Procedure for Filing an Estafa Case in the Philippines
(Comprehensive legal guide for complainants, lawyers, and researchers)
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and jurisprudence are cited as of 18 June 2025. Consult a Philippine lawyer for advice on a specific situation.
1. What Is Estafa?
Legal basis | Core idea | Typical examples |
---|---|---|
Article 315, Revised Penal Code (RPC) | Fraud or abuse of confidence causing damage or prejudice | Issuing bouncing checks, double-selling property, misappropriating entrusted money |
Article 316 | Other frauds (e.g., selling encumbered property) | Mortgage one car to several creditors |
Article 317 | Swindling a minor | Inducing minors to bet or sign documents |
Article 318 | Other deceits (catch-all) | “Budol-budol,” fake raffles |
Special Laws | E-commerce or securities fraud may be charged as cyber estafa under RA 10175 or as investment fraud under RA 11765 (Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act) |
Key element—deceit or abuse of confidence. Damage may be patrimonial (money/property) or non-patrimonial (prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation).
2. Elements by Mode (Art. 315)
Mode | Essential elements (must ALL be proved) |
---|---|
a. Abuse of confidence | (1) Money/property received in trust, on commission, or for administration; (2) Misappropriation or conversion; (3) Prejudice to owner; (4) Demand by owner (jurisprudentially persuasive but not indispensable). |
b. False pretenses/deceit (sub-modes) | i. Using fictitious name/pretending to possess power/credit; ii. Altering quality or quantity of goods; iii. Bouncing checks (B.P. 22 may be filed alternatively); iv. Other fraudulent means. Common elements: (1) False representation prior to or simultaneous with fraud; (2) Reliance thereon; (3) Damage. |
c. Fraudulent means without abuse of confidence | “Swindles” not falling under (a) or (b). |
3. Jurisdiction, Venue, and Penalty
Amount defrauded* | Court with jurisdiction | Maximum penalty (post-RA 10951 revaluation)** |
---|---|---|
≤ ₱2,000,000 | First-level court (MTCC/MTC/MCTC) | Prisión correccional (≤ 6 yrs) |
> ₱2,000,000 | Regional Trial Court (RTC) | Prisión mayor to reclusión temporal (6 yrs 1 day–20 yrs) |
Any amount via cyber means | RTC – Cybercrime Court | Penalty 1 degree higher (Art. 315 + Sec. 6, RA 10175) |
* Single act or totality rule applies (sum all amounts in a continuing crime). ** Penalties scale with amount; refer to Art. 315 as amended by RA 10951.
Venue: The crime may be filed where (a) the deceit was committed, (b) any element occurred, or (c) the demand was made/received (particularly for check estafa).
Prescription:
- Ordinary estafa: 15 years (Art. 90, RPC).
- With public funds/public officer: 20 years.
- Running is interrupted by filing of complaint-affidavit with the prosecutor.
4. Who May File & Standing
- Offended party/owner (natural or juridical).
- Duly authorized representative (board resolution, SPA).
- Law enforcement (PNP, NBI) can initiate in flagrante cases, but the prosecutor still determines probable cause.
5. Evidence Checklist
Sworn Statement / Complaint-Affidavit (narrative + elements).
Documentary proof
- Receipts, contracts, checks (front & back), demand letters, proofs of delivery
- Bank records (via subpoena duces tecum or AMLC)
- SEC/DTI documents (to show fictitious business)
Secondary evidence (texts, emails, call recordings; print with authentication).
Witnesses: executing officers, notaries, handwriting experts.
Demand letter & proof of receipt (registered mail registry or courier tracking) – persuasive for misappropriation modes.
6. Step-by-Step Procedure
A. Pre-Complaint Stage
- Gather evidence; have originals photocopied and marked.
- Draft Complaint-Affidavit (CA) and Joint-Sinumpaang-Salaysay of witnesses.
- Notarize/subscribe CA before Assistant City/Provincial Prosecutor or Admin Officer-designated.
B. Filing with the Office of the City/Provincial Prosecutor (OCP/OPP)
- File & docket: Secure reference number; pay minimal filing fee (varies by LGU; usually ₱50–₱200).
- Raffle to handling prosecutor.
C. Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112, Rules of Criminal Procedure)
Subpoena issued to respondent → 10 days to file Counter-Affidavit (CAFF).
Complainant’s Reply (optional) → 5–10 days.
Clarificatory hearing (discretionary).
Resolution: Probable cause found → Information drafted; otherwise, dismissal.
Remedies against dismissal
- Motion for Reconsideration (MR) within 15 days.
- Petition for Review to DOJ (Sec. 12, Rule 112) within remaining period or 5 days from notice of denial of MR.
D. Court Proceedings
Filing of Information: Prosecutor files with RTC or MTC, attaching supporting resolution.
Issuance of Warrant or Summons (Sec. 6, Rule 112).
Bail: Estafa is generally bailable; amount per DOJ-Bail Guide (e.g., ₱40,000–₱120,000 in lower courts; adjusted upward for large amounts or cyber aggravation).
Arraignment within 10 days of court’s acquisition of jurisdiction; plea entered.
Pre-Trial (Rule 118) – stipulations, marking of exhibits, possible plea-bargain.
Trial Proper
- Prosecution evidence → cross-examination.
- Demurrer to Evidence (Sec. 23, Rule 119) optional.
- Defense evidence.
- Formal offer of evidence; Memoranda if required.
Decision: Acquittal or conviction; civil liability adjudged.
Post-Judgment Remedies
- MR or Motion for New Trial within 15 days (Rule 121).
- Appeal: RTC decisions → CA; CA decisions → SC.
7. Civil Aspect & Restitution
- Civil action impliedly instituted unless the offended party waives, reserves, or files separately (Sec. 1(b), Rule 111).
- Restitution or Reparation may be ordered even on acquittal if the act or omission is proven.
- Attachment (Rule 57): You may apply for a writ at any stage to secure assets equivalent to the defrauded amount.
8. Special Situations
Scenario | Key notes |
---|---|
B.P. 22 (Bouncing Checks) | You may file either B.P. 22 or estafa based on deceit; filing one does not bar the other (separate elements). |
Cyber Estafa | Information must allege use of computer device/online platform; venue may be the complainant’s residence (Sec. 21, RA 10175 IRR). |
Corporate Respondent | Only corporate officers/agents personally liable if deceit is attributable to them (People v. Spouses Go, G.R. 168539, 2010). |
Public Officer Involved | May constitute malversation or plunder instead. |
Settlement / Affidavit of Desistance | Does not automatically dismiss a criminal case once Information is filed; court discretion applies (People v. Baccay, G.R. 223575, 2017). |
9. Defenses Commonly Raised
- Lack of Demand (for misappropriation).
- Payment/Novation prior to complaint (extinguishes civil but not criminal liability, though may negate deceit).
- Good faith / No intent to defraud.
- Document forgery / signature denial (requires handwriting exam).
- Prescription (if filed after 15 years).
10. Practical Tips for Complainants
- Chronology matters: Attach a timeline in your CA.
- Authenticate screenshots: Print-out with hash values or use notary public’s e-evidence procedure.
- Serve demand by registered mail with registry receipt and tracking print-out; personal service is even better (get “Received” signature).
- Secure PSA-certified IDs of parties for identity proof.
- Expect delay: Typical PI may take 4–8 months; trial 3–5 years. Consider civil action or compromise for faster recovery.
- Keep receipts for filing fees, bail, and litigation costs—these may be recoverable as actual damages.
11. Frequently Asked Questions
Can I go straight to court without the prosecutor? Only if the accused is already in in flagrante custody; otherwise you must pass the PI stage.
Is estafa a heinous crime? No. Penalties max out at reclusión temporal (≤ 20 yrs).
May I file in the barangay? Estafa exceeds ₱10,000 and is criminal; Katarungang Pambarangay handles small-claims civil disputes only.
Can I sue for emotional distress, too? Yes—file an independent civil action for quasi-delict (Art. 33, Civil Code) or include it in damages claim.
What if the respondent flees abroad? Ask the prosecutor or court to issue an HDO/ILBO; coordinate with BI and DFA. You may also pursue recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments if assets are overseas.
12. Summary Flowchart
- Demand / Evidence Gathering
- Complaint-Affidavit → OCP
- Preliminary Investigation
- Information → Court
- Warrant / Bail → Arraignment
- Pre-Trial → Trial
- Decision → Remedies / Execution
(Keep this one-page flow for quick reference in your litigation folder.)
Key Statutes & Circulars Cited
- Revised Penal Code, Arts. 315–318; Arts. 90–92 (prescription); Art. 17 (principal by inducement).
- RA 10951 (2017) – value adjustment.
- RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act, 2012) & IRR (2015).
- Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended by AM 20-06-14-SC (effective 1 May 2021).
- DOJ Department Circular 70 (2023) – National Prosecution Service manual.
- BIR RR 012-2021 – admissibility of e-invoices.
Final Note
While estafa is a potent remedy against fraudsters, its criminal nature means proof beyond reasonable doubt is required. Meticulous documentation and timely action are therefore indispensable. For tailored advice or representation, consult a bar-licensed Philippine lawyer specializing in criminal litigation or financial fraud.