However, the person may be able to show rehabilitation, compliance, and restoration of civil rights depending on the circumstances. Certain legal remedies may also be available, such as probation, executive clemency, pardon, or other relief. These do not automatically mean that every record disappears from every database.

In practical terms, a person with an old theft conviction should be prepared to explain:

  1. What happened;
  2. When it happened;
  3. Whether the sentence was served;
  4. Whether probation was completed;
  5. Whether there has been rehabilitation;
  6. Whether there are no further cases;
  7. Whether the person has since maintained good conduct.

XIII. Probation and Theft Records

Probation allows a qualified offender to avoid imprisonment under court supervision, subject to conditions. If a person convicted of theft was granted probation and successfully completed it, the court may issue an order terminating probation.

However, probation does not necessarily erase the existence of the conviction for all purposes. The person should keep:

  1. The probation order;
  2. The order terminating probation;
  3. Court clearance;
  4. Proof of compliance with conditions.

These documents may be useful when dealing with NBI hits, employment explanations, or legal documentation.

XIV. Can Theft Records Be Expunged in the Philippines?

The Philippines does not have the same broad “expungement” system found in some foreign jurisdictions where criminal records are routinely sealed or erased after a period.

In general, Philippine criminal records are not automatically erased simply because time has passed. However, records may be corrected, updated, clarified, or annotated if they are inaccurate, outdated, or misleading.

Possible relief may include:

  1. Correction of mistaken identity;
  2. Updating records after dismissal or acquittal;
  3. Lifting of warrants;
  4. Presentation of court orders;
  5. Requesting certification of no pending case;
  6. Seeking legal remedies related to rehabilitation, pardon, or executive clemency where applicable;
  7. Invoking data privacy rights where processing of inaccurate or outdated personal data is involved.

The appropriate remedy depends on the nature of the record.

XV. Mistaken Identity and Similar Names

One of the most common causes of NBI Clearance problems is mistaken identity or name similarity. A person may receive a hit because another individual with the same or similar name has a theft case or warrant.

In such cases, the applicant should cooperate with the verification process and may need to provide identifying documents, such as:

  1. Birth certificate;
  2. Valid government IDs;
  3. Passport;
  4. Previous NBI Clearance;
  5. Barangay certificate;
  6. Court clearance;
  7. Affidavit of denial, if required;
  8. Other documents proving that the applicant is not the person in the record.

The NBI may conduct manual verification to determine whether the record belongs to the applicant.

XVI. Warrants of Arrest and NBI Clearance

An outstanding warrant of arrest is one of the most serious reasons for an NBI hit. If a theft case resulted in a warrant, the applicant may be flagged.

A warrant may exist because:

  1. A criminal case was filed in court;
  2. The accused failed to appear;
  3. The accused never received notice but was charged;
  4. The case was archived;
  5. Bail was not posted;
  6. The warrant was not recalled despite case developments;
  7. Records were not updated.

A person who discovers a warrant through an NBI hit should consult a lawyer immediately. The proper steps may include verifying the case in court, filing the appropriate motions, posting bail if allowed, requesting recall or lifting of the warrant, or addressing the pending case.

Ignoring a warrant can lead to arrest.

XVII. Theft Cases Settled With the Complainant

Many theft complaints are “settled” privately between the complainant and the accused. However, criminal cases are offenses against the State. Even if the private complainant forgives the accused or signs an affidavit of desistance, the case may still proceed depending on the stage and circumstances.

Settlement may help, but it does not automatically erase a criminal record.

If a theft case was settled, the accused should confirm whether:

  1. The complaint was withdrawn before filing in court;
  2. The prosecutor dismissed the complaint;
  3. The court dismissed the case;
  4. The dismissal became final;
  5. Any warrant was recalled;
  6. NBI or court records were updated.

A private settlement without formal legal action may not be enough to clear a record.

XVIII. Employer Use of NBI Clearance in Theft-Related Cases

Employers in the Philippines commonly require NBI Clearance, especially for positions involving:

  1. Cash handling;
  2. Accounting;
  3. Inventory;
  4. Security;
  5. Delivery;
  6. Warehousing;
  7. Retail;
  8. Banking;
  9. Government service;
  10. Domestic work;
  11. Overseas employment;
  12. Access to confidential information.

A theft record may influence hiring decisions. However, employers should exercise fairness and caution.

An employer should distinguish between:

  1. A mere hit;
  2. A name match;
  3. A pending case;
  4. A dismissed case;
  5. An acquittal;
  6. A final conviction.

Rejecting an applicant solely because of a hit, without allowing explanation or verification, may be unfair. It may also raise labor, due process, or data privacy concerns depending on the circumstances.

XIX. Data Privacy Considerations

NBI Clearance and criminal records involve sensitive personal information. Under Philippine data privacy principles, organizations handling such information should process it lawfully, fairly, and only for legitimate purposes.

Employers and agencies should avoid unnecessary disclosure of an applicant’s alleged criminal history. They should also protect documents from unauthorized access.

Applicants have an interest in ensuring that records are accurate and updated. If a record is incorrect, outdated, or belongs to another person, the applicant may seek correction or clarification through the proper channels.

XX. What To Do If Your NBI Clearance Has a Theft Hit

A person who receives an NBI hit related to theft should take the matter seriously but should not panic. A hit is not automatically a conviction.

Practical steps include:

  1. Wait for the NBI verification result;
  2. Ask what record caused the hit, if disclosed through the proper process;
  3. Determine whether the record belongs to you or to another person with a similar name;
  4. Gather court or prosecutor documents;
  5. Verify with the court where the case is pending or was filed;
  6. Obtain certified true copies of dismissal, acquittal, or termination orders;
  7. Check if there is an outstanding warrant;
  8. Consult a lawyer if the record involves a pending case, warrant, or conviction;
  9. Request updating or correction of records where appropriate;
  10. Keep copies of all relevant legal documents for future applications.

XXI. Important Documents for Clearing or Explaining a Theft Record

Depending on the case, the following may be useful:

  1. Prosecutor’s resolution dismissing the complaint;
  2. Court order dismissing the case;
  3. Judgment of acquittal;
  4. Certificate of finality;
  5. Court clearance;
  6. Order recalling or lifting warrant;
  7. Order granting probation;
  8. Order terminating probation;
  9. Proof of payment of fine or restitution;
  10. Affidavit of desistance;
  11. Compromise agreement, if relevant;
  12. Police clearance;
  13. Barangay certificate;
  14. Prior NBI Clearance;
  15. Valid government IDs;
  16. Birth certificate;
  17. Affidavit regarding mistaken identity.

The most persuasive documents are usually certified court or prosecutor records.

XXII. Can an Applicant Still Get NBI Clearance With a Theft Case?

It depends on the nature and status of the record.

An applicant may still obtain a clearance after verification, especially if:

  1. The hit was caused by a namesake;
  2. The case was dismissed;
  3. The applicant was acquitted;
  4. The record was outdated or erroneous;
  5. There is no pending warrant;
  6. The database is corrected or annotated.

If there is a pending case, warrant, or conviction, the clearance process may be affected. The applicant may need to resolve the case, secure court documents, or comply with legal requirements.

XXIII. Difference Between “No Record,” “With Hit,” and “Derogatory Record”

In common understanding:

1. No Record

This means no matching derogatory record was found in the system at the time of processing.

2. With Hit

This means there is a possible match requiring verification. It may or may not be the applicant’s record.

3. Derogatory Record

This means the system has identified adverse information connected to the applicant, such as a pending case, warrant, or conviction.

The exact wording and procedure may vary, but the practical distinction is important: a hit is not necessarily proof of criminal liability.

XXIV. Theft Records and Overseas Employment

For overseas employment, NBI Clearance is frequently required. A theft-related record may delay or complicate processing, especially for jobs involving trust, domestic work, caregiving, finance, logistics, security, or handling property.

Foreign employers, recruitment agencies, and immigration authorities may treat criminal records seriously. Applicants should avoid misrepresentation. If asked about criminal history, the applicant should answer truthfully and consistently with official records.

If a case was dismissed or the applicant was acquitted, certified documents should be prepared.

XXV. Theft Records and Visa Applications

Visa applications may ask about criminal charges, arrests, convictions, or pending cases. The wording matters. Some forms ask only about convictions; others ask about arrests, charges, or pending proceedings.

An NBI Clearance with a theft-related issue may require explanation. Misrepresentation in visa applications can be more damaging than the underlying record.

Applicants should carefully read the question and, when necessary, seek legal advice from a Philippine lawyer and, for foreign immigration consequences, a qualified immigration lawyer in the destination country.

XXVI. Theft Records and Government Employment

Government employment often involves character, integrity, and eligibility requirements. A theft conviction may affect appointment or qualification, especially if the position involves public trust, funds, property, or confidential information.

A pending theft case may also raise concerns, but it should not automatically be equated with guilt. The specific agency rules, civil service requirements, and nature of the position matter.

Applicants should be prepared to disclose and explain matters truthfully when required.

XXVII. Juvenile Theft Records

If the alleged theft occurred when the person was a minor, special rules may apply under Philippine laws on children in conflict with the law. Juvenile proceedings are treated differently from ordinary adult criminal prosecutions.

The handling of records, confidentiality, diversion, intervention, and rehabilitation may differ. A person concerned about a juvenile record should seek specific legal advice because the applicable rules can be more protective and fact-sensitive.

XXVIII. Theft Records, Moral Turpitude, and Professional Licenses

Certain professions require good moral character. Theft may be considered relevant because it involves dishonesty. Professional regulatory bodies, licensing authorities, and employers may consider theft convictions or pending cases when evaluating character and fitness.

This may affect professions or occupations involving:

  1. Public accountability;
  2. Money or property;
  3. Fiduciary duties;
  4. Confidential information;
  5. Client trust;
  6. Professional ethics.

However, the effect of a theft record depends on whether there was a final conviction, the age of the case, rehabilitation, the rules of the profession, and the surrounding facts.

XXIX. False Statements About Theft Records

Applicants should be careful when answering forms that ask about criminal history. A false statement may create a separate problem, especially in government, immigration, licensing, or employment contexts.

If a form asks, “Have you ever been convicted?” a dismissed case may not be a conviction. But if a form asks, “Have you ever been charged?” or “Do you have any pending criminal case?” the answer may differ.

Applicants should read the exact wording and answer accurately.

XXX. Practical Scenarios

Scenario 1: The applicant has a namesake with a theft case.

The applicant may receive a hit but can usually clear it through verification and identity documents.

Scenario 2: The applicant had a theft complaint at the barangay level only.

If no formal criminal case was filed, it may not appear in NBI records, but this depends on whether any formal law enforcement or court record was created.

Scenario 3: The applicant had a theft case dismissed by the prosecutor.

The applicant should keep the prosecutor’s resolution and related documents. If a hit appears, the applicant may present proof of dismissal.

Scenario 4: The applicant had a theft case dismissed by the court.

The applicant should secure a certified court order and certificate of finality if available.

Scenario 5: The applicant was acquitted.

The applicant should present the judgment and certificate of finality if a hit remains.

Scenario 6: The applicant was convicted of theft.

The conviction may remain in official records. The applicant should seek legal advice on possible remedies and prepare documentation showing completion of sentence, probation, rehabilitation, or other relief.

Scenario 7: The applicant has a pending warrant.

The applicant should consult a lawyer immediately and verify the case with the court. A warrant should not be ignored.

XXXI. Rights of the Applicant

An applicant affected by a theft-related NBI hit may have several rights and interests, including:

  1. The right to due process;
  2. The presumption of innocence if the case is pending;
  3. The right to correct inaccurate personal information;
  4. The right to privacy and proper handling of sensitive information;
  5. The right to obtain court records concerning their own case;
  6. The right to counsel in criminal proceedings;
  7. The right to explain or contest mistaken identity;
  8. The right to seek appropriate remedies from courts or agencies.

These rights do not guarantee that a record will disappear, but they help ensure that records are accurate, lawful, and fairly used.

XXXII. Duties of Applicants

Applicants should also act responsibly. They should:

  1. Avoid falsifying documents;
  2. Avoid using another person’s identity;
  3. Disclose information truthfully when legally required;
  4. Keep copies of court documents;
  5. Resolve pending warrants or cases;
  6. Consult counsel when facing criminal issues;
  7. Avoid assuming that a dismissed case is automatically removed from all databases;
  8. Follow proper NBI procedures for verification and correction.

XXXIII. Duties of Employers and Institutions

Employers and institutions using NBI Clearance should:

  1. Use the clearance only for legitimate purposes;
  2. Protect the confidentiality of the document;
  3. Avoid treating a mere hit as proof of guilt;
  4. Allow the applicant to explain;
  5. Distinguish between pending cases and convictions;
  6. Consider relevance to the job;
  7. Comply with labor and data privacy principles;
  8. Avoid unnecessary retention or disclosure of sensitive records.

An applicant’s theft-related history may be relevant, but fairness requires context.

XXXIV. Remedies and Next Steps

A person dealing with a theft-related NBI problem may consider the following remedies:

1. NBI Verification

Complete the verification process and determine whether the hit truly refers to the applicant.

2. Court Verification

Check the court where the case was filed. Obtain certified records.

3. Prosecutor Verification

If the matter was handled at preliminary investigation, obtain the prosecutor’s resolution.

4. Warrant Resolution

If a warrant exists, consult a lawyer and take proper legal action.

5. Record Updating

If the case was dismissed, acquitted, or otherwise resolved, request that records be updated or corrected.

6. Legal Representation

If there is a pending theft case, warrant, or conviction, legal counsel is strongly advisable.

7. Employment Explanation

If applying for work, prepare a concise and truthful explanation supported by documents.

8. Data Privacy Remedies

If inaccurate or excessive personal data is being processed, consider invoking data privacy rights through proper channels.

XXXV. Frequently Asked Questions

1. Will a theft case automatically appear in my NBI Clearance?

Not automatically. It depends on whether there is a formal record in the relevant database, such as a pending case, warrant, or conviction.

2. Does an NBI hit mean I am guilty of theft?

No. A hit only means there is a possible record match requiring verification.

3. Can a dismissed theft case still cause an NBI hit?

Yes. A dismissed case may still cause a hit if records are not updated or if verification is needed.

4. Can I work if I have a theft hit?

Possibly. It depends on the employer, the nature of the job, and whether the hit is due to a pending case, dismissed case, mistaken identity, or conviction.

5. Can a theft conviction be erased?

Philippine law does not generally provide automatic expungement in the same way some foreign jurisdictions do. Records may be corrected, updated, or affected by legal remedies depending on the circumstances.

6. What if the theft record belongs to someone with the same name?

You should undergo verification and provide identity documents proving that you are not the person in the record.

7. What if I settled the theft case with the complainant?

Settlement does not automatically erase or dismiss a criminal case. You must verify whether the prosecutor or court formally dismissed the case.

8. What if I have an old theft conviction?

The record may still appear. You should obtain proof of completion of sentence, probation, or other legal relief, and consult counsel regarding possible remedies.

9. Can an employer reject me because of a theft record?

An employer may consider criminal history if relevant to the job, but should distinguish between a mere hit, a pending case, a dismissed case, an acquittal, and a final conviction.

10. Should I disclose a theft case?

It depends on what is being asked. Read the exact wording. A question about convictions is different from a question about pending cases or prior charges.

XXXVI. Conclusion

NBI Clearance issues involving theft records require careful legal and factual analysis. A theft-related hit does not automatically mean guilt, conviction, or permanent disqualification. It may be caused by a namesake, a pending case, a dismissed complaint, an outdated record, an acquittal, a warrant, or an actual conviction.

The most important step is to determine the exact nature of the record. Once identified, the applicant can secure court or prosecutor documents, request verification or correction, resolve any pending warrant or case, and provide a fair explanation when necessary.

For employers and institutions, an NBI Clearance should be used responsibly. A person should not be judged solely on the basis of a hit without verification. For applicants, honesty, documentation, and timely legal action are essential.

Theft records can have serious consequences in the Philippines, especially for employment, overseas work, government service, licensing, and immigration. But the legal effect depends on the status of the case, the accuracy of the record, and the remedies available under Philippine law.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login