Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (BP 22), popularly known as the Bouncing Checks Law, was enacted to maintain the stability of the Philippine financial system. It penalizes the act of making or drawing and issuing a check without sufficient funds or credit. Because the law protects the "public order" and the "integrity of the banking system," it is classified as malum prohibitum—meaning the act itself is a crime regardless of the intent of the issuer.
The Two Distinct Punishable Acts
Under Section 1 of BP 22, there are two specific ways a person can violate the law:
1. Issuance with Knowledge of Insufficient Funds
This occurs when a person makes, draws, and issues a check to apply on account or for value, knowing at the time of issue that they do not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank for the payment of such check in full upon its presentment.
2. Failure to Keep Sufficient Funds
This occurs when a person has sufficient funds in the bank at the time of issuance but fails to keep enough money to cover the check if presented within ninety (90) days from the date on the check. In this scenario, the check is dishonored upon presentment for a reason other than "Account Closed" or "Insufficient Funds" (e.g., "Payment Stopped"), but it is later discovered that the funds were actually insufficient at the time of presentment.
Elements of the Offense
To secure a conviction under BP 22, the prosecution must prove the following three elements beyond reasonable doubt:
I. The Making, Drawing, and Issuance of any Check
The check must be issued to apply on account or for value. It does not matter if the check was issued as a guarantee or for a pre-existing obligation. The law applies even if the check is postdated.
II. Dishonor of the Check
The check must be presented to the drawee bank within ninety (90) days from its date and subsequently dishonored. The reason for dishonor is usually:
- DAIF (Drawn Against Insufficient Funds)
- DAUD (Drawn Against Uncleared Deposits)
- Account Closed
III. Knowledge of Insufficiency of Funds
The issuer must have known at the time of issuance that there were no sufficient funds to cover the check. Since "knowledge" is a state of mind, the law provides a Prima Facie Presumption of Knowledge under Section 2.
The Importance of the Notice of Dishonor
The "knowledge" element is the most litigated part of BP 22. The law presumes the issuer knew of the insufficiency if they are notified of the dishonor and fail to pay the amount or make arrangements for payment within five (5) banking days after receiving notice.
Requirements for a Valid Notice:
- In Writing: Verbal notice is legally insufficient.
- Actual Receipt: The prosecution must prove the issuer actually received the letter. A registry return receipt is often used, but it must be authenticated by the person who signed it or the mail carrier.
- Opportunity to Pay: The issuer must be given exactly five banking days from the date of receipt to settle the obligation.
If the prosecution fails to prove that a written notice of dishonor was received by the accused, the presumption of knowledge does not arise, and the accused must be acquitted.
Penalties and Jurisprudence
A person found guilty of violating BP 22 may face:
- Imprisonment: Not less than thirty (30) days but not more than one (1) year; or
- Fine: Double the amount of the check (but not to exceed ₱200,000); or
- Both: In some cases, the court may impose both.
Administrative Circular No. 12-2000
The Supreme Court, through this circular, clarified that while BP 22 carries a penalty of imprisonment, judges have the discretion to impose only a fine if the circumstances suggest the issuer did not act in bad faith or as a professional "scammer." This does not decriminalize bouncing checks; it simply provides a policy of preference for fines over jail time in certain instances.
Common Defenses
- Prescription: The action must be filed within four (4) years from the date the cause of action accrued (the lapse of the 5-day grace period).
- Lack of Written Notice: As discussed, failure to prove receipt of a written notice of dishonor is fatal to the prosecution's case.
- Payment: If the check is paid within the five-day grace period, no crime is committed.
- Forgery: If the signature on the check is not that of the accused.
Summary Table
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Issuance | Check must be for value or on account. |
| Presentment | Must be within 90 days of the check's date. |
| Dishonor | Bank must reject the check for insufficiency/closed account. |
| Notice | Issuer must receive written notice and fail to pay within 5 banking days. |