Neighbor Right of Way Fencing Own Land Philippines

A comprehensive legal overview

I. Overview

Disputes about “sarili kong lupa ‘to” versus “daan namin ‘yan” are among the most common neighborhood conflicts in the Philippines. They usually revolve around two powerful but sometimes clashing rights:

  1. The owner’s right to fence and fully enclose his land, and
  2. A neighbor’s right of way when his property is landlocked or has no adequate access to a public road.

This article explains, in Philippine legal context, how those rights work, when a fence is lawful or unlawful, and what remedies are available when a neighbor blocks a path.

This is general legal information, not a substitute for advice from a Philippine lawyer who can review your actual titles, plans, and facts.

II. Legal Framework

Several legal sources are relevant:

  1. Civil Code of the Philippines

    • Provisions on ownership (including the right to enclose land).
    • Provisions on easements/servitudes (especially right of way).
    • Provisions on party walls, boundaries, and fences.

  2. National Building Code (PD 1096 and its IRR)

    • Requires building/fence permits.
    • Sets structural and safety requirements; local building officials implement.

  3. Local Government Ordinances

    • Zoning (residential, commercial, agricultural).
    • Maximum fence height, materials, setback requirements.
    • Permit procedures and penalties.

  4. Katarungang Pambarangay Law

    • Requires barangay conciliation for most neighbor disputes, including right of way and fences, before going to court.

  5. Supreme Court decisions

    • Interpret when a right of way exists.
    • Clarify what counts as “no adequate outlet,” “least prejudice,” etc.
    • Clarify when fences or gates are allowed over an existing right of way.

III. The Owner’s Right to Fence His Own Land

1. General rule: The owner can enclose his property

Under the Civil Code, the owner has the full right to enjoy and dispose of his property. Part of that is the right to enclose or fence it with walls, ditches, hedges, or other means, so long as he respects existing servitudes (easements) and special laws.

In plain language:

  • You can normally:

    • Put up a perimeter fence or wall.
    • Put a gate and even lock it.
    • Restrict strangers from passing through your land.

  • But you cannot:

    • Destroy or block a lawfully existing easement of right of way.
    • Build in violation of building codes or local ordinances.
    • Create a nuisance (e.g., dangerous, unstable structure).

2. Fencing permits and local limits

While civil law recognizes your right to fence, public law (Building Code, ordinances) regulates how you fence:

  • You usually need a building/fence permit for concrete or substantial walls.

  • LGUs commonly regulate:

    • Maximum height (often around 2 meters for residential fences, more for corner/special lots, but this varies by LGU).
    • Materials (e.g., no barbed wire facing public areas, or restrictions in subdivisions).
    • Whether the fence may sit exactly on the boundary line or must observe a setback.

Building without a permit can lead to:

  • Stop-work orders
  • Fines
  • Even demolition if non-compliant

But note: Permit issues are different from neighbor’s rights; a fence might be illegal for lack of permit but still not create a right of way for the neighbor.

3. Fences, boundaries, and party walls

The Civil Code also recognizes party walls—walls built on the dividing line and jointly owned by neighbors in certain cases (e.g., agreed upon, presumed in some urban settings, or built in common).

Key practical points:

  • A wall entirely inside your titled lot is yours alone.

  • A wall exactly on the boundary may be:

    • Your wall,
    • Your neighbor’s wall, or
    • A party wall (co-owned), depending on how and by whom it was built and what has been agreed or presumed by law.

  • Party walls are governed by special rules on:

    • Who can raise the height.
    • How to share maintenance costs.
    • Whether openings (windows, vents) are allowed.

Boundary location is ultimately a technical question to be resolved by survey/geodetic engineer and supported by titles and subdivision plans.

IV. Easements of Right of Way: Basic Concepts

1. What is an easement?

An easement (servitude) is a burden imposed upon one property (the servient estate) for the benefit of another property (the dominant estate).

For right of way:

  • The dominant estate is the land that needs access.
  • The servient estate is the land through which the passage runs.

The right belongs to the land, not just the person. When the property is sold, the easement generally follows the land.

2. Types of right of way

  1. Voluntary (conventional) easement

    • Created by agreement (e.g., in a deed, contract, or subdivision plan).
    • May be annotated on the title.
    • Terms (location, width, who maintains, etc.) can be tailored by the parties.

  2. Legal/compulsory easement of right of way (Civil Code)

    • Granted by law to the owner of a property who has no adequate outlet to a public road.
    • Can be demanded judicially if the neighbor refuses.
    • Requires payment of indemnity to the neighbor.

  3. Easement created by title vs by prescription

    • The Civil Code distinguishes continuous (working without human act) vs discontinuous (need human intervention) easements.
    • Right of way is discontinuous because you need to walk or drive to use it.
    • Discontinuous easements cannot be acquired by prescription, only by title (law, contract, court judgment).
    • So, long-time use alone of a footpath, without a contract or court order, does not usually create a legal easement of right of way. It may only show tolerance.

V. When Can You Demand a Legal Right of Way?

Under the Civil Code provisions on compulsory right of way (often summarized as Articles 649 onwards), you generally must prove these requisites:

  1. Your property is surrounded (landlocked)

    • Your estate has no adequate outlet to a public highway, except through neighboring lands.
    • Being “surrounded” may include your own other lots plus others’ lots.

  2. The existing outlet (if any) is not adequate

    • “Not adequate” means:

      • Impractical or extremely difficult for normal use of the property.
      • So inconvenient or expensive that it defeats the property’s normal use.

    • Courts distinguish mere inconvenience (not enough) from real inadequacy.

      • Example of mere inconvenience: Access exists but is a bit longer or harder to traverse.
      • Example of inadequacy: Extremely steep, flooded most of the time, or impossible for vehicles when the property is intended for residential/commercial use.

  3. The right of way must be located at the point least prejudicial to the servient estate

    • The law favors the neighbor whose land will be burdened.

    • Among possible routes:

      • Choose the one that causes least damage or least disruption to the servient land’s use.
      • If there are alternatives, you cannot insist on the path that goes straight through your neighbor’s prime area if a slightly longer but less damaging path exists.

  4. Shortest distance to the public road, all things equal

    • If several routes would cause similar prejudice, choose the shortest path.

  5. Payment of proper indemnity

    • Legal right of way is not free.

    • You must pay:

      • The value of the area taken for the passage; and
      • Damages for any other injury caused (e.g., crops destroyed, reduced value).

    • This indemnity is normally determined by the court if there is no agreement.

VI. When a Neighbor’s Fence Becomes Unlawful Obstruction

The rule is simple in principle: an owner may fence his land, “without prejudice to servitudes constituted thereon.”

1. If a valid easement exists

A fence is unlawful (or at least must be modified) if:

  • There is a registered or annotated right of way in favor of the neighbor; or
  • There is a clear written agreement establishing a right of way; or
  • A final court decision has established such right; or
  • A legal right of way was already judicially fixed, or the facts satisfy all legal requisites for compulsory right of way and the court grants it.

In those cases:

  • The owner of the servient estate cannot simply close or block the passage.

  • If he fences his land:

    • The easement must be preserved.
    • He may fence around the corridor, or
    • Place a gate, but must not render the use of the easement impossible or unreasonably difficult.

2. If the path was only by tolerance (no legal easement)

If people have been passing through a property purely by permission or tolerance, without:

  • Contract,
  • Title annotation, or
  • Court order,

the general rule is:

  • The owner may withdraw his tolerance and legally fence off the path.
  • The users of the path cannot claim a legal easement based only on long use.

This is a common source of conflict: neighbors assume “matagal na naming daan ‘yan” automatically gives them a legal right of way. For discontinuous easements like right of way, the law says otherwise.

However:

  • If the property is truly landlocked, the appropriate remedy is usually to demand a compulsory right of way, not to insist that the owner cannot fence.

3. Gates, keys, and reasonable regulation

Even when a right of way exists, the servient owner retains ownership. Courts have allowed servient owners to:

  • Put up gates or doors for security.
  • Impose reasonable regulations (e.g., opening hours if consistent with the nature of the easement).

But these measures:

  • Must not defeat the purpose of the right of way.
  • Must not unreasonably restrict the dominant estate’s access.

For example:

  • If the easement is for vehicular access to a residence, the servient owner cannot lock the gate permanently during hours when occupants need to enter/exit, unless arrangements are made (keys, remote control, etc.).

VII. Determining Location and Width of the Easement

1. Location

If parties disagree, the court will determine the path based on:

  • Least prejudice to servient estate; and
  • Shortest route to the public road.

The route might:

  • Follow an existing path, or
  • Be shifted to another edge of the property if that is fairer and less damaging.

2. Width

The Civil Code and jurisprudence generally peg the width at what is reasonably necessary for the intended use:

  • Footpath only → narrower.
  • Residential access for cars → typically wide enough for a vehicle.
  • Agricultural/commercial use → may require wider paths for trucks or equipment.

Courts may also consider the type of vehicles commonly used and the terrain.

VIII. Fencing Along or Beside a Right of Way

Even if a right of way exists, the servient owner may wish to fence his remaining land for privacy and security.

1. Is fencing beside the easement allowed?

Generally yes, provided that:

  • The easement’s width is maintained.
  • The entrance/exit of the easement to the public road is not blocked.
  • Any gate on the easement is reasonably usable (not always locked, or keys provided).

2. Can the dominant owner fence the easement?

The dominant owner typically has the right to do works necessary for the use and preservation of the easement, at his expense, unless otherwise agreed. This may include:

  • Paving or gravelling the path.
  • Installing drainage.
  • In some cases, putting up small protective barriers.

However:

  • Full fencing that effectively turns the easement into a private enclosed driveway may require agreement with the servient owner, especially if the fence sits on the servient land.

3. Cost of maintenance

Unless otherwise agreed:

  • Dominant estate usually bears the cost of works needed for the use and preservation of the easement.
  • If the servient estate also benefits from the improvements, costs may be shared proportionally.

IX. Special Situations

1. When the seller creates his own landlocked lot

If a landowner sells a portion of his land in such a way that the buyer’s lot is left without access to a public road, the law tends to be stricter on the seller:

  • The buyer is usually entitled to a right of way through the remaining land of the seller, as the seller caused the landlocking.
  • Courts often favor an access route that traverses the seller’s remaining property.

2. Subdivisions and right of way

In subdivisions:

  • Internal roads are usually designated in the approved subdivision plan.
  • Owners of interior lots are expected to use these internal roads.
  • Fencing by a neighbor across a designated road lot or pathway is normally unlawful.

Problems arise when:

  • The subdivision is informal or not fully developed.
  • Internal roads are not yet opened, and neighbors create informal paths through private lots.

3. Agricultural lands and tenancy issues

If the land is tenanted or under agrarian laws:

  • DAR (Department of Agrarian Reform) jurisdiction may overlap with regular courts.
  • Tenants or beneficiaries may have special rights to access farm lots.
  • But the fundamental logic of easements—no adequate outlet, least prejudice, indemnity—still applies.

X. Remedies and Procedures When a Fence Blocks Access

If a neighbor fences his land and blocks your access, your options depend on whether you already have a clear easement or not.

1. If a clear easement already exists

Examples:

  • Annotated on titles.
  • Written contract.
  • Final court judgment granting right of way.

You may:

  1. Send a formal demand letter

    • Ask the neighbor to remove or adjust the fence to restore the passage.
    • Attach copies of titles, contracts, or court decisions.

  2. Barangay conciliation

    • For neighbors in the same city/municipality, Lupong Tagapamayapa mediation is usually mandatory before filing suit.

  3. File a court case if unresolved

    • Remedies may include:

      • Injunction to stop or undo obstruction.
      • Specific performance (to honor the easement).
      • Damages for loss of use, expenses, etc.

    • In some urgent cases, you may ask for a TRO/preliminary injunction to restore access while the case is pending.

2. If there is no established easement but you have no adequate outlet

You may:

  1. Document landlocking

    • Secure a survey plan and sketch from a geodetic engineer showing your lot and surrounding lots.
    • Collect titles, tax declarations, approved subdivision plans, and photos.

  2. Negotiate a voluntary easement

    • Offer to:

      • Pay a reasonable indemnity,
      • Specify the route and width,
      • Take on maintenance.

    • Sometimes this can be resolved through amicable settlement or notarized easement agreement, then annotated on titles.

  3. Barangay conciliation

    • Bring the dispute to the barangay, propose compromise terms.

  4. File a court action for compulsory right of way

    • Court will:

      • Determine if the legal requisites are present.
      • Fix the location and width.
      • Determine the indemnity payable.

    • If the neighbor has already fenced the land, the court can order opening of the passage, even with payment of compensation.

3. If you actually have another adequate outlet

If you have another reasonable route to a public road (even if a bit longer or less convenient), the court may:

  • Deny a compulsory right of way; and
  • Uphold your neighbor’s right to keep his fence.

XI. Practical Tips for Landowners

A. For an owner who wants to fence his land

  1. Check your title and subdivision plan

    • Look for:

      • Any road lots or designated right of way.
      • Any annotations (e.g., “Subject to easement of right of way in favor of Lot ___”).

  2. Ask a surveyor to mark your boundaries

    • Avoid accidentally fencing beyond your property, or fencing over a road lot or easement.

  3. Check local ordinances and get a fence permit

    • This avoids having your fence questioned by the city/municipality.

  4. Identify any long-used paths

    • If neighbors have been using a portion as a path:

      • Decide whether to formalize an easement (with compensation), or
      • Give sufficient notice if you intend to close it.

    • Be prepared that neighbors might claim a compulsory right of way if they are truly landlocked.

  5. Consider reasonable accommodations

    • Providing a gate and key or alternative passage may:

      • Reduce conflict.
      • Help avoid litigation.

B. For a neighbor whose access is blocked by a fence

  1. Do not assume that long usage alone is a legal right of way

    • Check:

      • Your deed and title,
      • Subdivision plans,
      • Any written agreements.

  2. Gather evidence of landlocking and lack of adequate outlet

    • Photos, videos, drone shots if available.
    • Survey maps showing distances to public roads.

  3. Talk first, write second

    • Try to negotiate a peaceful arrangement.
    • If that fails, send a polite but firm written demand referencing your legal basis.

  4. Go to the barangay

    • Barangay mediation is usually required.
    • Some disputes are resolved here through amicable settlement.

  5. Consider a court case for compulsory right of way

    • Be prepared to:

      • Pay indemnity.
      • Accept the route fixed by the court (which may not be your preferred older path).

XII. Common Misconceptions

  1. “Matagal na naming daan ‘yan, so akin na ang karapatan.”

    • Not necessarily. Right of way is discontinuous, so prescription alone does not usually create a legal easement.

  2. “Kahit landlocked ka, hindi kita papadaanin, lupa ko ‘to.”

    • The Civil Code allows a compulsory right of way if the requisites are met and indemnity is paid.

  3. “May fence permit ako, so pwede kong harangan kahit anong gusto ko.”

    • A fence permit does not override civil rights such as a pre-existing easement of right of way.

  4. “Kapag may easement, parang akin na rin ‘yung daan na ‘yan.”

    • No. Ownership of the land remains with the servient estate; the dominant estate has only a limited use right.

XIII. Conclusion

In Philippine law, both of these principles are true at the same time:

  • A landowner has a strong right to fence and fully control his property; and
  • A landlocked neighbor has a strong legal claim to obtain a right of way, subject to strict conditions and payment of indemnity.

Conflicts arise when people rely on custom or “tagal na” usage instead of checking titles, plans, and the Civil Code. The safest path is usually:

  1. Clarify legal rights (ownership, easements, landlocking).
  2. Explore fair, written agreements.
  3. Use barangay processes actively.
  4. Resort to court only if necessary, with proper technical and legal support.

Understanding these rules helps neighbors protect their own land without trampling on the legitimate right of way of others—and, ideally, avoid a full-blown barangay or courtroom war over a fence and a path.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login