Procedure for Filing an Estafa Case in the Philippines
(Comprehensive legal guide for complainants, lawyers, and researchers)
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and jurisprudence are cited as of 18 June 2025. Consult a Philippine lawyer for advice on a specific situation.
1. What Is Estafa?
| Legal basis | Core idea | Typical examples | 
|---|---|---|
| Article 315, Revised Penal Code (RPC) | Fraud or abuse of confidence causing damage or prejudice | Issuing bouncing checks, double-selling property, misappropriating entrusted money | 
| Article 316 | Other frauds (e.g., selling encumbered property) | Mortgage one car to several creditors | 
| Article 317 | Swindling a minor | Inducing minors to bet or sign documents | 
| Article 318 | Other deceits (catch-all) | “Budol-budol,” fake raffles | 
| Special Laws | E-commerce or securities fraud may be charged as cyber estafa under RA 10175 or as investment fraud under RA 11765 (Financial Products and Services Consumer Protection Act) | 
Key element—deceit or abuse of confidence. Damage may be patrimonial (money/property) or non-patrimonial (prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation).
2. Elements by Mode (Art. 315)
| Mode | Essential elements (must ALL be proved) | 
|---|---|
| a. Abuse of confidence | (1) Money/property received in trust, on commission, or for administration; (2) Misappropriation or conversion; (3) Prejudice to owner; (4) Demand by owner (jurisprudentially persuasive but not indispensable). | 
| b. False pretenses/deceit (sub-modes) | i. Using fictitious name/pretending to possess power/credit; ii. Altering quality or quantity of goods; iii. Bouncing checks (B.P. 22 may be filed alternatively); iv. Other fraudulent means. Common elements: (1) False representation prior to or simultaneous with fraud; (2) Reliance thereon; (3) Damage. | 
| c. Fraudulent means without abuse of confidence | “Swindles” not falling under (a) or (b). | 
3. Jurisdiction, Venue, and Penalty
| Amount defrauded* | Court with jurisdiction | Maximum penalty (post-RA 10951 revaluation)** | 
|---|---|---|
| ≤ ₱2,000,000 | First-level court (MTCC/MTC/MCTC) | Prisión correccional (≤ 6 yrs) | 
| > ₱2,000,000 | Regional Trial Court (RTC) | Prisión mayor to reclusión temporal (6 yrs 1 day–20 yrs) | 
| Any amount via cyber means | RTC – Cybercrime Court | Penalty 1 degree higher (Art. 315 + Sec. 6, RA 10175) | 
* Single act or totality rule applies (sum all amounts in a continuing crime). ** Penalties scale with amount; refer to Art. 315 as amended by RA 10951.
Venue: The crime may be filed where (a) the deceit was committed, (b) any element occurred, or (c) the demand was made/received (particularly for check estafa).
Prescription:
- Ordinary estafa: 15 years (Art. 90, RPC).
 - With public funds/public officer: 20 years.
 - Running is interrupted by filing of complaint-affidavit with the prosecutor.
 
4. Who May File & Standing
- Offended party/owner (natural or juridical).
 - Duly authorized representative (board resolution, SPA).
 - Law enforcement (PNP, NBI) can initiate in flagrante cases, but the prosecutor still determines probable cause.
 
5. Evidence Checklist
Sworn Statement / Complaint-Affidavit (narrative + elements).
Documentary proof
- Receipts, contracts, checks (front & back), demand letters, proofs of delivery
 - Bank records (via subpoena duces tecum or AMLC)
 - SEC/DTI documents (to show fictitious business)
 
Secondary evidence (texts, emails, call recordings; print with authentication).
Witnesses: executing officers, notaries, handwriting experts.
Demand letter & proof of receipt (registered mail registry or courier tracking) – persuasive for misappropriation modes.
6. Step-by-Step Procedure
A. Pre-Complaint Stage
- Gather evidence; have originals photocopied and marked.
 - Draft Complaint-Affidavit (CA) and Joint-Sinumpaang-Salaysay of witnesses.
 - Notarize/subscribe CA before Assistant City/Provincial Prosecutor or Admin Officer-designated.
 
B. Filing with the Office of the City/Provincial Prosecutor (OCP/OPP)
- File & docket: Secure reference number; pay minimal filing fee (varies by LGU; usually ₱50–₱200).
 - Raffle to handling prosecutor.
 
C. Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112, Rules of Criminal Procedure)
Subpoena issued to respondent → 10 days to file Counter-Affidavit (CAFF).
Complainant’s Reply (optional) → 5–10 days.
Clarificatory hearing (discretionary).
Resolution: Probable cause found → Information drafted; otherwise, dismissal.
Remedies against dismissal
- Motion for Reconsideration (MR) within 15 days.
 - Petition for Review to DOJ (Sec. 12, Rule 112) within remaining period or 5 days from notice of denial of MR.
 
D. Court Proceedings
Filing of Information: Prosecutor files with RTC or MTC, attaching supporting resolution.
Issuance of Warrant or Summons (Sec. 6, Rule 112).
Bail: Estafa is generally bailable; amount per DOJ-Bail Guide (e.g., ₱40,000–₱120,000 in lower courts; adjusted upward for large amounts or cyber aggravation).
Arraignment within 10 days of court’s acquisition of jurisdiction; plea entered.
Pre-Trial (Rule 118) – stipulations, marking of exhibits, possible plea-bargain.
Trial Proper
- Prosecution evidence → cross-examination.
 - Demurrer to Evidence (Sec. 23, Rule 119) optional.
 - Defense evidence.
 - Formal offer of evidence; Memoranda if required.
 
Decision: Acquittal or conviction; civil liability adjudged.
Post-Judgment Remedies
- MR or Motion for New Trial within 15 days (Rule 121).
 - Appeal: RTC decisions → CA; CA decisions → SC.
 
7. Civil Aspect & Restitution
- Civil action impliedly instituted unless the offended party waives, reserves, or files separately (Sec. 1(b), Rule 111).
 - Restitution or Reparation may be ordered even on acquittal if the act or omission is proven.
 - Attachment (Rule 57): You may apply for a writ at any stage to secure assets equivalent to the defrauded amount.
 
8. Special Situations
| Scenario | Key notes | 
|---|---|
| B.P. 22 (Bouncing Checks) | You may file either B.P. 22 or estafa based on deceit; filing one does not bar the other (separate elements). | 
| Cyber Estafa | Information must allege use of computer device/online platform; venue may be the complainant’s residence (Sec. 21, RA 10175 IRR). | 
| Corporate Respondent | Only corporate officers/agents personally liable if deceit is attributable to them (People v. Spouses Go, G.R. 168539, 2010). | 
| Public Officer Involved | May constitute malversation or plunder instead. | 
| Settlement / Affidavit of Desistance | Does not automatically dismiss a criminal case once Information is filed; court discretion applies (People v. Baccay, G.R. 223575, 2017). | 
9. Defenses Commonly Raised
- Lack of Demand (for misappropriation).
 - Payment/Novation prior to complaint (extinguishes civil but not criminal liability, though may negate deceit).
 - Good faith / No intent to defraud.
 - Document forgery / signature denial (requires handwriting exam).
 - Prescription (if filed after 15 years).
 
10. Practical Tips for Complainants
- Chronology matters: Attach a timeline in your CA.
 - Authenticate screenshots: Print-out with hash values or use notary public’s e-evidence procedure.
 - Serve demand by registered mail with registry receipt and tracking print-out; personal service is even better (get “Received” signature).
 - Secure PSA-certified IDs of parties for identity proof.
 - Expect delay: Typical PI may take 4–8 months; trial 3–5 years. Consider civil action or compromise for faster recovery.
 - Keep receipts for filing fees, bail, and litigation costs—these may be recoverable as actual damages.
 
11. Frequently Asked Questions
Can I go straight to court without the prosecutor? Only if the accused is already in in flagrante custody; otherwise you must pass the PI stage.
Is estafa a heinous crime? No. Penalties max out at reclusión temporal (≤ 20 yrs).
May I file in the barangay? Estafa exceeds ₱10,000 and is criminal; Katarungang Pambarangay handles small-claims civil disputes only.
Can I sue for emotional distress, too? Yes—file an independent civil action for quasi-delict (Art. 33, Civil Code) or include it in damages claim.
What if the respondent flees abroad? Ask the prosecutor or court to issue an HDO/ILBO; coordinate with BI and DFA. You may also pursue recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments if assets are overseas.
12. Summary Flowchart
- Demand / Evidence Gathering
 - Complaint-Affidavit → OCP
 - Preliminary Investigation
 - Information → Court
 - Warrant / Bail → Arraignment
 - Pre-Trial → Trial
 - Decision → Remedies / Execution
 
(Keep this one-page flow for quick reference in your litigation folder.)
Key Statutes & Circulars Cited
- Revised Penal Code, Arts. 315–318; Arts. 90–92 (prescription); Art. 17 (principal by inducement).
 - RA 10951 (2017) – value adjustment.
 - RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act, 2012) & IRR (2015).
 - Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended by AM 20-06-14-SC (effective 1 May 2021).
 - DOJ Department Circular 70 (2023) – National Prosecution Service manual.
 - BIR RR 012-2021 – admissibility of e-invoices.
 
Final Note
While estafa is a potent remedy against fraudsters, its criminal nature means proof beyond reasonable doubt is required. Meticulous documentation and timely action are therefore indispensable. For tailored advice or representation, consult a bar-licensed Philippine lawyer specializing in criminal litigation or financial fraud.