NBI Clearance Hits After Dismissed Cases in the Philippines

I. What is an NBI Clearance and What is a “Hit”?

An NBI Clearance is a government-issued document from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) certifying whether a person has any derogatory record in the NBI’s criminal and investigative databases. It is widely used for:

  • Local employment
  • Overseas employment (POEA/DMW requirements)
  • Visa applications
  • Firearms licenses, government appointments, professional licenses
  • Business permits and other clearances

When you apply for an NBI clearance, your personal data (name, aliases, date of birth, etc.) are run against the NBI’s database of:

  • Criminal cases (filed in court)
  • Prosecutor’s cases (inquest or preliminary investigation)
  • Warrants of arrest
  • Intelligence and investigative data from law enforcement agencies

If there is any match or possible match, your application will show a “HIT.” This does not automatically mean you are guilty or even that you personally had a case; it may simply mean that:

  • You have a namesake who has a case; or
  • You personally were involved in a case (complainant, accused, respondent, etc.); or
  • You previously had a case which is now dismissed or terminated, but still remains on record.

When there is a HIT, the NBI usually asks the applicant to come back after a few working days (or more) so they can verify the record and determine whether the applicant can be issued a clearance and what remark (if any) to reflect.

II. Why Do Dismissed Cases Still Cause NBI Hits?

A common expectation is: “My case was dismissed / I was acquitted, so my NBI should already be clean.” In practice, that is not always what happens.

1. Nature of NBI Records

The NBI’s primary mandate is investigative and law-enforcement support. As such, its databases are historical: they keep records of:

  • Complaints filed
  • Cases investigated
  • Prosecutorial resolutions
  • Court decisions, including dismissals and acquittals

Even if a case has been dismissed, the fact that the case once existed may remain in the NBI system, because:

  • It is part of the case history; and
  • Historical records can still be relevant for law enforcement and intelligence.

2. Data Flow and Administrative Lag

NBI records are based on inputs from:

  • Police and other law-enforcement agencies
  • Prosecutor’s offices
  • Courts

There can be delays or inconsistencies in updating the NBI system when a case is dismissed, archived, provisionally dismissed, or when a warrant is recalled. Sometimes:

  • The dismissal order is not immediately transmitted;
  • The data entry may not yet reflect the dismissal;
  • Only partial updates are made (e.g., case status updated in court records, but not matched in NBI’s database).

As a result, the initial system check still flags a HIT, triggering manual verification.

3. Law Does Not Automatically Erase History

Philippine law does not have a general “expungement” statute that completely deletes adult criminal records just because a case was dismissed or an accused was acquitted (juvenile records are treated differently under special laws).

In most instances, what the law requires is:

  • Accuracy (the record must correctly state that the case was dismissed/terminated); and
  • Fairness and proportionality in the use and disclosure of such data (e.g., under data privacy principles).

Thus, an NBI record may still show that a case once existed, but it should show the correct final status—e.g., “Case Dismissed,” “Acquitted,” “Case Archived,” etc., depending on internal notation.

III. Legal Framework: Rights and Limitations

Several legal sources frame how dismissed cases should be handled in relation to NBI records:

1. Constitution: Presumption of Innocence and Privacy

The 1987 Constitution guarantees:

  • The presumption of innocence until proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt;
  • The right to due process and equal protection;
  • The right to privacy and to be secure in one’s person, papers, and effects;
  • The right to information, and correspondingly, the obligation of the State to handle information lawfully.

While the Constitution does not explicitly talk about NBI clearances, these provisions underpin the requirement that criminal records must be used and interpreted carefully and fairly, especially where the case did not result in a conviction.

2. NBI Charter and Related Laws

The NBI is created and governed by its charter (originally Republic Act No. 157 and later amendments, including RA 10867). Its role includes:

  • Investigating crimes;
  • Maintaining a centralized data system on criminal records and related information;
  • Issuing clearances upon request.

In doing so, the NBI is expected to:

  • Keep records for legitimate law-enforcement and public-interest purposes;
  • Observe confidentiality where applicable;
  • Abide by other laws, like the Data Privacy Act.

3. Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173)

The Data Privacy Act (DPA) and its rules apply to government agencies that process personal information, including sensitive personal information related to crimes. Key principles and rights include:

  • Legitimate Purpose – Law enforcement and clearance issuance are recognized lawful purposes, but the collection and use of data must be proportional and appropriate to those purposes.
  • Transparency – The data subject must be informed of how their data is used.
  • Accuracy – Personal data must be accurate, relevant, and kept up to date where necessary.
  • Retention – Data should not be retained longer than necessary, subject to law-enforcement and archival needs.

The DPA grants individuals rights such as:

  • Right to be informed – How your data is collected and used.
  • Right to access – To know what information about you is held and processed.
  • Right to rectification – To correct or update inaccurate or incomplete data.
  • Right to erasure or blocking – Under certain conditions, to suspend, withdraw, or order the blocking, removal, or destruction of personal data, particularly when it is outdated, erroneous, or unlawfully obtained.

Applied to NBI clearance hits:

  • You generally cannot force the NBI to erase lawful and necessary law-enforcement records;
  • But you can insist that any record accurately reflect that a case was dismissed, that a warrant is recalled, or that you were not the person involved;
  • You may seek annotation, correction, or updating of records in line with the DPA.

IV. What Types of Dismissed Cases Can Still Appear as Hits?

Not all dismissals are alike. Some common situations:

1. Prosecutor-Level Dismissal (No Case Filed in Court)

Example: A criminal complaint was filed with the prosecutor’s office, but the prosecutor dismissed the complaint for lack of probable cause.

Even if no case reached the court, the complaint and resolution may have been reported to or stored in databases accessed by the NBI. This can lead to a HIT, especially if:

  • Your name was entered in “derogatory” or investigative lists; or
  • The system flags any record where you were subject of a criminal complaint.

In principle, the NBI should be able to annotate that no case was filed and that the complaint was dismissed at the prosecutor level.

2. Court Case Dismissed After Filing

Example scenarios:

  • The case was dismissed before arraignment;
  • The case was dismissed after arraignment, with or without prejudice;
  • You were acquitted after trial;
  • The case was provisionally dismissed for failure to prosecute;
  • The case was dismissed because the offense has prescribed;
  • The case was dismissed due to a settlement, such as in certain crimes that are subject to compromise.

In such situations, the NBI may still have an entry that a case was filed against you in a particular court. That may produce a HIT, but upon verification, the NBI should see:

  • The case number;
  • The name of the court;
  • The final disposition (e.g., “dismissed,” “acquitted”).

Ideally, your clearance, once processed, will be issued with no adverse notation, or at most with an internal annotation that you have been cleared due to dismissal/acquittal.

3. Archived or Provisionally Dismissed Cases

Sometimes, cases are archived (e.g., accused at large) or provisionally dismissed subject to certain conditions. These do not always mean the case is dead; it may be revived.

In NBI’s system, such cases may definitely cause a HIT, and the NBI may be hesitant to reflect them as fully “cleared,” depending on the exact wording of the court’s order and whether the case can still be reinstated.

V. Practical Process: What Happens After a HIT?

When your NBI application shows a HIT:

  1. Initial Notice

    • The NBI will not immediately issue your clearance.
    • You are told that there is a HIT and asked to return on a scheduled date, or you may be directed to a Quality Control / Verification section.

  2. Verification by NBI

    • The NBI staff will investigate why the system flagged your record.

    • They will check whether the HIT is due to:

      • A namesake;
      • A pending case or warrant;
      • A dismissed/terminated case;
      • Some other derogatory record.

  3. Requests for Supporting Documents

    If the HIT is linked to a case involving you (not just a namesake), you may be asked to present:

    • Valid IDs to establish identity;

    • Certified true copies of:

      • Court orders of dismissal/acquittal;
      • Prosecutor’s resolution of dismissal;
      • Orders recalling warrants;
      • Certificates of finality, if applicable.

    This is crucial because the NBI needs official proof that the case has been terminated or that you are not the person sought.

  4. Annotation or Updating of Record

    Upon satisfying itself that:

    • You are the same person involved in the record; and
    • The case has been properly dismissed or terminated,

    the NBI may:

    • Annotate your record as cleared due to dismissal/acquittal;
    • Update internal fields to show the correct status;
    • Proceed to issue the NBI clearance.

    Sometimes, even after a dismissal, your name will still trigger a HIT in future applications, but the verification should become much faster once the NBI’s system is fully updated and annotated.

VI. Can You Demand Complete Deletion of a Dismissed Case from NBI Records?

This is a key question.

1. General Rule: No Automatic Right to Total Erasure

There is no general law in the Philippines that automatically wipes out all records of adult dismissed or acquitted cases from law-enforcement databases.

The State has a legitimate interest in keeping records of:

  • Investigations;
  • Court proceedings;
  • Outcomes of cases (including dismissals and acquittals).

What you can insist on is:

  • Accuracy – That the record shows the true final status;
  • Proper use – That the record is not used or disclosed beyond lawful purposes (e.g., law enforcement and valid clearance requests).

2. Data Privacy Angle

Under the Data Privacy Act, you may invoke:

  • Right to rectification – To correct inaccurate or misleading entries.

  • Right to blocking/erasure – In limited cases, for example, if the data is:

    • No longer necessary for the declared and legitimate purpose;
    • Unlawfully obtained; or
    • Erroneous and causes or may cause serious harm.

However, because law-enforcement records usually fall under special lawful grounds, the NBI and other agencies will often argue that they must retain such records for public-interest reasons. In practice, this means:

  • Annotation and correction are more realistic than outright deletion.
  • A demand for total erasure is rarely granted in law-enforcement databases, except in very narrow or special circumstances.

3. Special Case: Children in Conflict with the Law (CICL)

For minors, special protection laws apply (e.g., Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act). Records of children in conflict with the law are generally confidential and subject to sealing or limited access.

This is different from the typical adult scenario and may justify stricter limits on record retention and disclosure.

VII. Effects on Employment, Travel, and Licensing

1. Local Employment

Many employers require NBI clearances. If your clearance ultimately shows “No Derogatory Record” (or is issued without adverse notation) after the HIT is resolved, most employers will simply treat it as a clean clearance.

However, if the employer asks why you had a HIT or sees remnants of a dismissed case (for example, when they require additional certifications from court), you may need to:

  • Explain the background;
  • Provide documents showing dismissal or acquittal.

2. Overseas Employment and Visas

For overseas employment and visas, foreign embassies or immigration authorities may:

  • Accept the NBI clearance as evidence of no current conviction;
  • Sometimes ask more detailed explanation if they learn of a past case, even if dismissed.

In such cases, having on hand:

  • Certified court/prosecutor documents;
  • Clear proof of final dismissal or acquittal;

is very helpful.

3. Professional and Government Licenses

Government agencies and Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) may request NBI clearances. If you have a properly annotated and cleared record (case dismissed/acquitted), this typically will not, by itself, bar you from:

  • Taking board exams;
  • Obtaining professional licenses;
  • Being appointed to government positions, unless disqualification grounds apply for other reasons.

VIII. Practical Steps if You Have a HIT Due to a Dismissed Case

If you know you had a previous case (or complaint) that was dismissed or resulted in acquittal, the following practical steps can help:

  1. Secure Official Documents Early

    Before or immediately after applying for NBI clearance, obtain:

    • Certified true copy of the court order dismissing the case or acquitting you;
    • Any certificate of finality if available;
    • In case of prosecutor-level dismissal, the prosecutor’s resolution;
    • If applicable, the order recalling a warrant.

  2. Bring Multiple Copies

    It is often helpful to have several certified copies on hand, in case:

    • The NBI needs to retain a copy;
    • Your future employer or a foreign embassy asks for documentation.

  3. Visit NBI Quality Control / Verification Sections

    When your application shows a HIT, follow instructions to:

    • Appear personally;
    • Present your IDs and certified documents;
    • Cooperate with any additional verification.

  4. Request Annotation / Updating of Records

    Politely but firmly request that your records be:

    • Updated to reflect that the case is dismissed / acquitted;
    • Annotated so that future applications can be promptly cleared.

  5. Keep Your Receipts and Reference Numbers

    Keep a record of:

    • Dates you visited NBI;
    • Any logbook entries or transaction references;
    • Names or positions of officers you coordinated with (for your own documentation and possible future complaints if necessary).

  6. Invoking Data Privacy Rights (if needed)

    If you believe NBI records are inaccurate, outdated, or unfairly harming you, you may:

    • Write a formal letter invoking your rights under the Data Privacy Act, requesting correction and/or annotation;
    • If unresolved, consider filing a complaint with the National Privacy Commission (NPC) or seeking assistance of counsel.

IX. Common Misconceptions

  1. “Dismissed case = auto-clean NBI record”

    • Not necessarily. The record may still exist, but should show correct final status.

  2. “HIT always means I am a criminal”

    • No. HIT can be due to namesakes or historical records of dismissed cases.

  3. “I can demand erasure of all records of my dismissed case”

    • Rarely. You can demand accuracy and proper annotation, but law-enforcement databases usually retain historical records.

  4. “NBI refuses to clear me; I can’t do anything”

    • You have recourse to:

      • Present more complete documentation;
      • Invoke data privacy rights;
      • Seek help from a lawyer or, in extreme cases, bring the matter to court or to oversight bodies.

X. When to Consult a Lawyer

You should seriously consider consulting counsel if:

  • The NBI insists you have a pending case or warrant that you believe has already been dismissed or recalled;
  • Your NBI clearance still carries derogatory information despite presenting complete documents;
  • You are losing significant opportunities (job offers, visas, licenses) due to how your NBI record is being interpreted;
  • You intend to pursue remedies under the Data Privacy Act, or to file any judicial action (e.g., a petition to correct or clarify criminal records).

A lawyer can:

  • Review the actual court and prosecutor records;
  • Communicate formally with the NBI and other agencies;
  • Advise you on whether to escalate to the courts or to the National Privacy Commission.

XI. Summary

  • An NBI HIT simply means there is a match or possible match between your personal data and a record in the NBI’s databases.
  • Dismissed or acquitted cases can still cause hits because the NBI maintains historical law-enforcement records.
  • Philippine law does not automatically erase adult criminal records after dismissal; instead, it requires that records be accurate, lawfully used, and, where justified, corrected or annotated.
  • You have rights under the Constitution and the Data Privacy Act to demand accuracy, fair processing, and, in some situations, blocking or erasure of data.
  • Practically, the most effective course is to secure official court/prosecutor documents, present them to the NBI for verification and annotation, and keep your own records in case further issues arise.
  • If irregularities persist or your rights are seriously affected, legal assistance is strongly advisable.

This overview is for general information about NBI clearance hits arising from dismissed cases in the Philippine context and should not be treated as a substitute for specific legal advice on an individual situation.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login