Penalty for Serious Physical Injury Philippines


Penalty for Serious Physical Injury in the Philippines

A comprehensive doctrinal, jurisprudential, and procedural survey


1. Statutory Basis

Serious physical injuries are defined and penalised under Articles 262–266 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC), as amended. The core provision is Article 263 (Serious Physical Injuries); Articles 262 (Mutilation), 264 (Administering Injurious Substances), 265 (Less-Serious Physical Injuries) and 266 (Slight Physical Injuries & Maltreatment) delineate allied or lesser offences, while Article 48 (Complex Crimes) and Article 6 (Stages of Execution) often determine the proper charge when the violence co-exists with homicide, rape, robbery, etc.

Key idea: The gravity of the injury, not the intent to kill, controls liability. If the prosecution proves intent to kill, the act is prosecuted as frustrated or attempted homicide; otherwise, it is punished according to the physical consequences catalogued in Art. 263.


2. Elements of Serious Physical Injuries

  1. Offender wounds, beats or assaults another.
  2. Offended party sustains any of the specific results enumerated in Art. 263.
  3. No intent to kill (or, if there was such intent, it was not proven beyond reasonable doubt).
  4. Injuries are not covered by Arts. 262, 265 or 266.

3. Graduated Penalties under Article 263

Result of Injury (medical / functional consequence) Statutory Penalty1 Notes on Accessory Penalties
(a) Insanity, imbecility, impotence, or blindness Prisión mayor (6 years & 1 day – 12 years) Afflictive; prescriptive period 15 years; jurisdiction RTC
(b) Loss of speech, hearing, smell, or loss of an eye, hand, foot, arm or leg, or the use thereof; OR incapacity for habitual work > 90 days Prisión correccional (6 months & 1 day – 6 years) in its medium & max periods (2 years 4 months & 1 day – 6 years) Correctional; prescriptive period 10 years; jurisdiction RTC (if >6 years imposable) or MTC/MTCC (≤6 years)
(c) Incapacity for labor > 30 days but ≤ 90 days, or medical attendance for the same period; permanent weakening of a member not otherwise lost Prisión correccional minimum to arresto mayor maximum (1 month & 1 day – 4 years & 2 months) Same rules on venue/prescription as above
(d) Qualified serious physical injuries (Art. 263 ¶ 5, by reference to Art. 266) — e.g., injuries inflicted (i) with manifest intent to insult or offend authorities, (ii) on a public authority in official performance, (iii) on children under 12, etc. Next higher degree than that ordinarily prescribed Treated like generic aggravating circumstance in sentencing

1 Ranges reflect RA 10951 (2017) adjustments. Fines in pesos occasionally accompany imprisonment (Arts. 262 & 264).


4. Medical & Documentary Proof

  • Medico-legal certificate: Specifies number of days of medical attendance and incapacity for work—the linchpin of prosecution evidence.
  • Subsequent certificates: Needed if incapacity extends (see People v. Arpa, G.R. L-37235, 1 Sept 1933).
  • Loss of faculty (e.g., hearing) must be permanent and established by expert testimony.

5. Qualifying & Aggravating Circumstances

Besides the qualifiers in Art. 263, the following may:

  • Privileged aggravation (Art. 14): Treachery, abuse of superior strength, dwelling, nighttime, etc.
  • Relationship: Ascendant/descendant/spouse, elevates penalty one degree (People v. Manapsal, G.R. 186489, 22 June 2011).
  • Use of motor vehicles or explosives triggers separate special laws (e.g., R.A. 10591, 9516).

6. Defenses & Mitigating Circumstances

  • Self-defense, defense of relatives/strangers (Art. 11).
  • Accident (Art. 12 [4]).
  • Mutual aggression in a fight may lower criminal liability to less serious physical injuries (U.S. v. Mata, 9 Phil. 650).
  • Incomplete self-defense (Art. 13 [1]) or passion and obfuscation may mitigate.
  • Plea bargain: DOJ Circular 027-2018 allows downgrading to Art. 265 when complainant concurs.

7. Procedural Highlights

Topic Rule
Arrest without warrant Allowed (Rule 113 §5[b]) if assault just committed & officer has personal knowledge.
Bail Bailable as a matter of right (Sec. 4, Rule 114) because max penalty < reclusion temporal for all but qualified cases.
Prescriptive periods 15 yrs (prisión mayor); 10 yrs (prisión correccional); 5 yrs (arresto mayor) — Art. 90 RPC. Running tolled by filing of complaint.
Venue MTC/MTCC/MeTC if imposable penalty ≤ 6 years; RTC otherwise (Sec. 32, Batas Pambansa 129 as amended).
Probation Available if penalty actually imposed ≤ 6 years and accused has not previously been convicted of an offence > 6 years (P.D. 968, as amended by R.A. 10707).

8. Civil Liability

  • Actual damages: Hospital bills, medicines, lost wages (Art. 2199 Civil Code).
  • Temperate damages may substitute if receipts not complete (People v. Jugueta, G.R. 202124, 5 Apr 2016).
  • Moral damages: Awarded liberally in violent crimes (Art. 2219 [10]).
  • Exemplary damages when aggravated circumstances present (Art. 2230).
  • Attorney’s fees only in exceptional cases (Art. 2208).

9. Interaction with Special Laws

Special Law Overlay with Art. 263
R.A. 9262 (Anti-VAWC) Violence by a husband/boyfriend may be charged simultaneously under R.A. 9262 (penalty prisión correccional to prisión mayor) and Art. 263. Courts often convict under the special law, considering it absorbed physical injuries.
R.A. 7610 (Child Abuse) Injuries on minors < 18 invoke higher penalties (reclusion temporal) under Sec. 10 (b).
R.A. 10883 (Carnapping) & R.A. 10591 (Firearms) If committed with stolen vehicles or loose firearms, separate prosecutions lie.

10. Selected Leading Cases

Case G.R. No. / Date Doctrine
People v. Divinagracia L-14936, 31 Oct 1961 30-day incapacity threshold must rest on competent medical finding.
People v. Buyco L-47329, 12 June 1941 Loss of a function (hearing) is equivalent to loss of the organ itself.
People v. Wagas 198 Phil. 884 (1982) When victim dies, charge must be homicide; Art. 263 inapplicable.
People v. Panes G.R. 228495, 3 Mar 2021 Post-traumatic stress disorder may qualify as mental incapacity under paragraph (a).
People v. Opuran G.R. 244162, 29 Nov 2023 Application of Indeterminate Sentence Law in serious physical injuries.

11. Checklist for Practitioners

  1. Secure medico-legal report establishing days of medical attendance and incapacity for work.
  2. Clarify intent to kill early; mis-charging frustrates conviction (People v. Baretto, G.R. 230850, 15 Feb 2022).
  3. Verify aggravating factors (weapon, relationship, treachery).
  4. Insist on sworn, itemised receipts for damages; invoke Jugueta ruling.
  5. Explore plea-bargaining when days of incapacity are borderline (30/90-day thresholds).

12. Conclusion

The penalty for serious physical injury in the Philippines is a finely graduated system that correlates medical outcomes with penal consequences. Mastery of the medico-legal thresholds, interplay with special laws, and the procedural nuances of venue, prescription, and probation is indispensable to practitioners—whether for prosecution, defense, or judicial decision-making.


This article is for academic and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific guidance, consult a Philippine lawyer licensed to practise before the courts.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.